User talk:Usvi Kasine

Question
why did you say my edit to Richard Moll was "Non-constructive" all i did was list his height, several actor pages have their heights on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.96.140.200 (talk) 00:36, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

You are right in this regard that several actors have notifications of their heights. I corrected the name of his spouse Susan Brown.Usvi Kasine (talk) 11:19, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Note
I see most of your edits are just adding tags to articles. I personally see nothing constructive in it, but I highly recommend you to see WP:BOLD. This will help you understand the spirit of Wikipedia and be a good editor. Spamming articles with tags is never appreciated. Shahid •  Talk 2 me  09:41, 9 October 2011 (UTC)


 * PS: please also read carefully WP:LEAD. The lead does not essentially need to be sourced - it summarises the article and its whole content. Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  09:48, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Adding tags to the articles is the right thing to do. Please read Citing sources. You are right about the lead article but then it has to be supported by the body. Read WP:V. You have to maintain neutral point of view. Usvi Kasine (talk) 10:03, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Excuse me, are you really referring me to these policies? I've been here enough time to know what each and every one of them means. But if I see someone dedicating their time to just adding tags to articles, I can't see the point of editing Wikipedia. And yes, read again WP:BOLD. It's better to be contructive than adding tags just for fun. Enough said. Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  10:10, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, you are right I am referring you to the policies. I would not do it with someone who is maintaining neutral point of view. If some editor is a fan of someone, I do not mind till the time its not the violation of Citing sources. You better uprise yourself again on tagging the articles. Its all from my side. Usvi Kasine (talk) 10:16, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * That put a smile on my face. You are accusing me of not being neutral and telling me to uprise myself when all you're doing is spamming articles with tags. And you also call me a fan because I do not agree with your edits? Huh! Sorry dear, you've got a long way to go until you contribute even tenth of what I've contributed to Wikipedia. Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  10:26, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Glad I have amused you. You are again right in a way of your contributions. But it does not give you any right to violate the policy on neutral point of view. This what happens when you start taking things for granted. Someone has to put you wise. Anyways, I am just going according to the policy and tagging an article is a right thing to do. Usvi Kasine (talk) 10:34, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * If you are accusing me of violating WP:NPOV, then cite diffs to prove it. If tagging articles is what Wikipedia is all about to you (and it is definitely not constructive editing), then be my guest, but mind you, Wikipedia spreads goodwill. Why wouldn't you try to work a bit harder a cite sources yourself? Well, I'm sure you would not spend your time on something as substantial as that. Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  11:20, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

What about assuming good faith? If you stop supporting your favorate personalities and maintain a neutral point of view, it will be better. Please feel free to create a fan cite. I am not just tagging the articles but also fighting vandalism. Usvi Kasine (talk) 18:36, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * How do you know the people whose articles you've tagged are my favourites? Why do you think I oppose to the tags because I like them? Huh! And you are telling me to assume good faith when you're doing the exact opposite? You, who seems to know nothing about what editing Wikipedia means, are telling me to create a fansite? And how come opposing to tags is an act of POV? You clearly have no valid arguments. If you knew my history of contributions you would see who really is fighting against POV and vandalism. Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  20:30, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * It is very irritating when people place tags all over articles. Please add sources yourself if you think they need it.♦ Dr. Blofeld  11:51, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Please do not get irritated and feel free to add sources yourself. Make it your call rather than acting on other's advice/consent. I am identifying fan cites and also fighting against vandals. Usvi Kasine (talk) 18:40, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * It is irritating when someone is being unconstructive - you are doing nothing other than tagging articles. It's easy to tag articles, the true acts of goodwill lie in making this encyclopedia better, by citing sources and expanding articles. I wouldn't want to cite myself as an example, but Dr. Blofeld is one of the most prolific editors on Wikipedia, so take him as an example instead of Wikilawyering. Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  20:30, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I have noticed that you spend more time in accusing others rather than doing something constructive on Wikipedia. I admit that you have a lot of experience regarding your contributions but this does not give you the ownership of Wikipedia. So please assume good faith and try to abide by Civility. I have no problem with Dr. Blofeld's opinion but again I would like to say that I am going according to the policy. Usvi Kasine (talk) 20:41, 9 October 2011 (UTC)