User talk:Ustaudinger

Spamming of activequant

 * Articles

ActiveQuant Activequant
 * Accounts

Ustaudinger (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · [ logs] · block user · [ block log]) Klaqopen (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · [ logs] · block user · [ block log])  81.221.125.7 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • trace •  RBLs • block user • [ block log])  87.176.221.72 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · [ logs] · block user · [ block log])  84.134.143.29 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · [ logs] · block user · [ block log])  85.177.178.113 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · [ logs] · block user · [ block log])  84.72.98.196 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • trace •  RBLs • block user • [ block log])  84.253.34.239 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • trace •  RBLs • block user • [ block log])  83.217.111.202 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • trace •  RBLs • block user • [ block log])   This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent insertion of spam, commercial content, and/or links is prohibited under policy. Any further spamming may result in your account and/or your IP address being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" is strongly discouraged. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam);
 * and you must always:
 * 1) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Conflict of Interest. --Hu12 (talk) 15:04, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

You have been Blocked for Disruptive editing and abuse of process by making bad faith nominations of articles.

→Articles for deletion/TA-Lib →Articles for deletion/Qtstalker →Articles for deletion/Technical analysis software --Hu12 (talk) 15:08, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Adding standard user warning template
in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. Ronnotel (talk) 18:38, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

UStaudinger, in concurrence with User:Hu12, I have reduced your original indefinite block to a duration of one week. Please be careful in the future to observe WP policy regarding adding spam content, editing pages where you may have a conflict of interest and submitting bad-faith nominations for article deletion. Ronnotel (talk) 18:38, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Ronnotel, I just do the same as you did with activequant and quantlib, i clean up in wikipedia and i see no conflict of interest as i can distinguish pretty well! QTStalker and TA-Lib are not notable. I pointed out several times that there are dozens of software projects exactly like activequant and quantlib listed in wikipedia, all i do is roll out the procedure, rule and opinion YOU started with activequant and quantlib. Could you please point out the difference between TA-Lib, QTStalker, ActiveQuant and Quantlib in relation to notability? Is QTStalker or TA-Lib more relevant or notable than QuantLib or ActiveQuant?

Continued disruption using anon IP
Block extended--Hu12 (talk) 20:54, 9 January 2008 (UTC)