User talk:Vag2

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * Welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style


 * Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page to follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons' policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring and sock puppetry.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism, doing so will result your account or IP being blocked from editing.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

Vangelis petsalis
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Vangelis petsalis, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://users.otenet.gr/~vag2.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:36, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

January 2011
The article Vangelis petsalis has been deleted. Apart from the copyright issue mentioned above, the article was written in purely promotional terms, which would in itself have been sufficient grounds for deletion. Before writing any more articles, you would be well advised to read Wikipedia's guidelines on notability, particularly the one referring to notability of notability of people, and also the guideline on reliable sources. In addition, if you have a close connection to the subject you have written about then you are probably not the right person to do so, as you have a conflict of interest. If the subject is genuinely notable then someone independent will probably write an article on that subject. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:46, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Vangelis Petsalis
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Vangelis Petsalis, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://users.otenet.gr/~vag2.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:46, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vangelis Petsalis


The article Vangelis Petsalis has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:21, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Vangelis Petsalis has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:NqcHcyl2MKQJ:musicsprings.wordpress.com/2010/05/04/on-classical-discoveries-at-wprb-wednesday-may-5/+vangelis+petsalis+wprb&cd=6&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=gr&client=firefox-a). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link.  Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:32, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Vangelis Petsalis for deletion
The article Vangelis Petsalis is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Vangelis Petsalis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:15, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

You should vote
You should vote Keep on the article if you want it to be kept: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Vangelis_Petsalis

I just noticed that it was going to be deleted and think that the composer is notable.

Just put Keep before your comment. Nipsonanomhmata (talk) 18:27, 11 January 2011 (UTC)