User talk:Utad3~enwiki

Harold Aspden
Hi, I noticed your link to Harold_Aspden on the vote for deletion page. I had not heard of him amazingly, what an interesting article. Unfortunately, you may have opened a 'can of worms' on that article by linking to it on the deletion page. So lets keep an eye on this article as it might soon be under scrutiny by people intent on discrediting it. Otherwise, thanks for your vote of support! -Ionized 23:51, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
 * "The result was delete" per Articles for deletion/Harold Aspden. -- Jeff G. 19:23, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Creation: The Physical Truth (talk)
I have added a "" template to the article Creation: The Physical Truth, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Creation: The Physical Truth. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. ScienceApologist 23:57, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Your contributions history shows that you have been aggressively cross-posting in order to influence Creation: The Physical Truth. Although the Arbitration Committee has ruled that "[t]he occasional light use of cross-posting to talk pages is part of Wikipedia's common practice"1, such cross-posting should adhere to specific guidelines found in Spam. In the past, aggressively worded cross-posting has contributed towards an Arbitration Committee ruling of disruptive behavior that resulted in blocking2. It is best not to game the system, and instead respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building, by ceasing to further crosspost, and instead allowing the process to reflect the opinions of editors that were already actively involved in the matter at hand. Thank you.. Asterion talk 02:46, 2 January 2007 (UTC)


 * I have seen now your message, I was not aware that it was not allowed; I apologize and thank you for you warning. I was trying to alert Administrators to abusive tagging by Wikipedia editors, who joined like a gang, which have been deleting for a long time good science articles at Wikipedia, and no one seems to care to stop them. Thanks --Utad3 02:52, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem. Everybody make mistakes. Regards, Asterion talk 02:53, 2 January 2007 (UTC)


 * I see that you have been warned about this massive post, so I won't add any further information than is already above. (aeropagitica) 03:38, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks --Utad3 03:42, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I missed your note last night. Asterion talk 10:20, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem :) tx! --Utad3 17:26, 7 January 2007 (UTC)


 * This same user has spammed Wikipedia twice anonymously as 213.58.99.22 with links to copies of its articles on Creation: The Physical Truth and Harold Aspden at PowerPedia - please see User talk:213.58.99.22 and Special:Contributions/213.58.99.22 for details. -- Jeff G. 17:38, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * It was a token of my appreciation to the editors who supported my position. Now, for sure I will have to take long compulsive Wiki vacations :) Goodbye. --Utad3 17:45, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * This same user Utad3 has also spammed Wikipedia many times in its own right - please see all of the "Asking for your aid" Contributions dated 1 January 2007 on Special:Contributions/Utad3 for details. -- Jeff G. 18:13, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * This issue - derived from the abusive deletion nomination of the two articles mentioned in Articles for deletion/Harold Aspden and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creation: The Physical Truth - was already discussed above with the Wiki administrators Asterion and (aeropagitica) : as I told before, I was not aware at the time. Curiously, you don't even mention the long hours of contributions that I had to spend in the edition of those two articles in order to provide the most accurate and sourced data. What more can you possibly want from me now? --Utad3 20:24, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * "The result was delete. Proto ::  ►  11:46, 8 January 2007 (UTC)" per Articles for deletion/Log/2007 January 2.  Please note that the link will get you close, but the quote is one line above the link, so you may have to scroll up.  This situation is an artifact of the Articles for deletion logging process. -- Jeff G. 14:03, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Utad3. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Utad3~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 03:16, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 20:08, 22 April 2015 (UTC)