User talk:Uyarafath

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Uyarafath. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. James (talk/contribs) 15:27, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Limnesh Augustine


A tag has been placed on Limnesh Augustine, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://www.coxandkings.com/promotion/3d-painting-tours/limnesh-augustine-profile-details.shtml. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. red dogsix (talk) 15:44, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Limnesh Augustine


A tag has been placed on Limnesh Augustine, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. red dogsix (talk) 14:44, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Limnesh Augustine. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. red dogsix (talk) 14:50, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Limnesh Augustine, you may be blocked from editing. red dogsix (talk) 14:53, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Limnesh Augustine


A tag has been placed on Limnesh Augustine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. red <b style="color:#000;">dog</b><i style="color:#000;">six</i> (talk) 14:58, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I read the talk page. I also read the content that speaks so glowingly of its subject: just like the message at the talk page, the article praises him with "renowned" and talk of his technical expertise.  Please consider if you'd used such language in your dissertation and imagine what your committee's reaction would have been.  Minus that content, nothing particularly significant about him appears; it's a matter of "no indication of significance", as plenty of people get in Guinness.  Nyttend (talk) 16:56, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Limnesh Augustine. red <b style="color:#000;">dog</b><i style="color:#000;">six</i> (talk) 14:58, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Indian painters


A tag has been placed on List of Indian painters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. red <b style="color:#000;">dog</b><i style="color:#000;">six</i> (talk) 17:14, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of National Wind Tunnel facility IIT Kanpur


A tag has been placed on National Wind Tunnel facility IIT Kanpur requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Muhandes (talk) 09:14, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

To Muhandes
Hi, Hope you are not knowing what is difference between company and national facility. If you are not sure, please don't tag for 'speedy deletion'. Thank you.

Speedy deletion nomination of Anuj Gupta


A tag has been placed on Anuj Gupta, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  FITINDIA  09:30, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Indian Association of Clinical Cardiologists


The article Indian Association of Clinical Cardiologists has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "References used only mention this organization. I cannot find anything better in my search for references. Holding off on AfD in hopes that someone can add more sources to demonstrate WP:CORPDEPTH."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CNMall41 (talk) 22:11, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Jade Mya
Please refer to WP:PAID and make the required disclosure if appropriate. Thanks. --CNMall41 (talk) 22:33, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi, -Sure. If I get paid I must disclose it. That is my responsibility. Thank you.Uyarafath (talk) 03:43, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Based on what I found, I believe disclosure would be necessary. If I am wrong, please let me know. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:25, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi, . Whenever I get paid for contributing to Wikipedia, I disclose the details in the respective talk page. As of now, I am not paid anything to this particular article. If I get paid I will sure disclose it in the article talk page. I respect always Wikipedia guidelines. Thank you for your valuable replies. Looking forward to get more input from such experienced person to improve myself.Uyarafath (talk) 04:53, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Just seems strange that you uploaded a commercial image to a Wikipedia page and were not paid to do so. Especially since the original image appears to have been uploaded on Flickr only one day prior, by a person who is the founder of a marketing company that advertises Wikipedia editing as a service. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:15, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi, - You are 100% correct. I was asked from a person to create an encyclopedic content with neutral view about Jade Mya. But, I haven't been paid by anyone and even from the person who requested me. So if I get paid, immediately I will disclose it.  Whenever I am requested to make encyclopedic content on any subject and if I get paid I disclose it. You may visit these talk page Talk:Comparison of authentication solutions Talk:Elliott Michael Smith where I disclosed. I am always ensuring neutrality and notability and I never make any content for promotional for anyone. If any such, people like you always help me to correct. Thank youUyarafath (talk) 06:51, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Okay. Sorry to sound accusatory. It just seems strange that "a person" asked you to create an article and you are not being paid, despite the fact that the image uploader is the founder of a marketing firm that sells Wikipedia editing services - not to mention you have disclosed being a paid editor for a few other pages. There is nothing wrong with having a COI as long as you edit from a neutral point of view; however, having a financial interest that you do NOT disclose is against Wikimedia's TOU. My main concern is the possibility of paid edits that have not been disclosed. Also, I am not sure if what you said about being asked to create a page still constitutes a conflict of interest or not. I will likely just bring it up at WP:COIN to get an opinion as I don't know for sure. Thanks for the clarification. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:23, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi, - Okay. Got it. The person who asked me to create this article is running a marketing company. I clarify, I am an individual, not employed in any such marketing company. I am informed I will get paid if page sustains from the person. Thank you so much for all your information  and guidance my dear friend. Also please visit to my user page where I declared COI. Is it fine? please correct if anything.Uyarafath (talk) 05:37, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Indian Association of Clinical Cardiologists for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Indian Association of Clinical Cardiologists is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Indian Association of Clinical Cardiologists until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CNMall41 (talk) 18:37, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Anuj Gupta for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anuj Gupta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Anuj Gupta until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Jupitus Smart  09:44, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Adda52rummy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adda52rummy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Adda52rummy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Jupitus Smart  09:54, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of D.S. Kothari Fellowship


A tag has been placed on D.S. Kothari Fellowship, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Edwardx (talk) 14:59, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Adda52 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adda52 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Adda52 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CNMall41 (talk) 17:51, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Final warning
Although you have disclosed your paid editing for some articles, your editing here is very very problematic as you've been adding false tags and have even removed speedy deletion nominations on articles you've created. In addition, the poor quality paid articles are creating unnecessary work for other editors. Any further disruptive behavior in any form will result in your editing privileges being completely withdrawn. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  12:58, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Also, do you have any alternate accounts like ?&mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  13:01, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi User:SpacemanSpiff, What happened? What is wrong with me? I have stopped my paid service after the COIN discussions. Suddenly why are you giving warning? Did I edit anything after COIN discussion?. I deleted 'speedy deletion nomination' but that was sometime back not now. After understanding the guidelines I haven't deleted anything.I do follow Wikipedia guidelines only. Please correct me if anything wrong. I again inform you guys that I am not doing any paid editing currently, voluntarily I contribute proper encyclopedic articles only after COIN discussions. Please go through my recent logs, if anything wrong kindly mention it. Thank you.Uyarafath (talk) 16:29, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * And I didn't have any alternate accounts. It is the only one account I am using. I never hide my face and identity for anything. Thank you.Uyarafath (talk) 16:33, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I did not see the COIN discussion prior to my note here, but your disruption on here has been very very problematic and is a time sink for volunteer editors. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  02:57, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: UrbanClap (August 31)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jcc was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:UrbanClap and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:UrbanClap Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jcc&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:UrbanClap reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

jcc (tea and biscuits) 14:15, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Jade Mya for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jade Mya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jade Mya until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 19:53, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Matthew Edward Zagula


The article Matthew Edward Zagula has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Highly advertorial - I don't see anything to make him notable"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gbawden (talk) 14:15, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Jade Mya
I don't understand this. You were contracted to do it earlier and now you're claiming you aren't, after the afd and now that you're wasting more community time on the draft. THere's something not right about this. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  14:33, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jade Mya (November 12)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jade Mya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Jade_Mya Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bearcat&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Jade_Mya reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bearcat (talk) 20:29, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. ☆ Bri (talk) 23:24, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Elliott Michael Smith for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elliott Michael Smith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Elliott Michael Smith until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 00:04, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:19, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Jade Mya
Draft:Jade Mya, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Jade Mya and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Jade Mya during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:01, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Unblock request (July 2018)

 * As the blocking administrator, I am willing to unblock on the condition that if you create any new articles, they must be through the WP:AFC process. Additionally if any more promotional articles are created by you, your account will be blocked again without warning. If you agree to this, you can reply here. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:12, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi TonyBallioni, I agree completely. It is great to have a positive response from you. Yes. I must go through  the WP:AFC process for my new article. I will never use the WP for advertisement and for earning purpose.  Thank you so muchUyarafath (talk) 14:18, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot TonyBallioni. Uyarafath (talk) 14:26, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Not a problem, and just for the sake of clarity, the requirement to use AFC applies to all articles you want to create going forward. If you have six months without any issues, we can talk then about removing the restrictions. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:28, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Sure.Uyarafath (talk) 14:31, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of John Adrain for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Adrain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/John Adrain until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 16:19, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Comparison of authentication solutions moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Comparison of authentication solutions, is too promotional to remain published. Ideally, the list should only contain notable subjects that already have their own article, or are at least mentioned in another article. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can improve the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article is ready to be reconsidered, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. —  Newslinger  talk   23:09, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Comparison of authentication solutions concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Comparison of authentication solutions, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Anuj Gupta
Hello, Uyarafath. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anuj Gupta, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:02, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Anuj Gupta


Hello, Uyarafath. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anuj Gupta".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 07:22, 30 December 2022 (UTC)