User talk:Vahurzpu

Welcome!
Hello, Vahurzpu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! - Nott Nott  01:53, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Vahurzpu! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 01:57, Monday, February 26, 2018 (UTC)

Re your removal
On 23 April 2018  You removed the fact that Dorothy Dietrich was proclaimed the "first lady of magic" way before a latter day female magician, partly because "the citation is a tabloid". This does not change the fact that legendary magician Dorothy Dietrich was described with that reference many years before and it was most likely copied from her. No woman in magic, for even the shortest amount of time, would not be aware of the position Dorothy Dietrich has forged in the business as a early groundbreaking pioneer female magician. You as well!

That said women magician is not even in the business and has fallen by the wayside for many years as far as I can tell.

http://www.dorothydietrich.com/FirstLadyOfMagicFemaleHoudini.html ‎

Respectfully Dick Brookz The Houdini Museum, Scranton, PA magicus@comcast.net

April 2018
Hello, I'm Samf4u. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to .30-06 Springfield wildcat cartridges— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Samf4u (talk) 01:39, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: C.S. Monroe Technology Center has been accepted
 C.S. Monroe Technology Center, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! -- RoySmith (talk) 17:33, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=C.S._Monroe_Technology_Center help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

False positive
Sorry about the false positive. I'm new to edit filters, and didn't correctly consider the consequences of mine. Anything with Dan should be able to go through now.— CYBERPOWER  ( Chat ) 21:55, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN. Since you had some involvement with the Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed,Rosguill talk 18:14, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Going through WP:JCW much?
You seem to be doing a lot of citation-related cleanup/fixing recently. Are you making use of WP:JCW for it, or are you search for problematic citations through other means? &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 11:08, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I have been using JCW, specifically the potentially problematic patterns page; I don't know of any other method that would allow me to find issues so quickly. Vahurzpu (talk) 16:28, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Thought so. I was doing some similar cleanup, and I noticed you took care of several of them already, so I though the coincidence was too high. I usually take care of the following Within a day or two of database updates, so don't spend time on those. Everything else is too numerous for me to quickly tackle, so help there is always appreciated.
 * A Publication of...
 * Digital libraries
 * Identifiers (I'm skipping the ISBNs, so do feel free to tackle those)
 * Legalese
 * Official Journal
 * Peer review
 * Special Issues
 * Weird stuff
 * Curly ’

Anyway, watch the page, I've been tweaking patterns. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 05:23, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Howard W. Gill
I want to say thanks for 'Wiki-ing' that portrait of Howard Gill, on the Worthpoint. I think Glenn L. Martin(the Martin in Lockheed-Martin) might have had it and recalled his friend Gill whose life was cut short in a crash. Koplimek (talk) 17:37, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 September 15 § Template:Use shortened footnotes
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 September 15 § Template:Use shortened footnotes. Peaceray (talk) 05:58, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Nick Thorne talk 08:18, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Re: Attribution on translations
Hey, thanks for your advice. I will do this in the pages I translate.--Limesa143 (talk) 19:08, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Agglutination test (November 7)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spicy was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Agglutination test and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Agglutination test, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Agglutination_test Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Spicy&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Agglutination_test reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spicy (talk) 23:39, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

BotApproved
Wait for the bot flag before unleashing the bot. usually takes care of that pretty fast though. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 04:53, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * ✅  bibliomaniac 1  5  05:25, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Vahurzpu, please have the bot link to the BRFA in its edit summaries. Thanks. Primefac (talk) 10:55, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Winnie ille Pu
— Maile (talk) 12:02, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Moving parenthetical citations to short footnotes
Hi. The decision at the RfC was to deprecate parenthetical citations to short footnotes, not tags. If you wish to convert the article similar to its parent article Actuary, by all means, but please do bot blithely use tagged format. Thank you. -- Avi (talk) 06:29, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Please see detiled instruction on how to properly convert parenthetical citation to shortened footnotes at commons:File:Converting Harvard citations to shortened footnotes (sfn).pdf. Please also see WP:SFN & Help:Shortened footnotes. Peaceray (talk) 06:40, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Neither the RFC closure statement nor Citing sources refer to any particular successor format; rather, both state that conversion should be "into currently accepted formats". That being said, I don't object to someone converting the article to use short footnotes; I was just converting from a deprecated format to a particular well-supported one. Vahurzpu (talk) 06:43, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

User:Vahurzpu/Parenthetical editnotices for deletion
On User:Vahurzpu/Parenthetical editnotices for deletion, most of the articles had been converted to either all or predominately shortened footnote style, but the editnotices had not. I took care of updating the editnotices for those articles to Shortened footnote editnotice. There were a couple which were mixed style or all regular footnotes, & I took care of blanking those editnotices.

The only one that was on the list that truly had been parenthetical referencing was Wah-wah (music), which you converted to regular footnote style. Only when I have the time, will I revert it then immediately set about converting it to the shortened footnotes that will better suit the original editorial intent.

There was a historical inaccuracy in that shortened footnotes were lumped in with the Parenthetical referencing editnotice. This was corrected last fall. However, not all editnotices have been updated yet.

I will note that the the Parenthetical referencing editnotice does state If you have previously used this template for pages using the shortened footnote citation style, please switch to the Shortened footnote editnotice. Similarly, the Use Harvard referencing template states Please consider using shortened footnotes or another citation style instead, and forgoing the use of this template. I believe that shortened footnotes are generally the best replacement for parenthetical / Harvard referencing.

Thank you for your patience with this. Peaceray (talk) 06:53, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for cleaning up those editnotices. I don't intend to convert any more articles in the future, but I'll keep your note in mind if I end up doing so. Vahurzpu (talk) 07:00, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Variety magazine
Hello Vahurzpu, you helped me obtain a Variety page in the past on the ResourceExchange, and I was just wondering is this something you were able to find through the Wikipedia Library? I'm going far back in time at this point to 1980 for The Empire Strikes Back, and my best luck has been on Gale, but that only goes back as far as 1997 in terms of full text. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 20:54, 20 April 2021 (UTC)


 * I found it via ProQuest, and at least some subset of ProQuest is available via the Wikipedia Library. However, I typically use my university's subscription, since it's more convenient for me; it's very possible that the article was within the scope of my university's subscription but not TWL's. Vahurzpu (talk) 21:16, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Hmmm...I think I did try ProQuest but perhaps my searching was not as precise. Plus the document you got for me was post 1990 so perhaps it's just easier to get more recent stuff. Thanks for the information Vahurzpu, I'll put it to good use! Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 21:22, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes it's my fault, I was just using the default ProQuest search instead of under magazines. There's like 91000 articles here. Thanks Vahurzpu. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 21:45, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Law of 4 February 1794
Hello! Your submission of Law of 4 February 1794 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Clarityfiend (talk) 05:01, 31 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Nothing too major.

DYK for Law of 4 February 1794
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Thank you! Much appreciated.

HarrisonFisher1982 (talk) 20:15, 24 June 2021 (UTC) 

Unexpected twist (for me)
Hey. Not sure if you were aware of yesterday's WP:AN (perm link). Just noting how strange I found how this incident unraveled — "only part time in an institution ... unsupervised internet access" — what? I really shouldn't jest about such matters. Still, never a dull moment! PS: I've been to well over half the states in the US, but by far, I've spent the most time in Virginia. Beautiful state. Many fond memories. Best, El_C 01:18, 6 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Yeah, that whole situation was pretty confusing. A user in the Discord server (the only one of the regulars there not linked to any particular on-wiki user) posted that link and mentioned their suspicions about potential association with Klaus Bells, as well as the other hoax articles. From there I was able to dig up enough evidence to verify the connections. I will note TNT's closing comment on the SPI, and that Klaus Bells's explanation doesn't seem entirely consistent with their behavior.
 * I believe it's the most complicated scenario I've waded into so far in my editing career, and it's not over yet. It raised serious doubts about the reliability of "blastingnews.com", which is used hundreds of times across the wiki, and I believe there's still one more account and one more hoax out there, though I'm waiting a bit for more evidence. Vahurzpu (talk) 03:17, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Correction: multiple more hoaxes out there; someone just pointed out a couple more to me. Vahurzpu (talk) 03:40, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Oh? Please let it be Rhodesia-related! Anyway, feel free to email me any evidence you wish to keep private at this juncture. El_C 04:37, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Bhutan–Turkey relations


A tag has been placed on Category:Bhutan–Turkey relations indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 19:30, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Reversion on Unusual articles
Thanks for this reversion of one of my edits. It looks like it was an unrecognized misclick on my part. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 17:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your bot's edits to Talk:Ryan Watson (politician)
Hello Vahurzpu - I have noticed that VahurzpuBot has edited Talk:Ryan Watson (politician) several times since September, incorrectly "Remove redirect-class assessment from non-redirect" when in fact the article IS a redirect. Please fix whatever error your bot is making. Thank you,  PK T (alk)  15:31, 16 December 2021 (UTC)


 * @PKT: Sorry about that; I've fixed the issue. It appears that the page was not technically a redirect. For a proper redirect, the "#REDIRECT" line must come at the very beginning, but the short description was interfering with the software recognizing it. Per Short description I've moved it to stop that problem. The bot shouldn't mess with it any more (unless it's converted into an article); please let me know if it does. Vahurzpu (talk) 18:11, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Perfect - thanks very much!  PK  T (alk)  19:05, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Vahurzpu!


Happy New Year! Vahurzpu, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Abishe (talk) 21:07, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 21:07, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Anti-Judaism: The Western Tradition


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Anti-Judaism: The Western Tradition requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kleuske (talk) 22:05, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Removing redirects from non-redirects
It would be cool if your bot, while it was at it, could also remove redirects from non-redirects since other bots and editors don't. wbm1058 (talk) 20:20, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

False positive?
Hi @Vahurzpu, in your bot removed a redirect-class assessment from a redirect, that's currently waiting waiting for RevDel. Is that intended? Nobody ( talk ) 05:53, 16 June 2023 (UTC)


 * @1AmNobody24: nope, not intended. I just updated the bot so it should skip things marked for RD1 in the future. That being said, I'm not too worried about it, since once the redaction is complete and the page is a true redirect again, the template will automatically sense that the page is a redirect. Vahurzpu (talk) 06:00, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I see. Thanks for taking a look. Nobody  ( talk ) 06:03, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi Vahurzpu. If you wanted to expand the scope of task 1, you could remove redirect from all pages, because redirects are always detected automatically so there is no need ever to specify this &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 17:01, 3 June 2024 (UTC)


 * I considered doing this originally, but it would massively expand the scope of the task (editing hundreds of thousands of pages rather than a small handful per week). Also, at least when I wrote the bot, a few templates (MILHIST's among them) couldn't auto-detect redirects. That being said, I think their template now is WPBannerMeta based, so maybe this would no longer be an issue. Vahurzpu (talk) 22:19, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Would you be willing to open a BRFA to see if we can get approval for this big job? &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 17:21, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
 * I'll take a look later this week when I have some time. Vahurzpu (talk) 01:13, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Drone congregation area
Aoidh (talk) 00:03, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

VahurzpuBot: Removing incorrect redirect class failure - Fixed
VahurzpuBot's task "Removing incorrect redirect class" failed to run per the configuration specified at Bot activity monitor/Configurations. Detected only 0 edits in the last 1 week, whereas at least 1 was expected. If/when the issue is fixed, please change the section title (e.g. append " - Fixed") or remove this section completely. When that is done, this notice will be reposted if the bot task is still broken or is re-broken. If your bot is behaving as expected, then you may want to modify the task configuration instead. Or to unsubscribe from bot failure notifications, remove the notify parameter from the template. Thanks! – SDZeroBot (talk) 17:20, 19 February 2024 (UTC)