User talk:VALIDALTguy

September 2018
This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. John from Idegon (talk) 06:36, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I was the one whose comments were removed John. You're targeting the wrong guy. VALIDALTguy (talk) 06:43, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Can you read the link before posting
U posted a link claiming I filed an Spi. I don't see any Spi that i filed. So what are you rambling about? You seem to be totally clueless on what you are speaking. You clearly are trolling here. -- D Big X ray ᗙ  07:08, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Sorry I only read your comment. That’s why I named you. I corrected it. VALIDALTguy (talk) 07:26, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Unblock account now
Zzuuzz I suggest you read WP:LEGIT - Privacy and instead of letting people use your action to delete accusations against themselves, try to take right actions against everyone. Even if others read it, someone who has been blamed shouldn't remove it. I'm not a real sock anyway, but I think me risking my long-time real-named account is stupid for this thing. VALIDALTguy (talk) 11:36, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Anyway unblock or not is up to the conscience of the administrators. VALIDALTguy (talk) 11:38, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Hello again. I'm sorry you took it so badly - there are different types of blocks and you received one of the most generous available. I'm not even bothered about pursuing any action against your other account nor even its identity. As Yunshui points out this is not a legitimate use of an alternative account. The policy you quote concerns "editing an article", moreover, it says it "should not be used in ways outlined in the inappropriate uses", and as I pointed out in my block reason WP:ILLEGIT #2 describes editing project space as an illegitimate use. This is a longstanding policy, confirmed in arbitration, and if it inconveniences you then as I say it's just tough. For the record I don't think User:DBigXray should be removing that content, but after examining it closely I came to the conclusion that there was more noise than signal and it wasn't worth reverting. -- zzuuzz (talk) 12:57, 6 September 2018 (UTC)