User talk:Vader.is.my.homeboy

August 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Marc Benioff has been reverted. Your edit here to Marc Benioff was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YFEgzfb_LBY#2014) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:00, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Mata Amritanandamayi
Do not keep adding the Namo quote to the article. It's WP:UNDUE as far as her bio is concerned. &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 16:32, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Can you help me understand what is the bias in this case? The Prime Minister is a prominent figure. The claim is singular that he praised her charitable works - verifiable. It speaks to a single prominent figure's commentary on her charitable works. Would it be unbiased to add in a detracting statement? Isn't that the point of the criticism section? Or, are you saying that the statement should read something more like "charitable works have been lauded by global political figures" and reference the various articles citing each person (if it was more than one)? I'm pretty new at this so I'm not entirely sure if I'm just posting something wrong - technically, or if I'm just way off base with what I'm posting.--Vader.is.my.homeboy (talk) 02:56, 1 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Please read the aforementioned guideline. It's not a matter of being correct/incorrect, but staying relevant. "charitable works have been lauded by global political figures" and reference the various articles citing each person (if it was more than one)?" - This would do! On a related note, we have Wikiquote for quotes. &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 08:04, 1 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Okay, that makes a lot of sense. I'll work on this and get more references to various political figures.  Although, this makes me wonder if every other edit I've made on other pages is probably just as inappropriate. I'll have to review them as well. Thanks!  Vader.is.my.homeboy (talk) 18:47, 4 October 2016 (UTC)