User talk:UuuuuuUV

Along with the help and support of the community, I created and am actively helping to build and maintain the optimal Vaporwave Wikipedia entry.

"Users are expected to collaborate" Do not delete constructive edits. Help identify the proper sources and help the public's knowledge on the topic grow. Constantly deleting edits without attempting to improve the quality of the page seems very self serving and bizarre.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Semitransgenic talk. 19:55, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Blocked again
I've reblocked your account for your conduct on vaporwave. Your edits are in dispute yet you're continuing to edit war over them, and you're refusing to discuss the issue with anyone. This is disruptive. S warm  ♠  22:19, 18 January 2016 (UTC) How do I discuss the issues? All my edits are indisputably constructive, relevant and correct. I have cited my edits with numerous sources in the past that have all been inexplicably deleted, it would seem someone targets my edits directly.
 * present clear WP:RS material that connects the artist Blank Banshee with the subject of the article, it's very simple, don't push your own WP:OR. It's better to discuss what you want to say, and the sources you want to use to support it, on the talk page of the article. Semitransgenic  talk. 09:18, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Semitransgenic, you ARE the only one who cares. The specific line which you've removed several times concerning Skylar Spence and Blank Banshee refers to two well known artists within the Vaporwave community. It is entirely constructive and refers to the continuing evolution of the genre. I have included source material in the past, which you removed. I am clearly not here to vandalize Wikipedia or spread misinformation. I'm somewhat confused as to why you target this specific line. I am an avid fan of this genre and have followed it since it's inception. The Wikipedia page must reflect the general consensus of the community. I realize you're quite adamant about this but you clearly are not familiar with this genre.
 * yeah, I care about reliable sourcing, that's all you need to address, take a look at WP:IKNOW while you are at it. Semitransgenic  talk. 13:14, 19 January 2016 (UTC)