User talk:Uygur Brother

October 2020
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Polygenism, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please also be very careful of using words which are now offensive. Thanks, AussieWikiDan (talk) 18:07, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

I reverted more of your edits due to lack of citation and use of the same dated and offensive word. (whicht offensive)? AussieWikiDan (talk) 18:12, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Out of Asia theory. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions.   ❯❯ 1sub Atomic   (💬Talk)  19:08, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Polygenism, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.   ❯❯ 1sub Atomic   (💬Talk)  19:10, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Wu Xinzhi. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia.   ❯❯ 1sub Atomic   (💬Talk)  19:12, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Hey I'm citizating sources you can check it especially this mythologies sources and I'm not intending to offence anyone if I used a word considered offensive please remind which?

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. AussieWikiDan (talk) 02:38, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Hey I'm citizating sources you can check it especially this mythologies sources and I'm not intending to offence anyone if I used a word considered offensive please remind which? Mongoloid is the scientic word. How else you are suppose to say it? East Asian? But Native Americans are Mongoloid either if You are denying that you are hardcore polygenist yourself. I'm adding reliable sources you can check all that I can provide you. What I believe or don't is not matter of your concern we are supposed to have a freedom of religion and philosophy aren't we? As a matter of fact I strongly believed in evolutionism, but I'm only stating what I know Polygenism states from reliable sources. I also found reliable mythological sources. Please accept that. The fact that you perhaps doesn't like some philosophy dosn't mean you are approved to censor what Polygenism states.

I'm not intending to promote xenophobia or to offend anyone if you thought differently. Stay well and please accept that.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Wu Xinzhi. AussieWikiDan (talk) 10:37, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I am not censoring but removing edits which do not adhere to Wikipedia policy. Information added to articles generally has to be referenced, you did not use citations. The use of that word is deemed dated and offensive, -. You also added unreferenced views which seemed to argue for polygenism, which is now not agreed upon by modern scientists. It actually was and maybe still is used to promote racial inequality. You are welcome to continue debate on the article's talk page.

AussieWikiDan (talk) 13:51, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

You definitely are censoring and I'm against racial discrimination. Listen please what do you think. The fact that most scientists doesn't support any studies that are considered polygenistic doesn't mean we should just ignore them. They are controversial but can be interpretated that way I could provide many other. I strongly oppose purely Creationist view. I just think that scientists are too single minded without looking at other possibilities and it is sad that any potentially polygenetic views are banned on principle just because some polygenists were evil people supporting slavery or enequal treaty more than two houndred years ago. Many monogenists were also racist. My view aren't results of lack of education as claims the common stereotype. I happen to know all really well about supposed "Mithochondrial Eve" (undoubtedly inspired by Christian mythology) and supposed Ychromosomal Adam" and about official genetics. Nevertheless I can't find answers to many questions in the official African hypothesis (which have nothing to do with liking or disliking African people). For example why all people Africans (not only Nilotic but all) like all people other possess small but nevertheless amount of Neanderthal DNA? Supporters of African theory long thought differently. And they still wasn't found super haplogroup common to all people regardless of race or variant and compatible with all phenotipical features . I heard "Eve" theory was also heavily questioned. There still wasn't find one model of supposed origins of Neanderthals and interbreeding with them and no proof that Neanderthals or other hominids really originated in Africa. Like said Voltaire and Paul Broca and many others not racist scientists and philosophers the similarietes in our phenotype can be explained by similiar circumstances in all environments and that Evolusion fovor similiar gens and it doesn't nessecerily prove common ancestry. Recent genetic is advanced but still not all knowing. Not all evolutionary and genetic processes were discovered yet. Perhaps also majority of scientist is too dogmatic. I'm asking again. What offensive words do you mean? Mongoloid or Caucasian are both scientific terms and you just can't name the race of East Asians and Native Americans without using word Mongoloid. As about mythological things I happen to be Taoist myself and I know both that my religion oppose racial inequality and that Chinese mythology states and is interpretated that way. I'm writtng this to broke the stereotype that all modern Polygenists are ignorant or opting for discriminations. Stay well I believe that you also have a good intentions and I oppose Wikipedia censorship not you as a person.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Uygur Brother (talk • contribs)

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Uygur Brother. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism.   ❯❯ 1sub Atomic   (💬Talk)  11:15, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

You may be restricted from commenting on your own talk page if you continue to vandalise other people's comments on here. AussieWikiDan (talk) 12:07, 7 October 2020 (UTC)~ I'm wishing you the best in your life and I am antropological guerilla against both racism and Wikipedia Lying censorship. I was just to withdraw from Wikipedia any way. A lot of success in your personal life.

Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. AussieWikiDan (talk) 10:34, 5 October 2020 (UTC) I only presented philosophy from reliable sources stay well and think about lying censorship that ideological line of Wikipedia implies

October 2020
You have been blocked from editing mainspace for a period of 1 week for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:43, 5 October 2020 (UTC) I did make a usefull contributions I cititazed reliable sources religious views such as Michael Creams book and Wikipedia is trying to silence people that quote reliable sources but don't suite their ideological line. You should learn a difference between contemporary science and philosophy. Stay well please and think about Lying Censorship