User talk:Usmankhokhar1986

Speedy deletion nomination of Usman khokhar


A tag has been placed on Usman khokhar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Jussychoulex (talk) 09:03, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Muhammad Usman Damani has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Muhammad Usman Damani was changed by Usmankhokhar1986 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959108 on 2013-06-12T06:04:21+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:04, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Usman khokhar


The article Usman khokhar has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Is not a notable person.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Adamdaley (talk) 08:13, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Usman khokhar for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Usman khokhar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Usman khokhar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tyros1972 Talk 08:21, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. You were told on the talk page of an earlier account that continually creating unsuitable articles would be likely to lead to a block, and creating a new account to do so makes no difference. Wikipedia is not a social network site, and does not exist for people to post self-promotional pages. Your other account has been blocked for three days, after which time you are welcome to make constructive contributions to the encyclopaedia. If you believe there are good reasons why this account should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:36, 13 June 2013 (UTC)