User talk:UvaSEP

Welcome!
Hello, UvaSEP, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Jennifer Grigsby, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 02:52, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Jennifer Grigsby


A tag has been placed on Jennifer Grigsby requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —C.Fred (talk) 02:52, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

William M. Anderson, Jr. article
Hello, thanks for writing this! I've just seen an article on the same topic, I suppose written by one of your colleagues. This article is better. However, I’m still a bit concerned that it has only one non-UWM source citations. That worries me since for the guidelines on someone being notable, meaning covered enough in media to get a Wikipedia article on them, citations not connected with the person's employer are desirable.

Are there any reliable sources (ones not written by or for this person) you can add, perhaps from your student newspaper's archive? If so just edit the article and add citations using the cite tool, or if you have any thoughts or questions just let me know. (As a suggestion - your student newspaper archive might be a good source since they would surely have done an interview or an article you could cite? I've never known a student newspaper that didn't find something about the head of admin's management they didn't have some objection to or something...!)Blythwood (talk) 21:17, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Katherine Barrell
Hello, UvaSEP,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Katherine Barrell should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Katherine Barrell.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 07:48, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Katherine Barrell for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Katherine Barrell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Katherine Barrell& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 19:39, 1 September 2016 (UTC)