User talk:VQuakr/Archives/2009

Talk pages
It is permissible under the current policy for users to remove warnings from their talk page (it counts as an acknowledgment of the warning). The only exceptions are those of removing SharedIP tags and current block notices while the block is in-force. Thus, if you are warning a user with a blanked talk page, it is best to check the history to still be able to escalate the warnings appropriately. The applicable policy is here: Talk_page_guidelines. -MBK004 00:37, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Jminthorne (talk) 00:40, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

wp Oregon welcome
Welcome to WikiProject Oregon! If you'd like, you can add the WP Oregon userbox to your user page using this code: User WikiProject Oregon. Check out the ongoing and archived discussions at WT:ORE and be sure to add the page to your Watchlist. If you are new to Wikipedia, it's a good idea to browse through the core principles of Wikipedia as well. The project home page at WP:ORE has many useful links to get you started. The recent changes and recent discussions links will display recent edits on articles within the project's scope. Welcome! —EncMstr (talk) 17:27, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Fellow de-orphaner!
I noticed you added your name to the list of participants in WikiProject Orphanage. We really appreciate your help! The first things you could do to get started with us are: Of course, you may have already known all of this, in which case sorry for the spam. Either way, let me know if there's any way I can help you contribute more to the project! -- &oelig; &trade; 18:38, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Read the Orphan page, especially the section marked "Criteria". The page contains a lot of good advice to get you started, as well as the standard procedures we are using to de-orphan articles.
 * 2) Look at Orphan, and Article issues closely and make sure you know how to use them correctly. (It's not difficult, but it is easy to screw up.  Trust me, I have.)
 * 3) Keep de-orphaning! Category:Orphaned articles contains all orphaned articles organized by month and there is a large backlog we need to clear out so we appreciate any help we can get.

V–J day in Times Square
I've belatedly noticed your short comment at Talk:V–J day in Times Square. I'm finding it hard not to infer that this article on a photograph is dogged by somebody who dislikes a particular statue, and is keen to introduce material denigrating the latter. How this illuminates the photograph is hard for me to understand (but then so is most of the "human interest" stuff about the identity of the kissers). Edits such as this one have prompted me to write at more length on the talk page; your input would be welcome. -- Hoary (talk) 01:26, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, I had drawn similar inferences. I do not really have the background to contribute much to the article, but I will have a look at the discussion to see if I have anything to add there. Jminthorne (talk) 02:36, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:12, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Removal of PROD from List of German rocket scientists in the United States
Hello Jminthorne, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to List of German rocket scientists in the United States has been removed. It was removed by DGG with the following edit summary ' (a very notable group. There are many source available, both for each individual & for importance of this. See thefirst asee also article here for background.) '. Please consider discussing your concerns with DGG before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 21:53, 4 September 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)

Moon Hoax
It was good that you sourced the Van allen quotes, but it still needs sourcing regarding the "they were safe/protected etc." parts. you can always undo and redo with fact tags. it can't automatically stay until someone changes it because you believe NASA or something. thank you Sfvace (talk) 01:20, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
 * As far as I know, you are correct that any questionable statement lacking a source on WP can be removed without using the fact tag. My message to you was a request, not a demand since using a fact tag draws attention to that section of the article but is less disruptive. Since the article is currently being worked on by several other editors, one of them might have access to a source that they can use relatively quickly. Stated another way, editors do not necessarily know what needs a source, until they are made aware that a given statement is not universally undisputed. Jminthorne (talk) 01:49, 11 September 2009 (UTC)