User talk:Uttam Roy28

April 2019
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Vinita Chatterjee. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. ''Diffs: Do not add content that attempts to present opinions, especially your own opinions, as fact. It is not an encyclopedia's business to describe someone as "patriotic" or "spiritual". That is totally inappropriate for inclusion.'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:26, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

How do we or u remove the templates?
Sir please read newspaper reports there are articlee that support what I wrote. N with great concern I m asking how do u make her page formal n factual without deleting information? I was also concerned about the templates. It looks odd to have our celebrity's wiki page marked ? How can u or we remove it. Pls share Uttam Roy28 (talk) 04:41, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The templates will be removed when the issues they describe have been resolved.  General Ization Talk  04:52, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
Your recent editing history at Vinita Chatterjee shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  General Ization Talk  05:14, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

U are Deleting Facts and Links.
Why are u creating a personal war for no reason. like many others we have read about her achievements. It's becoming a personal war for no reason.. when I wanted to solve the matter peacefully Uttam Roy28 (talk) 05:19, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Who are you talking to? You created a new discussion rather than responding to an existing discussion. Note the difference between how I responded to you and how you are responding to others. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:23, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Good advice
We have had problematic edits at Vinita Chatterjee, beginning with the article being written like a puff piece. Any content you add must be attributed to a reliable source, and I would very strongly recommend that you heed the advice of editors that are far more experienced than you are, rather than blindly reverting them. Experienced editors are typically familiar with the basic requirements for article style and are also typically familiar with the expectations the community has for content and tone. For example if Chatterjee is not chiefly known as a journalist or a rapper or whatever, that content probably doesn't belong in the lead. Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:22, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Great : why don't you solve the problems.
All I am concerned is if Vinita mam sees all these being done by her fans in the name of respect she will be really disappointed seeing templates n wrong notices. She may not know us but we all admire her. Regards. It's my humble request to delete those templates as it's a matter of her respect. FYI. I don't know what happened to Veronica or why... I am not concerned about her other fans. It's a mark of disrespect for entire Bengali community to red mark it's favourite artists. Uttam Roy28 (talk) 05:29, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Sorry but Wikipedia articles aren't created to benefit the person. This is an encyclopedia. We aren't going to remove tags because it will upset her mother or fans. That benefits no one. To be blunt, us volunteer editors just want to improve the encyclopedia. Removing these tags would be doing a disservice to the encyclopedia and its readers. Us editors needs to these tags to know where the problems are and readers are expecting all information on this Wikipedia to be neutral/factual. When editors with a conflict of interest get involved, or edits are unsourced, it undermines the publics faith in Wikipedia. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 05:34, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Uttam, notice #2: stop creating new discussions. If you want to reply, reply below without creating a new section. Don't click on "new section", click "edit". The content at Vinita Chatterjee is not Chatterjee's article, it is not your article, and it is not the Bengali people's article. This is Wikipedia's article. The templates will go away when the problems disappear. More problems = more templates. As for the snotty section header "Great : why don't you solve the problems", I have tried, as have others, including HickoryOughtShirt?4, but editors like you, who are ignorant of Wikipedia content and style guidelines keep reverting us. The more time that is wasted, the longer it will take to get the article into proper shape. Your decision. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:41, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for Finding a solution
I was only seeking a solution from my first post till now. I was only polite. I guess u guys took out someone else anger on me. When I said I'm a lawyer that was just an introduction... Not to give any legal threat... This is the hat happens to celebrities we fans fight over her and she is totally unaware. I still insist on a good will Make her wiki page standard as she is the pride of our nation. God bless Uttam Roy28 (talk) 05:45, 14 April 2019 (UTC)