User talk:VS6507/Archive 1

April 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Encyclopedia Britannica Eleventh Edition, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gaelen S. (talk • contribs) 08:30, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Talk:Spore (2008 video game) has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ~  Butros ( Talk ) 12:14, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Ivana Kurcmanović has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoy gabs adds 22:43, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Ivana Kuzmanović
A tag has been placed on Ivana Kuzmanović requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 23:16, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Tad Lincoln (talk) 23:20, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Ivana Kuzmanović
The article was deleted because it did not indicate how the subject was notable by Wikipedia standards. ... disco spinster   talk  13:47, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Workingterrier1.jpg
Hi I did not delete the picture you nominated, because firstly it is still used on these pages: and the comments on the commons do not match, in particular the person creating the picture is inconsistent Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:57, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Jack Russell Terrier
 * Working terrier

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Angela Tiger.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Angela Tiger.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the image can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the image. If the image has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  APK  (If You Wanna)  09:33, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Sookie_(TB).jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sookie_(TB).jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? PhilKnight (talk) 10:48, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Hello Aleksa Lukic
Please help translate a short part of Tan Son Nhat International Airport into Serbian Wikipedia. Thank you for your help. If you need any help in translating Serbian topics into Vietnamese, I will be ready to do.Genghiskhan (talk) 04:14, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ConQUIZtador
A tag has been placed on ConQUIZtador requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Eeekster (talk) 21:39, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Extensive type of agriculture
Is this the same thing as extensive farming? Kansan (talk) 20:22, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Page renaming
I have restored the two pages, Extensive farming and Intensive farming to their original names. These terms are in common use, changing the article titles is controversial, and requires more justification than an edit summary. If you wish to proceed with the renaming, please discuss your justifications for the move on each of the article talk pages, and hold off on the move until a consensus is reached on the talk pages. Dialectric (talk) 17:16, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks Aleksa Lukic (talk) 17:18, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

IMH belgrade
looks as if it's patrolled now  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  18:42, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Patrolling
I think you just do it  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  12:52, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Gingrich
Did you read my edit summary? The information I removed is irrelevant to his biography and is also weasel words, "some commentators say..." Thanks, Kaisershatner (talk) 14:10, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Scarlett GI Joe

 * User Doctorfacts is just going to keep on editing that

and Duke's page no matter what anyone says. The only answer to this is to block the page or to block that user. NamelessConsular (talk) 11:42, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Substing Welcome Templates
Just a quick note, can you make sure you subst welcome templates when you add them to a users talk page? Thanks =]  ·Add§hore·  T alk T o M e ! 18:56, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll try to. But, may you note me what is that important for — output of message is almost equal? Aleksa Lukic (talk) 19:52, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * If you simply put someone else has to go and change it to  so that the welcome template stays as a permanent message rather than a link to the template page. If you don't subst your welcome templates and the welcome template is change it is then also change on every page that has that welcome template on (unless substed) I hope you understand :)  ·Add§hore·  T alk T o M e !  19:56, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Maire Lynch
Hello! I've declined your A7 nomination of this article, as holding the title of "countess" is a credible claim of significance- this is a much lower standard than notability. If you believe that standard is not met, please take the article to WP:AFD. Thank you. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 11:50, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * But, date of bird is very significant for article; how do we threat articles about persons that not supplies date of birth information? Aleksa Lukic (talk) 11:54, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * We have almost 10,000 articles in Category:Year of birth missing- lacking a year of birth is not a grounds for speedy deletion, merely a sign that Wikipedia is a work in progress. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 11:59, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Shrek Forever After poster
Hi, I've reverted the image that you uploaded to the original verision. Under fair use guidelines, one side of the image has to be 300px or less. Cheers Quentin X (talk) 10:01, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome!
I appreciate it! To be honest it was a learning experience for me too. Cheers! — Tommy  2010 18:19, 26 May 2010 (UTC)



Tommy2010 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

IMH
Zao mi je, ali ne mogu i ne znam ti pomoci. Moj engleski nije toliko dobar za tako usku struku, Sumnjam da ces stici do dobrog clanka. MOgu samo da te uputim na WikiProject Serbia --  Bojan   Talk   20:33, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of screenshot
I do not know why your screenshot was deleted. You should ask User:Feydey, the administrator who deleted the image. Ground Zero | t 21:22, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

The copyrighted Windows desktop (all the icons etc.) cannot be claimed as own work. Making a screen capture is not the same as own work. feydey (talk) 23:35, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Actually copyright violations are deleted immediately. I have restored the image, please add proper licensing (now You actually have 7 days). feydey (talk) 15:51, 30 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Hello and thank you for your message. Unfortunately I don't know the image licenses and copyright policies very well. I can direct you to some pages for more information, Copyrights, Image copyright tags, and Media copyright questions. The Help desk is another place to ask. Hope this helps! Loves  Macs  (talk) 17:38, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

hello
zemljak, da li bi mi rekao koje si godište, da znam jesmo li vršnjaci. ja imam 14 godina --Стефан Немањић (talk) 10:41, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

hvala
baš mi je drago što sam upoznao mog vršnjaka. i mene su blokirali na srb viki. pazi se BokiceK on mrzi sve srbe. A što se tiče Rastka, i moja se mišljenja razlikuju od njegovih. --Стефан Немањић (talk) 17:42, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Uw-db template removing
Template:Uw-db template removing has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. m o n o  00:08, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Regarding this template, I've replied at WT:TW. Thanks & Cheers, Amalthea  09:47, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
╟─ Treasury Tag ►  stannator  ─╢ 10:30, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Gianni Giadresco
Hello Aleksa Lukic. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Gianni Giadresco, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: non-English pages can only be deleted under A2 if a link to the article at another project is provided. Thank you. A le_Jrb talk 11:57, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Hm, this is English Wikipedia. What is the point if we let non-english articles to stay. Does exist a db template for non English material? --Aleksa Lukic (talk) 11:59, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Non translated articles cannot stay forever here. Until when we can keep that article? --Aleksa Lukic (talk) 12:01, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey. Non-English articles are not valid for speedy deletion under any of our criteria, unless they are a copy of an article that exists at another language Wikipedia. As I have tagged the page, we have a Wikiproject where editors devote time to translating articles from other languages into English. If this isn't done in two weeks, then it can be deleted. We don't want to delete potentially valuable information, just because it isn't in English - we want to get in into English instead! Hope that helps. A le_Jrb talk  12:06, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

inre Articles for deletion/West Branch Children's Film Festival
Since the festival only has coverage in the township of West Branch, Michigan, it certainly does not (yet) merit an independent article. But as that township is the one place where it does have coverage, I've added a sourced paragraph to the West Branch article to specifically deal with that town's film festival. See West Branch, Michigan. Might you now support a redirect? Regards,  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 19:55, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem, dude :) Aleksa Lukic (talk) 09:11, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 18:27, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Your signature
Hey, your signature in this comment contained an image, which I'm afraid is expressly forbidden by policy. The reasons why are explained at WP:SIG, but the next section down explains possible alternatives. Thanks, HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   16:52, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I came here for the same issue, so I second HJ's comment. —DoRD (talk) 19:02, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I really didn't know it. I'll certainly be more careful in the future about things as such. For exp on Serbian Wikipedia user Maduixa always underwrites using an image (see). Although I comes from there (I have first been on Sr. when I first met with Wikipedia), I bring many things from there that are unallowed in here... Anyway, thanks for information!  Alex discussion 13:44, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Heh, I hate to point it out but a &lt;font size=5&gt; isn't particularly well received either. :) Amalthea  14:12, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * There writes "avoid", so I do not have to use font number "3" - it will look like this: Alex - it is more difficult to see the name. Font that is used in "Freestyle Script" originally has a little smaller words in a same font size used in fexp. Arial and other fonts.  Alex discussion 14:23, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * It's impossible to give strict rules since fonts and context differ. For example, many users won't have the font you chose. I, for one, don't, so here's how it looks for me. My signature renders with 11px height, yours with 19px – almost twice as high. The base formatting guidelines are: Don't make your signature overly affect line height, and don't make your signature draw too much attention. At the moment, I think your signature does not follow those guidelines, at least not for many users. This following would work, and is not hard to read:  Alex discussion 14:23, 21 June 2010 (UTC) The readability could be improved by increasing the contrast between font color and background color. Amalthea  15:04, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * But font size: 4 or 3,5 px may be OK?  Alex discussion 15:29, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Font size 3 is ok for me here, 4 should also be acceptable but it already increases the line height and thus goes against the spirit of WP:SIG. Fractions do not work in the size attribute, and the "px" is superfluous since you don't specify pixels, it will usually be ignored but best to leave it out. Amalthea  15:47, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

stub-sun
Greetings! A stub template or category which you created has been nominated for renaming or deletion at Stub types for deletion. The stub type most likely doesn't meet Wikipedia requirements for a stub type, through failure to meet standards relating to the name, scope, current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at Stub. Please feel free to make any comments at WP:SFD regarding this stub type, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first at WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals! This message is a boilerplate, left here as a courtesy, and should not be considered personal in nature. Dawynn (talk) 17:45, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank spam!
TFOWR 21:04, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

ako te zanima, pošto kažeš da imaš različito mišljenje od Rastka Poceste, rekao bih da si čuo za Jovana I. Deretića. zanima me da li podržavaš njegovu istoriju, ili istoriju Vladimira Đorovića. Ako nisi čuo za njega, pogledaj ga na YOU TUBE --Ћофи (talk) 08:36, 12 June 2010 (UTC)


 * jeli ti se javio Pocesta --95.180.20.197 (talk) 22:11, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked for 2 weeks for sock puppetry. Brandon (talk) 00:27, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I am certainly meeted with the my blockage on the Commons because of that. Is my block on there atomatically related to my block here? I cannot remeber that I used any plus account here. Regards  Alex discussion 17:06, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * For starters is yours. Also, you made some questionable edits while logged out. For privacy reasons (seeing as the information was gathered via Checkuser), I will not link to the IP publicly. You can email me if you like additional information, or give the "OK" to post your IP(s).  Tiptoety  talk 18:24, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Your userpage
Hi there. I went ahead and deleted your userpage per concerns regarding your age and the posting of certian private information (name, location, age, etc). This is done in accordance with Requests for arbitration/Protecting children's privacy, and in the interest of your safety. Please note that this is not a punitive action, and you are allowed to recreate your userpage. I just ask that if you do, you do not include your name, age, or location. For more information, you may want to read WP:CHILD. Cheers, Tiptoety  talk 00:31, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * All right. May you redelete my user page if I remove privete informations? My userpage is very dear for me, and it will be very difficult for me to remember all the items that were on my page. I will certainly remove the private informations from my page. Thank You  Alex discussion 16:36, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * That is fine. I can email you a copy of the code, and you can make the appropriate changes before re-creating it. Cheers, Tiptoety  talk 18:24, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank you very much. Please e-mail me with that information. And, could you tell me when and how can rollback rights been returned to me. I will remove my address and other private data from my page, and when I grow up to man, I will return it to my page. And, please see child's page: User:Wackywace RSVP  Alex discussion 15:15, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I have emailed you a copy of your userpage. As for the other one you linked me to, it does not include sufficient personal information to justify deletion. Tiptoety  talk 22:33, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of template TV series-stub
This template, which you created, has been tagged for speedy deletion because a similar template (tv-prog-stub} already exists. If you would like to discuss this, please do so at Template talk:TV series-stub. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 21:13, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

move to commons
Hi, I removed the move to commons template from as it is a fair use file and as such is not suitable for moving to commons, thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 23:13, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Djokovic
Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits. Thank you. I have reverted you edits on 2011 Australian Open as it is consensus that his name is written in English and not Serbian, as we do not have Serbian characters on our keyboards. The other reason being that this what he is known as in English speaking countries. KnowIG (talk) 19:21, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Different between plants and animals


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Different between plants and animals. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Plant. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Plant - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. andy (talk) 15:05, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I've userfied the material to User:Aleksa Lukic/sandbox per your request.  Acroterion   (talk)   21:13, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Fritzl case
Your edit is POV ("Due his inhuman, violent and outrageous acts..."). Harry the Dog WOOF  11:07, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, but that's true (what other you can say for the man who raped and harassed his own for 24 years (keeping her in prison), for the time making 6 alive and one child who he killed after birth!
 * Maybe we could remove the POV part, if you agree?  Alex discussion ★ @ 19:50, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * It's already there with a reliable source and no POV. Harry the Dog WOOF  08:34, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Samuel Fraunces
You recently cautioned 71.58.75.28 about disruptive editing on Thomas Hickey (soldier). I left the below message on Talk:Samuel Fraunces.


 * GramereC / 71.58.75.28, Please stop your disruptive editing.
 * 1. No one is interested in your fantasies about the portraits. That's why I moved them to the bottom. Note, I did not erase them.


 * 2. You have repeatedly blanked the "Ethnic Identity" section. People ARE interested in what Fraunces Tavern Museum has to say about Fraunces's ethnic identity. The statement from the museum's Website is a summary of its findings based on decades of examining the issue.


 * 3. You have repeatedly blanked the "Presidential Household" section. People ARE interested in Fraunces's service in George Washington's presidential households.


 * 4. You have repeatedly blanked the "See Also" section. This links to information about Fraunces and the enslaved Africans who worked under him.


 * 5. You have been cautioned about disruptive editing elsewhere. You have made more than 100 edits on the Samuel Fraunces article in the past 3 weeks. And your intolerance of the opinions/contributions of others, your introduction of fantasies presented as facts, and your imperious blanking of whole sections of information is the DEFINITION of disruptive editing.


 * 6. I am sending copies of this message to the BOT who cautioned you, and those who reverted your blanking of others' work.


 * Someone else (above) urged you to go back to your own Website, where you can write whatever you want. I concur. 173.59.124.196 (talk) 00:05, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

List of My Pony Characters
I understand you reverted List of My Little Pony characters. But I actually removed some of the info there because the whole page is getting bigger and bigger in file size, making it harder to edit. I understand this however....but I'm worried about what would happen to the page when it gets clogged.Blackgaia02 (talk) 09:06, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Mehdi mahdloo
Hello Aleksa Lukic. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Mehdi mahdloo, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a test page. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 13:22, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 * It is semi-bold, and unwikied. Alex discussion ★ 13:24, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 * And unsourced, too. Alex discussion ★ 13:25, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 * That's all true, and it makes some fairly improbable claims as well, but none of those are reasons for speedy deletion. WP:CSD is for pages where it's clear the author didn't actually mean to make an encyclopedia article, and that's not the case here. The thing to do with this (which I have done) is tag it with unreferenced and hoax and ask the author for sources, telling him about WP:V. It could have been given a WP:BLPPROD tag, as an unsourced BLP, but I looked in IMDb and the guy does exist so it would be easy to provide a basic reference. I shall do a bit more checking and then probably PROD or AfD if it is clear that the exaggerated claims are false. Although he exists, it doesn't seem the guy is notable; if he was, one could cut the article back to a verifiable stub.


 * I was meaning to give you a word about another recent tag, on that talk page which was an advert for a sex shop: while the message you used about talk pages not being a forum for general discussion is normally right, the WP:Articles for creation system involves the draft article being put on a talk page (for some reason I don't understand), and this was one of those. I replaced your message to the author IP with one that just said WP was not for advertising.


 * There is good advice for speedy taggers at WP:10CSD and WP:A7M. Keep at it: New Page Patrol is one of the most important activities on Wikipedia.


 * PS - I see you've given it a BLP-Prod - quite right, despite what I said above. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 13:50, 26 August 2011 (UTC)


 * I was meaning his promotion of sex shop is appropriate for one forum, not for (even) talk page in the encyclopedia. Alex discussion ★ 13:52, 26 August 2011 (UTC)


 * OK, I understand. I deleted it per WP:CSD anyway. JohnCD (talk) 13:55, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

NTC Libya article
Hi, as your move of the NTC article is controversial, please follow WP:BRD and for controversial moves follow WP:RM. As another editor has reverted your move, it is controversial, and further article moves may see one getting blocked for edit warring, and this should be avoided by all editors. Let me know if I can be of any help. --Russavia Let's dialogue 20:14, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Hello, regardless there is only one article named National Transitional Council, it is not correct at all to not leave a space for other National Transitional Councils of other states. I am currently working on an article about Congo's National Transitional Council, and in immediate future, there'll have to be both separated articles: National Transitional Council (Libya) and National Transitional Council (Congo), as for correctness however. I hope you understand intention of my actions. Alex discussion ★ 20:40, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Heya, I have no doubt to question your intentions. It is great to see that you are working on the Congolese council. You will still have to do this via WP:RM, as consensus among editors could possibly see the Libyan article staying at National Transitional Council, with a note at the top of the article redirecting editors to the Congolese article. Take a look at how this occurs at the top of Dmitry Medvedev, with the note on the Hero of Russia. Or there may be other NTCs that have articles created on them, whereby National Transitional Council (disambiguation) could become necessary. It all depends on whether consensus among editors is that the Libyan NTC is the primary topic for National Transitional Council or not. It just requires discussion is all, k? :) --Russavia Let's dialogue 21:21, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, let's discus then! :) Alex discussion ★ 21:25, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Help with photos?
Hey again, as you are possibly in Serbia, is there any chance that you may be able to help with photos that I require, as listed at User:Russavia/Required_photos? Any help with those would be appreciated. --Russavia Let's dialogue 21:23, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 * You mean me, to take a new photos of Belgrade, Serbia? Alex discussion ★ 21:27, 26 August 2011 (UTC)