User talk:Vabio1

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Jeff Frederick Public Headshot.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Jeff Frederick Public Headshot.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Angus McLellan (Talk) 14:24, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Editing and referencing
I'm glad to see that your recent edits are now in the spirit of Wikipedia, substantially editing the text to improve fidelity with the references and adding references to support your text. Thanks! --Zeamays (talk) 14:52, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your help and cooperation. Vabio1 (talk) 15:31, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

I looked at the Toddy Puller article today and saw that on 6 October you inserted a campaign smear, "After she wrote him asking for a divorce, he committed suicide in 1994,..." I have corrected the record from a published biography of Lewis Puller. Inserting such a smear is not appropriate behavior on Wikipedia. Were you hoping to win an election by distorting the truth? Is that the best a Republican supporter can do? --Zeamays (talk) 14:53, 9 November 2011 (UTC)