User talk:Usmaaaangul

January 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Behram Khan Kilay has been reverted. Your edit here to Behram Khan Kilay was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/behramkhan.kilay/photos) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:26, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm TerryAlex. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Behram Khan Kilay because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. TerryAlex (talk) 06:37, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Behram Khan Kilay


The article Behram Khan Kilay has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * subject is non notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Meatsgains (talk) 05:14, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Behram Khan Kilay (February 2)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamietw was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Behram Khan Kilay and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Usmaaaangul Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jamietw&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Usmaaaangul reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamietw (talk) 21:15, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Six months
Hello, it's been over six months since you last worked on it. While the article is not acceptable in its current state, all villages are suitable topics, providing the articles have reliable sources.

You can take as long as you like to work on this, or indeed any other draft, but there progress should be visible to other users even if it is slow. If a draft is unededited for more than six months it could be concluded that the editor(s) involved have given up or forgotten about it, and the work could get deleted. Rankersbo (talk) 09:07, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Behram Khan Kilay concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Behram Khan Kilay, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Behram Khan Kilay


Hello, Usmaaaangul. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Behram Khan Kilay".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:33, 6 March 2016 (UTC)