User talk:Uzo20

In regards to the removal of the picture gallery you placed in a certain article, it was removed because picture gallerys are not allowed.—  Dæ dαlus[mailto:Daedalus969@gmail.com →]quick link / Improve 20:26, 14 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure of your intentions, but I am noticing that you tend to edit a lot of Hungarian articles placing photographs randomly and undermining editorial progress by re-introducing removed or forked content. Wikipedia is a balance of written and graphical content.  Your continued insistence to insert these images may be considered disruptive by some editors.  When you reintroduce several paragraphs of forked or content you are not helping improve the articles.  Please be respectful of the contributions of others.  You may find editors more responsive to your contributions if you include an edit summary as outlined in WP:ES.  As well, discussing your concerns on article talk pages can go along way in persuading people into seeing your point of view.  Alan.ca (talk) 04:00, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Budapest article, your revert
Hello, I undid a revert you had recently executed on the Budapest article. Changes were made to the article after a discussion took place on the article talk page. If you have objections or concerns about the changes, it would be appreciated if you would express those concerns on the talk page before making an edit revert to the main article. Alan.ca (talk) 18:06, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Bazilika.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:Bazilika.jpg

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:02, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Bazilika.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Bazilika.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 02:29, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Galambok.jpg


The file File:Galambok.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused low-res personal image with no foreseeable use."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 09:37, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Eszterhazy4.jpg


The file File:Eszterhazy4.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Eszterhazy17.jpg


The file File:Eszterhazy17.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Vajdahunyad.jpg


The file File:Vajdahunyad.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Eszterhazy21.jpg


The file File:Eszterhazy21.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused, low quality. Superseded by files at c:Category:Schloss Esterházy (exterior)."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 04:08, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Hősök tere.JPG


The file File:Hősök tere.JPG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused, low quality. Superseded by files at c:Category:Millennium Monument (Budapest)."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 04:10, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Lanchid.jpg


The file File:Lanchid.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused, low quality. Superseded by files at c:Category:Chain Bridge, Budapest."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 04:14, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Nemzeti museum.jpg


The file File:Nemzeti museum.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused, low quality. Superseded by files at c:Category:Budapest Museum of Fine Arts."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 04:16, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Iparmuveszeti.jpg


The file File:Iparmuveszeti.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused, low quality. Superseded by files at c:Category:Exterior of the Budapest Museum of Applied Arts."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 04:17, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Jaki templom.jpg


The file File:Jaki templom.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused, low quality. Superseded by files at c:Category:Abbey church of St George (Ják)."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 04:19, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Szépművészeti1.JPG


The file File:Szépművészeti1.JPG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused, low quality, better files at c:Category:Budapest Museum of Fine Arts at night."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 09:10, 26 February 2023 (UTC)