User talk:VLP + NP

June 2016
Hello, Welcome to Wikipedia. I have removed several additions that you made to the article Hillary Clinton email controversy because they lacked a citation to a reliable source directly supporting the text. Please take a few moments to read Identifying reliable sources, Neutral point of view, and Verifiability. You may also wish to read some of our other polices and guidelines. Thank you, and welcome. Neutralitytalk 16:11, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Hillary Clinton email controversy, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please read WP:RS and ask question about sources on the article talk page. - MrX 13:09, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Hillary Clinton email controversy. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Also, please use edit summaries to explain your edits. —MelbourneStar ☆ talk 14:10, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Gaijin42 (talk) 14:53, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
Your recent editing history at Hillary Clinton email controversy shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. slakr \ talk / 07:10, 17 June 2016 (UTC)