User talk:Vacant0/Archive 1

Welcome!
Hi, Vacant0. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Abani79 (talk) 11:22, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Democratic Opposition of Serbia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Regionalism ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Democratic_Opposition_of_Serbia check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Democratic_Opposition_of_Serbia?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:05, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Serbia 21 moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Serbia 21, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. buidhe 10:32, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Barnstar
Dear Vacanto, thanks a lot for the barnstar! I'm really honored. All the best :) --WEBDuB (talk) 19:04, 29 June 2020 (UTC)


 * No problem! Vacant0 (talk) 21:44, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Serbian literature
Zdravo, I have worked a bit on the Serbian literature page. Please join in if you have the time.  Sadkσ  (talk is cheap)  23:45, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United Opposition of Serbia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Regionalism.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Montenegro Parliament 2020.svg improvements
Hi, thanks for uploading diagram of seats distribution in the Parliament of Montenegro after the 2020 election. If you would add a lighter shade of orange presenting DCG-led list MPs, to make it easier to distinguish from the DPS list, also it would be better to add #fd00ff for presenting SD on the graph, for the same reason. With those changes the presented parties and coalitions would be easier to distinguish on the graph/diagram. Also see much lower resolution graph i created; File:2020 Montenegrin parliamentary election (seats).png -Thank you, Walter II, 18:10, 31 August 2020 (UTC).

October 2020
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Serbia and Montenegro; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  20:44, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Cabinet of Zdravko Krivokapić
Hey Vacanto, feel free to add information into User:Elserbio00/sandbox if you like as I have started preparing a page titled "Cabinet of Zdravko Krivokapić" which I will publish once the new gov is formed. CheersElserbio00 (talk) 15:48, 6 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Thanks, I'll try to add information when I'm free! Vacant0 (talk) 17:01, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Reverted edit on SNS article
Why did you revert the adding of allegations of crime and corruption in the page? I think that, we both know that it's true. However Wikipedia dictates that all data on it must retrieven from trustable sources. Is it biased, lacks a neutral point of view? No. The section is clearly labelled "allegations". Is it poorly sourced? No. Is it irrelevant? No. All is directly linked with the party, and is significant to note, these are major affairs that describe how it is in reality, because otherwise it sounds like an usual political party in some western country, which it is not. Original research? No. All data is given from the sources. Attacking tone? That's absurd. Please give a reason for why did you revert the edit, otherwise you might be suspiciously affiliated with them in some way or another. I hope not. That's immoral. I really doubt however, that deleting 12000 bytes from a page is in good faith. Please prove me otherwise.

Све најбоље, LukaAndjelkovic (talk) 00:29, 15 November 2020 (UTC)


 * I recommend creating a separate page about the controversies/allegations of crime and corruption about SNS and after finishing the page link it to the main SNS article with some text that will explain controversies/allegations in detail. I'm guessing that the page will be really long and I don't think that every single information should be on the main SNS page especially when it's really long. I'm gonna try to help if I can. Vacant0 (talk) 01:39, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Why did you delete the entire section instead of moving it into an another article? LukaAndjelkovic (talk) 01:02, 15 November 2020 (UTC)


 * I reverted the edit because I think that something controversial like that should be discussed on the talk page first, my recommendation is to create a separate page for this and I want an opinion from you and others that regularly edit the page. If you agree that the "controversies/allegations" section should be moved to another page then great, but if you don't then give me a reason why it should stay on the main page. At least, in my opinion, something controversial like this should be discussed first, and then after discussing the topic the work should begin. Vacant0 (talk) 02:09, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

I agree completely that it's controversial (I wanted to write that in the first response but forgot hehe), my only concern was that while undoing the content you didn't move it anywhere. But then I realized I can get the historical source code of the page, so that's not a problem. How should the article be named to be neutral? I thought it was better to put it all in the main page to create a more accurate impression for the reader, who might otherwise dismiss it as unimportant. I think it would be the best to include a summary of the affairs and nature of the party in the main page, possibly as an Template:Excerpt (it's a good way to avoid repetition among two related articles, in my opinion better than the copy-paste method, which may lead to the part in one page being updated in one page, while remaining outdated in another) from the separate page you have suggested. To help it further match with reality, I think that party's ideology and its "right-wingness" should be disputed as well in the main page, as I said in its talk page (similar to what various others said in the past, however they were all left unconcluded. As the party continues to govern, I think it would be more and more obvious that it does not really have an ideology. However that's an another but related topic.) Pozz, LukaAndjelkovic (talk) 02:14, 15 November 2020 (UTC)


 * I recommend naming the article "SNS-related allegations of crime and corruption" and I also agree that the main page should include a summary of the affairs. I'm gonna help you with it whenever I'm free. The political position of SNS is disputed and that goes the same for the ideologies in the infobox but let's leave it like this for now. I'm gonna try to add more information about the party since there is only a little amount of text on the page. Vacant0 (talk) 13:29, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

I made the article, SNS-related allegations of crime and corruption. Please try to contribute on it, or at least participate in the talk page, as, you know, some people may try to take it down. Go through the article and possibly find something that is not in neutral point of view, it might be attempted to delete the entire article even for a minor mistake.

Хвала унапред, LukaAndjelkovic (talk) 03:37, 16 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Thank you, I will try to contribute whenever I'm free. Vacant0 (talk) 16:16, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: High School "Nikola Tesla" (Pančevo) has been accepted
 High School "Nikola Tesla" (Pančevo), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=High_School_%22Nikola_Tesla%22_(Pan%C4%8Devo) help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Bkissin (talk) 16:22, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gymnasium "Uroš Predić" (Pančevo) has been accepted
 Gymnasium "Uroš Predić" (Pančevo), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Gymnasium_%22Uro%C5%A1_Predi%C4%87%22_(Pan%C4%8Devo) help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Bkissin (talk) 21:27, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:DSSLogo new.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:DSSLogo new.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:37, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dveri flag.png
Thanks for uploading File:Dveri flag.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:39, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Vacant0! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 22:18, Tuesday, February 2, 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ku Klux Klan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nativism.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Picture
Hi, Vacant0. I was wondering why is Mihailovic's head partially cut off in this new image you uploaded. The old one was certainly better. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 18:37, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Some user decided to upload a higher quality version of the same image so I decided to just cut the sides off. I totally prefer the older image though since there's more space at the top and it isn't cut off. It would be better if you can revert it to the older version since the uploader got blocked for uploading non-free files. Vacant0 (talk) 19:40, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I don't consider the image to be any higher in resolution. If it is, it's only marginally higher. I hadn't noticed that the user had been blocked. Feel free to revert the user and restore the previous image when you have the time. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 20:25, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you, gonna do that now. :) Vacant0 (talk) 20:52, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

PRI Authoritarianism
On the PRI page, you claimed that authoritarianism was not an ideology, and you removed the edit. However, I would argue that authoritarianism is considered an ideology by Wikipedia. For one, on the PRI page, technocracy is listed as an ideology, when technocracy and authoritarianism are both ways of running a government. Also, in other wikipedia pages, authoritarianism is listed as an ideology. See Rwandan Patriotic Front, Democratic Constitutional Rally, Cameroon People's Democratic Movement, Gabonese Democratic Party, National Patriotic Party, People's Democratic Party of Tajikistan, Democratic Party of Equatorial Guinea, National Democratic Party (Egypt), National Congress Party (Sudan), Reformist Democratic Party, Uzbekistan Liberal Democratic Party, Rally of the Togolese People, Rally of the Togolese People, National Democratic Party of Liberia, Mauritanian People's Party, Sudanese Socialist Union, Social Republican Party, Socialist Destourian Party, National Union for Independence and Revolution, Nationalist Liberal Party, National Renewal Alliance, Conservative Party (Guatemala), National Royalist Movement, People's Union of Kazakhstan Unity, Patriotic League (Estonia), Progressive Action Party, National Revolutionary Party of Afghanistan, National Partnership, Coalition for Democratic Change, Peliquista Party, Lithuanian Nationalist Union. Additionally, on the page List of political ideologies, Authoritarianism is listed prominently. From this, I think it is clear that your undo of my edit was misguided, and I hope I have swayed you on this issue. SteelSmasher93 (talk) 22:30, 4 March 2021 (UTC)


 * By official definition "Authoritarianism is a form of government" and it isn't an ideology, this can be seen in the Authoritarianism article as an example, so no Wikipedia doesn't consider it as an ideology, even though it's stated in the "List of political ideologies" article, which is wrong. The source that you added states that "Brutal crackdowns on civil protests, such as Mexico’s 1968 Tlatelolco massacre, which saw security forces open fire on student demonstrators, earned the PRI a reputation for authoritarianism. Its popularity began to suffer". I agree with this completely, however, this should be added somewhere on the page and not in the infobox, since this article mentions PRI's past. All of these pages that you've stated above have Authoritarianism in the Infobox and they have to be fixed. My edit wasn't misguided at all, "Authoritarianism" should not be included in the infobox since it isn't an ideology. Thanks Vacant0 (talk) 22:45, 4 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello. In your first statement, you say that authoritarianism is a form of government and not an ideology. This begs the question. Why can a form of government not be an ideology? Technocracy, which is listed in the infobox on ideology, is a form of government. Not only is authoritarianism listed as a section in the list of political ideologies Wikipedia page, on its own page's infobox, it lists authoritarianism as one of two "power ideology" axes. You also seem to be making two different arguments here. One is that authoritarianism is not an ideology, and the other is that the PRI can no longer be classified as authoritarian. I would say that the second argument has more standing, but I would still say that it's an authoritarian party. I can not see how you can say that authoritarianism is not an ideology, but technocracy is. Can you please elaborate on the distinction between the two? Thank you SteelSmasher93 (talk) 03:44, 5 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Authoritarianism nor Technocracy aren't ideologies, they are a form of government. If you have some reliable sources claiming that PRI promotes authoritarian policies then I would with no doubt add it to the article. I'll fix the article now. Vacant0 (talk) 19:46, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Yugoslavian vs Yugoslav
Hi Vacant0. Isn’t Yugoslav ethnicity and Yugoslavian nationality? Like Serbian or Serb, Croatian or Croat, Slovenian or Sloven? Just wanted to understand the difference. Cheers OyMosby (talk) 15:59, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Yugoslav and Yugoslavian have the same meaning. A Yugoslav Serb is the same as a Yugoslavian Serb, same goes for a Yugoslav Croat and a Yugoslavian Croat. Vacant0 (talk) 16:04, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * So bizzare. How do you know which one to use for nationality then? I had Yugoslavian and you changed it to Yugoslav. I always thought Tito was trying to creat a Yugoslav ethnic identity. Sort like how a bunch of Slavic tribes united to form Poland. Yugoslavia even copied Poland’s anthem hehe. So wanted to know when to use whoch as nationality. It’s confusing me lol. OyMosby (talk) 16:11, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * You could use either Yugoslavian or Yugoslav, it doesn't matter. I prefer using Yugoslav just because of how it sounds. Just to give you a couple of examples, on Aloysius Stepinac's, Vladimir Dvorniković's, Ivo Andrić's, Aleksandar Petrović's and Borislav Pekić's page Yugoslav is being used. So in the end, it's your preference. In the case of Ivan Meštrović, I changed it because of the infobox. Vacant0 (talk) 16:22, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * No worries I’m fine with tour preferred edit. I was just wondering if there were specific scenarios for either. Thanks. OyMosby (talk) 16:47, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Movement Republika logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Movement Republika logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:49, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Law and Justice
Hi Vacant0, I know I recommended that you make a bold edit, but I feel like it could have been clearer if your edit summary had mentioned that you had tried to start a discussion but that people were responding to something else instead. That way, I think the user who reverted you might have been more understanding. Thanks, Ezhao02 (talk) 12:28, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Hey, yeah I think I made a mistake there in the edit summary by not mentioning that. I'll let the discussion go until more editors agree on Autospark's preference. Vacant0 (talk) 13:05, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I think that's a good idea. Hopefully this issue can be fixed soon. Ezhao02 (talk) 13:18, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Re: Milan Bandić
There is still a lot of work needed on the article and it's a bit too soon since his death. I don't think there is any politician with a GA article in the Balkans area, that would be hard to achieve on Bandić's one. Tezwoo (talk) 22:28, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I agree on that too and afaik there aren't any modern Balkan politicians that were promoted to GA. I was just curious because Bandić's article was requested for GA multiple times, but I don't think it will become a GA unless someone gives a lot of attention to it. Thanks for your response Vacant0 (talk) 22:42, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

FET y de las JONS
Hi. I have reverted an edit of yours on this article, and would like to remind you about WP:BRD. When your Bold edit has been Reverted by another editor, the recommended next step, if you continue to think the edit is necessary, is to Discuss the dispute on the article talk page with other editors, but not to re-revert it, which is the first step to edit warring, a disruptive activity which is not allowed. Discussion on the talk page is the only way we have of reaching consensus, which is central to resolving editing disputes in an amicable and collegial manner, which is why communicating your concerns to your fellow editors is essential. While the discussion is going on, the article generally should remain in the status quo ante until the consensus as to what to do is reached (see WP:STATUSQUO). Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:29, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for telling me about WP:BRD, I'm not going to do this in the future. I'll start a discussion tomorrow and I'll explain my previous edits, you're free to join if you want. Vacant0 (talk) 23:34, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I'll see you then! Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:40, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Ranko Alimpić
Vacant0, I can use your help with this article. For starters, I'm wondering if the picture in the sr.wiki can be moved to Commons, and I see that you have some Commons experience; I'd appreciate it if you could assist. And then the article itself needs some work... Drmies (talk) 01:46, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello, the picture can be moved to commons and be sure to add the template. I'm glad to help and if you want, I can re-work the article. Vacant0 (talk) 11:31, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Well, if you can move that picture, that would be a great start--I have no experience with that at all--thanks! Drmies (talk) 14:24, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I've moved the picture. No problem Vacant0 (talk) 14:49, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks. The sourcing remains a problem--I don't think there's anything more that I can find (in English) to verify even basic facts. Drmies (talk) 00:02, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello, there are sources and books in Serbian. I'm going to read them first and then I will add them to the article. Vacant0 (talk) 09:40, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Know Nothing (American Party)
Hi, I understand the instinct to clarify the Know Nothings as "right-wing" populism, but while the populist part is clear from WP:RS, the right-wing aspect is less so. The modern left-right divide is harder to discern in around 1850s U.S. political identities, and while a lot of what the Know Nothings advocated does align with the modern right and far right, so does what the Democrats, Whigs, and Republicans of the day advocated. Carter (talk) 13:29, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello. It was a mistake of mine to add that since I know that the left-right political spectrum today isn't the same in the 1850s/1860s United States. It does align with the modern right-wing and far-right but I know that it's wrong to call them like that even though they were a 19th-century party, not a 21st-century one. I appreciate you commenting, I'm gonna try not to make these mistakes in the future, don't want to embarrass myself again. Vacant0 (talk) 13:38, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
 * No troubles, it was a logical edit, just one that's been hashed back and forth several times already. ☺️ Carter (talk) 13:45, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah I've noticed that. It would be good though if you can add a comment there in the article to let people know that consensus was achieved already so that in the future these changes won't happen. Vacant0 (talk) 14:43, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Good idea, . ✅ Carter (talk) 16:25, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Removal of sourced content
Hi, some users are removing imense content with POV of Neo-nazi anti-serb hatred gaming, could you see this? thank you very much https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serbophilia
 * Hello, the content from that page was removed because most of the sources contain original research, which per Wikipedia rules isn't allowed. In the case of this article, books are mostly preferred as a source, and the source must include that the person was a Serbophile in some way or another. Thanks, Vacant0 (talk) 13:44, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Removal of sourced content on the article of Montenegro-Serbia relations
Hi, I don't understand what's the issue with you undoing every change I make? First, it was reasonable, I did not cite the sources well, then I put them in and you give a subjective judgement on how they are not reliable, yet I don't understand by which criteria do you say that one country's public service broadcaster is reliable whereas another's is? Seems a bit like you are trying to push a certain narrative, whilst you are not open to being objective, which after all is the goal of this website, especially when it comes to English Wikipedia, and not specific national ones. Issues between the two countries need to be addressed on the page as they always have been, just because you personally don't like it, that is simply not a reasoning that's valid enough.
 * Hello. There are a lot of issues with this article, and the article has to be re-written. The contemporary relations and By theme sections aren't well-written at all, and they are mostly sourced by tabloids and sources that do not meet the reliable source criteria. Your edit to the lede didn't have any sourcing behind it, and the rest was badly sourced. RTCG and other Montenegrin websites and tabloids tend to be biased in some ways, and for that reason, we can't use those sources here in this article. This also goes for Serbian tabloids, such as Kurir, Blic and online blogs/tabloids that can be biased in these kinds of situations. Your edits can get added back when the article gets re-written, only if the information is proven to be reliably sourced. If you indeed have sources for that text, you can leave the sources here and I will then add it back when the article gets re-written. Thanks, Vacant0 (talk) 14:39, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Undiscussed changes
Hi. Sorry for opening another discussion here about removal of sourced content. On your talk page, this is the third discussion of that kind in less than 24 hours, but my problem has nothing to do with your recent editing activity. I have been looking for people who are familiar with Serbia because they could best deal with this problem. There is an IP who has been habitually disrupting this template since March 21. It is claiming that the government of Serbia is not reporting the number of recoveries, and it has tried at least once to remove several of those numbers from the template. I felt the need to undo those changes because there has been no discussion about that problem until now, but it insists that those numbers should be removed. I know that you have not edited that template before, but since you could be familiar with how COVID-19 figures are reported in your country, I want to know if there is any truth to the claim of the IP. Thanks. LSGH (talk) (contributions) 04:50, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello, the official government-run COVID-19 website in Serbia doesn't state the number of recoveries, however, websites like worldometers and coronatracker do. I don't think that it's necessary to state the number because the government hasn't reported it, so you can remove it if you want to. Vacant0 (talk) 09:54, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I also don't see the need to calculate the number of recoveries, though the people who also updated the chart during the early months of the pandemic have been doing that almost every time. I'm not sure which date should be first affected by the removal because the other people who updated the chart after mid-July did not change how they did so. There were similar removals in Belgium and Slovakia, but in those cases, all dates were affected. LSGH (talk) (contributions) 10:28, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I recommend you to revert those edits by the IP editor so that it can be discussed there on the talk page, I will join the discussion and I will ask other editors to come too. Vacant0 (talk) 12:42, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Yesterday, I already reverted another edit of that IP, but it cannot stop editing the chart. I'm using the same website that you linked here, but I cannot recall if the way it looks now is different from how it looked in July last year. I don't want to stop updating the chart because of one IP, but if disruption persists, what else do you think could be done? LSGH (talk) (contributions) 10:03, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
 * If the disruption continues, and by that I mean if the IP editor continues to remove information without prior consensus, you can warn them. This page lists the warnings that you can use. A discussion has to be started on the article's talk page if the IP editor continues to revert edits. Prior to March 20, the chart seems to look the same as of now. Vacant0 (talk) 11:26, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
 * It looks like it stopped yesterday. Anyway, from what date should the removal begin? LSGH (talk) (contributions) 05:49, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm not an expert but my opinion is that the removal should begin when it was first written (March 13, 2020) Vacant0 (talk) 11:40, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I have not yet looked at press releases by the government of Serbia, but someone did this yesterday. It works for the meantime, but I do not know why he chose July 16 as the date from which active cases were changed to hospitalisations. LSGH (talk) (contributions) 01:20, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure too, I'll look into it. Vacant0 (talk) 11:02, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Visoki Dečani vandalism
some ip is vandalizing the article, can be solicited block for only account users to edit? Thank you Venizelosagnin (talk) 19:47, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello, pages can be protected only in cases of high-level vandalism, edit warring, disruptive editing, sockpuppeting etc. You must not revert more than three times in a period of 24 hours, and if you violate this rule you can get blocked for at least 24 hours. To avoid edit warring, you can open a discussion on the talk page. Vacant0 (talk) 19:59, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
Hi Vacant0! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at 2024 United States presidential election that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. ― Tartan357  Talk 21:08, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

List of military disasters
Hi.

Because you are experienced editor I wanted to ask you something regarding processes that handle dispute resolutions. For several months now there's ongoing discussion about inclusion of battle of Vukovar on this list. Editors reached dead end until user started RfC. I thought this would solve things but RfC expired because no one answered and I don't know what is the next best course of action. Should we wait for someone to comment and resolve the problem? Is it possible to start another RfC? I fear that if no one comments or solves the issue the entire discussion will be archived and removed while the controversial addition to the list will remain. I also asked for help before but no one replied. Thanks. Istinar (talk) 09:49, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello, the most recent RfC was opposed by most of the editors, however, consensus wasn't established and we didn't really get anything from it. You can contact any of the listed WP Military history coordinators here about this, and I recommend waiting between a week or two to start another RfC, but prior to that, I recommend contacting a coordinator first. Vacant0 (talk) 21:42, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I'll do that. Istinar (talk) 10:36, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Hey, just wanted to let you know I tried contacting editors at Wikiproject Military history but no results . Don't know why no one responded, maybe because lead coordinator of that project is involved in this particular dispute and is supporting claims that are not backed by sources that he misquotes ? Don't know. What do you think should be next step? I would start another RfC, but I'm not sure how and I don't know if new RfC will be tied to conversation about this issue that is ongoing on talk page of article in question? Or do we have to repeat all arguments in new RfC? Istinar (talk) 10:59, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
 * You can open another RfC if you want to. Vacant0 (talk) 22:22, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Rollback granted
Hi Vacant0. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3AVacant0 enabled] rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! ~  ONUnicorn (Talk&#124;Contribs) problem solving 22:40, 16 April 2021 (UTC) ~  ONUnicorn (Talk&#124;Contribs) problem solving 22:40, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

RFC Notice
This is a friendly editor notice that an RFC has begun about an "Wait" !Vote for In the news/Candidates. You can see the discussion by clicking here. Elijahandskip (talk) 13:10, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

HI
You reverted my undo.

This guy has edited a fictional movie character into a scientific article.

I disagree with your assessment that my edit was "un-constructive" and believe that clear vandalism should -- in fact -- be reverted

Could you look over this situation and solve this issue for me?
 * I've restored the previous stable version. I accidentally reverted your edit instead of another one. Hope its fixed now, Vacant0 (talk) 17:43, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Mas Madrid
Could you please edit back Mas Madrid to Center left to left wing? that article isn't reliable enough to cite Mas Madrid as far-left and Mas Pais which is the political party they go by in Spain is cited as Center-left to left wing i don't understand the reasoning behind citing them as far left for just one random article that doesn't even explain why they are far-left?
 * Center-left has to be sourced. Vacant0 (talk) 19:01, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

The project of Mas Pais was born in Madrid which is already cited as center-left i don't know what more you want? Also that article isn't reliable enough to cite Mas Madrid as far left
 * You've added center-left without providing any reliable sources besides it. It has to be sourced, otherwise, it cannot be included. --Vacant0 (talk) 19:08, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Mas Madrid is the madrid regional version of Mas Pais which is already cited as center left with reliable source in the mas pais page, if we have hundreds of pages with PP and PSOE regional wings and their ideologies being the exact same i don't understand why can't it be the same for Mas Madrid which is the regional version of Mas Pais? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enricc1 (talk • contribs) 19:13, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Center left isn't sourced either on Mas Pais page.--Vacant0 (talk) 19:18, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

A random blog saying they are far-left and not explaining why they are far-left is not exactly a very reliable source either.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enricc1 (talk • contribs) 07:14, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

National Assembly
''Why does List of current members of the National Assembly of Serbia redirect to the 2016–20 parliament composition? Is there a page for the 2020 one?''

There isn't, no. I was holding off on creating a new "List of Current Members" page until I'd finished writing articles on the individual members. I'm conscious of the irony that the assembly might be dissolved before then. Obviously, I won't object if someone else creates the page first.

For what it's worth, the "List of current members" page redirected to the list of 2014–16 members until August 2018 (when I created the page for the 2016–20 members). CJCurrie (talk) 10:22, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I do not plan on creating it but we should obviously wait, the parliamentary elections might be held next year so if they ended up announcing when it's going to be held by the end of this year then we can create the page for the current list of MPs. Also, thanks for your work over the years, creating and writing those pages can be hard sometimes. --Vacant0 (talk) 10:39, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Regarding an article
Hi, just wanted to requests you that if possible, kindly take a look at "George H. W. Bush 1992 presidential campaign" created by me, and suggest some points helping me in improving the article in its peer review. Thank-you! Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 17:19, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello, I'll take a look at the article asap. Cheers, --Vacant0 (talk) 19:48, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:29, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Independents Movement (Cyprus)
Hi, sorry for my question, I don't understand how Αλλαγή Γενιάς could be traslated as "Independents Movement" (and not as "Generational Change")... --151 cp (talk) 00:30, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello, it seems like per WP:COMMONNAME that Independents Movement is used as an English translation, 1, 2, 3. --Vacant0 (talk) 09:43, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
 * "Independents Movement" seems the old name ("Ανεξάρτητοι", uppercase "ΑΝΕΞΑΡΤΗΤΟΙ", transl. "Independents"). The Independents’ Movement that was represented in the House by Anna Theologou announced that according to the political parties law, it had to register the movement as a political party with the same emblem but the name was changed to Generation Change (source). --151 cp (talk) 11:57, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
 * It seems like it they did, I haven't checked that. The page can be moved to either "Generation Change" or "Anex", it depends what is more sourced so that it can fit WP:COMMONNAME. If both of these aren't sourced enough then we can use the Greek romanized name. --Vacant0 (talk) 12:00, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Media and drama Good Article nomination
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Reginald Barclay&#32; on a "Media and drama" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 00:30, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Social sciences and society Good Article nomination
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Der Deutsche Canadier&#32; on a "Social sciences and society" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 01:30, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: History Good Article nomination
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Pravarasena II&#32; on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 02:30, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Hardcore (punk rock and heavy metal subgenre)&#32; on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 03:31, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Social sciences and society Good Article nomination
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Raymond Riles&#32; on a "Social sciences and society" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 04:30, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

SmalforaGiant
This banned user, who mainly edits on topics related to far-right, pursue their disruptive edits with 3 anonymous IP on many articles like Fidesz and others these last days. Since you have more relationships with administrators than me (eg: quick interventions and page protections on Yamina and Israeli New Right after message that you let on Deepfriedokra's talk page), can you ensure that these IPs are blocked and the pages in question protected? They are a banned user and all their edits should be reverted. I tried to alert on the return of this banned user, but the admins don't care and ignore my requests 1, 2 --Martopa (talk) 12:36, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I will check what's going on with those pages, thanks for letting me know. --Vacant0 (talk) 12:41, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Let me chime in that I think there's a serious problem at hand here. It seems quite probable that this is the same person who got blocked for a week on 16 May 2021 for disruptive editing, but then talked their way back almost immediately by feigning repentance:
 * I've added this one, as well as one other likely IP address, to the three listed by Martopa in the investigation opened on 22 June. I'm also asking that the article on David Stoll be semi-protected, especially since it's a biography of a living person and seems to be one of the current focuses of attention by this banned editor. - Eb.hoop2 (talk) 14:31, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I've RfPPed that page, the page will probably get protected once an admin sees the case. --Vacant0 (talk) 14:42, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I've RfPPed that page, the page will probably get protected once an admin sees the case. --Vacant0 (talk) 14:42, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Mike Gravel
Thanks for nominating, I was surprised he was so old. RIP. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 15:53, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * No problem, Gravel indeed had a long career. --Vacant0 (talk) 17:15, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:DRASTIC&#32; on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 19:30, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Template talk:Nashville, Tennessee&#32; on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 03:31, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Jimmy Savile&#32; on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 03:32, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Serbian Patriotic Alliance
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Serbian Patriotic Alliance you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amanuensis Balkanicus -- Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 19:21, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Wikipedia technical issues and templates request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Template talk:Britain's Got Talent&#32; on a "Wikipedia technical issues and templates" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 15:31, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Serbian Patriotic Alliance
The article Serbian Patriotic Alliance you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Serbian Patriotic Alliance for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amanuensis Balkanicus -- Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 17:02, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Made some minor improvements after the article had passed. Nothing major. Nice work, once again. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 17:06, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I appreciate it. --Vacant0 (talk) 17:08, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:President of Venezuela&#32; on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 06:30, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Wikipedia technical issues and templates request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Template talk:Metal Gear chronology&#32; on a "Wikipedia technical issues and templates" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 13:33, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Far-right politics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Obraz.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football&#32; on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 20:30, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Al Jazeera Media Network&#32; on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 15:31, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Wikipedia style and naming request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Afghanistan&#32; on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 01:31, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Nicki Minaj&#32; on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 03:32, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Juice Wrld&#32; on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 15:30, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Template talk:Infobox comics character&#32; on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 01:30, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: WikiProjects and collaborations request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Wikipedia talk:Did you know&#32; on a "WikiProjects and collaborations" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 19:31, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Wikipedia:Village pump (WMF)&#32; on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 04:31, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Patriotic Komitas Union of Montenegro
[] Both sources do not say that Miroslav Škoro sings anti-Serbian songs. Both you and Слободар should be reported to the admin in order to invent and add what is not written in the source. This needs to be deleted by someone right away, I can't because it's semi-protected-93.136.0.168 (talk) 13:52, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Benazir Bhutto&#32; on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 16:30, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard and &#32; Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on "WikiProjects and collaborations" request for comments. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 06:33, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)&#32; on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 20:31, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Republic
Dear Vacant. First of all: Dennik N and Trend are NOT tabloid media. From the Slovak Wikipedia about Trend: TREND is a Slovak weekly on economics and business, intended mainly for readers operating in the economic sphere and business. It has been published since 1991 (the first issue was published on November 6, 1991). In the print and internet version, etrend.sk informs about economic and political policy in Slovakia, finances, activities of business entities, analyzes and comments on international events affecting business. And about Denník N: Denník N is a Slovak daily, originally only an internet medium, which was created after the departure of some members of the SME daily editorial board in 2014. The editorial office deals with investigative, more analytical and extensive texts, and at the same time produces brief and fast news. The medium is financed mainly from payments from subscribers. The Denník N has also been in printed form since January 2015 [1] and since 2017 it has also been publishing the monthly N magazine [2].

2nd. Sources spoke of top members of the movement. All members are the former most popular politicians of the ĽSNS. ĽSNS is considered by everyone to be neo-nazi on the wiki as clearly neo-nazi. The leader Uhrík, the former ĽSNS vice-leader and righthand man of Marian Kotelba, who, among other things, admitted to the idea of ​​Nazi checks for 1,488 euros, of which Kotleba is oficially convicted. Vice-Chairman Mazurek, oficially convicted of defamation of race. Among other things, he is known from a video where he throws paving stones at Muslim women. Vice-Chairman Ďurica, singer of the neo-Nazi group White Resistance, who was also recognized by the COURT literally as a neo-Nazi. Miroslav Suja, Vice-Chairman. It is publicly known that worked for the head of the Slovak mafia Mikuláš Černák.

Those articles talk about these members. It is clear from this that they are neo-Nazis. I know that own research is not allowed, but at this point we simply do not have better resources about their ideology. Because even those sources are sometimes inspired by Wikipedia. I think it is obvious that the movement is Nazi, the sources are credible and correct.

Thank you for answer. :) --Igec133 (talk) 14:05, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

By the way. User I had an argue with deoes edits like this: Progressive Slovakia: Difference between revisions. Pure vandalism.--178.143.110.88 (talk) 18:31, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Marilyn Manson&#32; on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 21:31, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Wikipedia talk:Piped link&#32; on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 00:30, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Cardi B&#32; on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 14:32, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Natalie Portman&#32; on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 20:30, 23 August 2021 (UTC)