User talk:Vadszederke Agnes Modis/January 2011 - December 2011

Speedy deletion nomination of Beast (dog)


A tag has been placed on Beast (dog) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject, contest the deletion by adding  at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and give your reasons on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Miyagawa  (talk)  19:10, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Beast
I would advise you that a line or two in Mark Z's article is all that is merited by this pet. Notability doesn't cascade down. If the dog bites Barack Obama and then decides to move in with Rhianna, then possibly an article might be merited. Possibly. As the dog doesn't appear to have done anything yet except exist in its own doggy way, I'm afraid the redirect will stand. Peridon (talk) 19:03, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Peter Gervai


The article Peter Gervai has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Eeekster (talk) 21:14, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Tudod, nem azzal volt a bajom, hogy törölted, bár nem kellene a saját finnyásságodat másra erőltetni, ha nem értesz egy viccet. Az nem tetszett, hogy levandáloztál, mert wikikörnyezetben elég erős sértésnek minősül. Tettem én is annyit a wikipédiáért, mint te, talán nem kéne vandálokkal egy kategóriába sorolnod. – Alensha   talk  19:02, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Bocsi, hogy durván beszéltem veled, csak a „vandalism” jelző felidegesített és ilyenkor túl hirtelen reagálok :) Az elnök urat meg majd inkább röhögtetem személyesen, ha legközelebb látom :) üdv, – Alensha   talk  20:24, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Survey
Hi Módis!

I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!

It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!

Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!

Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 22:14, 30 September 2011 (UTC)