User talk:Vacvape

Re: Requesting Deleted Patent Nonsense
Hello, I'm wondering about your reasoning for wanting a copy of this article; it doesn't seem to have been created in good faith. If I'm happy with your answer to this question, I could email you a copy of the article if you set up an email address in your preferences. Graham 87 14:14, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi,


 * I have setup an email with the account, thank you. That entry was not in good faith. It's by a cult of thieving frauds who stole a decent concept from me but are too incompetent to even be able to explain it at all reasonably. So we see such things as "sublimation from liquid", and "demolecuralization" 'inator, and "degasifier", and I guess sooner or later they'll pin the tail on that donkey as the monkeys with typewriters complete Shakespeare. Until then I guess they'll keep on trying. I'm not surprised they are here trying to inject their poison into the mainstream. Pulling themselves up by their scientific diapers. The emptier they are the heavier they get.


 * It has to be said that the drug delivery products they're here marketing as medical devices are ill conceived, ill designed, and injurious, in large part due to their criminal negligence and gross incompetence. Deal with them as you would any ridiculous cult.

Vacvape (talk) 15:01, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 * OK, I've emailed it to you. The notice on my user page is not a binding promise, and I can follow it (or not) at my own discretion. You've seen the crazy messages I received about this article, so I was a bit suspicious of your motives; also because of those messages, I was wary of making the article publicly available. I prefer replies to go to my user talk page (as it says on the notice at the top), though if you hadn't sent a message there, I would've eventually gotten the reply here because your user talk page is on my watchlist. Graham 87 01:48, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks. It's all very understandable. Tip of the iceberg stuff I assure you. I was careful to request a private copy since the efficient excision of such loathsome festering social cancer is absolutely appropriate. You very well might consider locking the sublimation page..


 * And I'd like to say that I found the Emerson's quote on the banned user's talk page. It's one I hadn't seen from him before but I found a deep appreciation for it.


 * You people do great things.
 * Cheers


 * Vacvape (talk) 16:58, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I'll keep an eye on it. I can't protect it right now because it hasn't been re-created, but I've put it on my watchlist. Where's the Emerson's quote?
 * Also, replies to talk page messages go at the end of the appropriate section, not at the beginning, where you've been placing them. There also indented with colons. Graham 87 04:01, 20 November 2014 (UTC)


 * User talk:96.21.82.28 Warning by Mitch32 shows the following quote: "The imitator dooms himself to hopeless mediocrity." It's germane.
 * I was referring to the sublimation page which was also vandalized, not the one that was deleted. There's an army of multi level marketing victims out there who really want to conflate it vaporization, because that's what they fallaciously named their product for purposes of misdirection as with any snake oil.
 * At least they have a home on YouTube where they were linking to. Unfortunately they share no desire for the integrity of information or the markets affected by the poisoning of it. They help proliferate frauds like cancer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vacvape (talk • contribs) 14:34, 20 November 2014 (UTC)