User talk:Vaibhavafro/Archive 1

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - Ahunt (talk) 12:23, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

June 2019
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Arihant-class submarine, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. —Gazoth (talk) 22:22, 14 June 2019 (UTC)


 * You must be referring to this edit. That is 100% sourced. You didn't read the source properly. The author of that column is none other than Admiral Arun Prakash, former Indian Navy Chief. &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 10:56, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Vaibhavafro, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Varunastra (torpedo) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Gazoth (talk) 22:33, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
Your addition to Indian Navy SSN programme has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. —Gazoth (talk) 20:16, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
 * That was a good faith edit. I had tried my best to reword the content to avoid copyright. Thanks for the advice and sorry for replying so late.— Vaibhavafro Talk  06:08, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

I think you should curtail your actions a bit. Most of the time, you are roaming around Wikipedia deleting good faith edits. Many of your reverts are totally wrong. As an example, see this edit of yours.— Vaibhavafro Talk  13:31, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Uri: The Surgical Strike. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. ''Diff: We don't need personal editorials, like describing an award as "prestigious". We're not here to fawn over a film's accomplishments. Please use neutral language going forward. Thank you.'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:53, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Understood.-Vaibhavafro, 14 Aug 2019
 * Thank you, and I know you meant no harm by it. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:36, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Images
Bro can you upload a full picture of INS Arihant and other submarines of its class. The previous image that you've uploaded is not of fine quality? Ritvik0 (talk) 00:10, 5 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Remember PM Modi announcing the first deterrent patrol of Arihant? A poster of Arihant was on the wall behind his back. No clear picture is available of that poster. However, this picture is the cropped version of [this] picture. This is the BEST one can do. Vaibhavafro (talk) 02:10, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Image
Can you upload the picture from a different site? Ritvik0 (talk) 05:17, 5 September 2019 (UTC)


 * A more clear version is NOT available anywhere. That is the BEST ANYONE CAN UPLOAD! Vaibhavafro (talk) 05:58, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

You can upload it from the another source Today I was trying to do this but I was not able to do it so I request you that please upload it from another source by searching it in the internet. Ritvik0 (talk) 06:39, 5 September 2019 (UTC)


 * We can upload only those files which are released by the Indian government by using proper licenses. And rest assured, THIS IS THE BEST WE CAN UPLOAD OF ARIHANT. There is nothing else which can be uploaded under government license. Vaibhavafro (talk) 07:43, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to Milhist!
 Hello  and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:


 * Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
 * The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can [ watchlist it] if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: WPMILHIST Announcements.
 * Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you [ watchlist it].
 * The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
 * We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
 * We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
 * If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
 * If you would like to receive the project's monthly newsletter, The Bugle, please sign up here.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:21, 10 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Thank you! &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 01:49, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Special Group (India)
Hello! Your submission of Special Group (India) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 14:07, 11 October 2019 (UTC)


 * ✅; please comment now. &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 15:39, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Glad you agree. But only the reviewer can place an icon. Best, Yoninah (talk) 17:38, 14 October 2019 (UTC)


 * I am sorry. Didn’t know that. &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 17:40, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also: Mz7 (talk) 09:21, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sandeep Unnithan (October 26)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sandeep Unnithan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sandeep Unnithan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sandeep_Unnithan Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Utopes&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sandeep_Unnithan reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes (talk) 02:10, 26 October 2019 (UTC)


 * I am not surprised since I was expecting this as a possibility. Most of the discussion about Sandeep Unnithan's extraordinary work exists only on Indian defence forums, where enthusiasts like me discuss about how ONLY he gets to know about top-secret Indian military stuff first. If in future a reliable source writes about Unnithan extensively, I would definitely create an article. Thank you, &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 02:46, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello Vaibhavafro! I don't mean to minimize the importance of Unnithan; in fact, I hope for the opposite. As the article was written at the time of the submission, there was no assertion of notability. Expanding on the fact that "he gets to know about top-secret Indian military stuff first" would be a great start. However, I hope you understand that somebody who only writes one book, and co-authors one other, isn't enough to warrant an article at that point. With more information in the article demonstrating more notability, I'm sure that the article about Unnithan could be approved. Thank you for understanding, Utopes (talk) 03:01, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

I need some advice here. Sandeep Unnithan was the first to write about-
 * The classified details of INS Arighat, S5-class submarine, K5 and K6 missiles. See this.


 * First to disclose the presence of the top secret K missile family. It has been speculated that a K-missile test had been undertaken yesterday due to NOTAM and NAVAREA warnings issued from “23-25 October for a flight test”. If true, we will see a Sandeep Unnithan article soon.


 * First to write about the ultra-secret Mavericks in 1999.


 * Much more

But, there are no WP:RS that clearly state that he was the first. We, the Indian military enthusiasts have concluded this at forums using common sense. A simple google search will reveal that nothing detailed was written before Unnithan. So, can I proceed with adding this in the draft? &mdash;  Vaibhavafro  &#128172; 04:23, 26 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Anyways, I have requested deletion of the draft since I am expecting a NO in answer. Regards, &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 04:40, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

If you have time...
Hi there. If you have time, please give this article a look over - Indian Military Academy. It is a GA nominee just now and I really hope to make it to GA status. Any suggestions to improve it? Check the talk page for an idea of what I mean if you are not sure, an admin had given pre-GA suggestions which were really helpful. Can you think of any other ways to imrove the article? Thanks. DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 13:36, 30 October 2019 (UTC)


 * That is already covering the topic quite extensively as far as my personal knowledge of the subject goes. However, I think that a few more historical images are needed. Try and check commons or the army website/twitter for any image that is more than 60 years old and upload it to commons under PD-India. You can also check the PIB gallery. Regards, &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 00:41, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the suggestion. DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 08:54, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Agni-V, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Centre for Air Power Studies ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Agni-V check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Agni-V?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:19, 3 November 2019 (UTC)


 * I have fixed it. &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 10:32, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: SSS Defence has been accepted
 SSS Defence, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Utopes (talk) 04:10, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=SSS_Defence help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.


 * Thanks! &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 04:42, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

I am so not going to be given autopatrolled rights
Lol. Thanks for putting my name on the permissions page but I doubt I am going to get it just now. Thanks. DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 10:21, 5 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Yes that's partly my mistake. I should have just said that you created 75 Articles (and not mentioned that 14 have been deleted). &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 12:39, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Vaibhavafro, Oh even then, not mentioning the 14 makes little difference, the checking is done well.
 * That aside, thanks for starting with Navy Day (India) and pointing it out. I've started making a few changes, will try to get it more into shape in the coming few weeks before this years Navy Week. DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 07:04, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
 * And the autopatrolled thing worked out!!!!!!!!!!!! Yay. Now comes the hard part.... With great power comes great responsibility. DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 08:47, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Yeah exactly. Even I went ahead and read WP:BLP only after I was (surprisingly) granted reviewer rights... And thanks for starting work on that article. &mdash;  Vaibhavafro  &#128172; 09:17, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Autopat is of no help for you, it is of help to other WP:NPP users who will no longer patrol your articles, assuming that you know your shit. So any misses that you make while creating new article, will likely no longer be verified and fixed. You are on your own now. you should also check out that NPP page to see what kind of check they do and make sure your articles already include those things or else your articles will miss them. regards. -- D Big X ray ᗙ  07:58, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
 * DBigXray, this sounds like such an anti-climax!Confused.png I could ask someone to revoke this then!... Just kidding. I will see what check the NPP users do. Thanks for the heads-up. DTM (talk) 10:20, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Special Group (India)
Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

 * As you might have seen on my user page, I still consider myself a newbie. I don’t know any of the candidates and therefore will not consider voting. Thank you. &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 04:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Image question
I was typing my response when you removed your post. I didn’t think your question was silly at and wasn’t bothered by it. I also wasn’t offended by the request you made on my behalf for me to get OK’d as auto patrolled. I just never considered asking for such a user right. If it makes things easier for others than I’ve got no problem with getting it. Anyway, here’s what I was going to post about the image. This is just my opinion and other may feel differently.Hide the image from the article, click “Show preview”, and then read the relevant section of the article. Try and be honest when doing so and try pretend as if the image doesn’t exist. If you’ve got no real problem (again try and be honest) understanding the corresponding article content, it’s unlikely others will have any difficulty understanding as well without seeing the image. This means that it’s likely not going to be considered to pass WP:NFC.What you write in the non-free rationale is important, but it’s not as important as what’s written in the article. I look at this photo and I see some soldiers doing something; soldiers usually can be found in places where military operations take place and I don’t need to see an image to understand that. It would be much better to have sourced critical commentary of the image itself in the article. If the image is historic, then there should be reliable sources calling it historic. There are lots of events that are historic, but that doesn’t automatically mean that photos of said event are also historic as explained in WP:ITSHISTORIC. — Marchjuly (talk) 12:53, 21 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Thank you for responding. If I instead use it in the Operation Blue Star article, will it satisfy WP:NFC? That article already uses an image in fair use. If your answer is no, I will request speedy deletion. &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 13:16, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

A user has already disputed it's rationale as: "Photo is not the subject of significant sourced commentary. Usage fails to meet WP:NFCC." Changing the article to Operation Blue Star should solve this, shouldn't it? &mdash;  Vaibhavafro  &#128172; 13:22, 21 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Leave it. I have tagged it for deletion. Will use external media instead. &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 13:46, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Simply changing the article where the image is to be used won't matter if there's no real context to justify it's use. As I mentioned above, images of historical events are not necessarily historical images, at least not when it comes to non-free content use on Wikipedia. You'll have a much better chance of convincing others that seeing the image is important to the reader's understanding of the article if you can find critical commentary about the image itself in reliable sources and add that content to the article. A newspaper article about the operation which shows the image is not really helpful, but a newspaper article about the image itself and perhaps how it being released help shape public opinion or caused some kind of controversy would be very helpful. You've asked about this below; so, perhaps he will further clarify why he feels the file doesn't meet NFCC#8. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:52, 21 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Thank you Marchjuly. I fully understand now why this image can't be used under fair use. &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 14:11, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your understanding. I don't have anything additional to say as Marchjuly has covered this qite thoroughly. -- Whpq (talk) 14:57, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Special Group personnel at the Golden Temple during Operation Blue Star.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Special Group personnel at the Golden Temple during Operation Blue Star.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:54, 21 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Whpq, will changing the article (in which the image is used) to Operation Blue Star solve the problem? &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 13:29, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Thankyou for reviewing the rationale of that image. I have tagged it for deletion. &mdash;  Vaibhavafro  &#128172; 13:47, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

SG

 * Can you share the link of the url you found this image above ? thanks. -- D Big X ray ᗙ  07:59, 24 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Here. Also note that this image comes from a highly credible source: Sandeep Unnithan. &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 08:41, 24 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Thanks for sharing. I wasn't aware of this, so I am glad that I know about it. I was under the impression that SFF were the SF group involved in Bluestar. but now this makes more sense. -- D Big X ray ᗙ  08:59, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

I just want to tell a few more things since you've shown interest. That Sandeep Unnithan article clearly mentions The Mavericks to be (he distinguishes SFF from SG). What this means is that these people on Quora are clearly Bullsh*tt*ng. What happens next is that people get confused between SFF and SG and make unwanted ad hoc edits to Wikipedia. We need to keep an eye on this (especially since I am about leave for a Wikibreak, you will have to help).

Furthermore, after the reading and comparing all WP:RS on this topic with all WP:Not Rs, I have come to the following conclusion: SG was initially formed as 4 Vikas of the Special Frontier Force, but later became a separate unit. Afterall, what else can explain the transition to this badge from this? &mdash;  Vaibhavafro  &#128172; 10:11, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I will keep an eye. it will be helpful if you also copy paste this on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Indian military history task force to attract more eyes.-- D Big X ray ᗙ  10:56, 24 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Ok. I am posting all this there. &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 14:04, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

FYI
Hi Vaibhavafro,

It isn't against policy to remove messages from one's own talk page (for IP's and accounts both). It just indicates they've been read. --Floquenbeam (talk) 18:31, 26 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Will keep that in mind. Thanks for letting me know. &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 19:50, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Vaibhav
Hi Vaibhavafro,

You're That YouTube channel  Defensive Offence guy nah? Who regularly took & publish interview video of Major(R) Gaurav Arya. --Kulbhushan Jhadav (talk) 17:22, 30 November 2019 (UTC)


 * I will neither say no nor say yes. I will keep you in suspense. &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 18:18, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

ARBIPA sanctions alert
Kautilya3 (talk) 11:14, 2 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Kautilya3, Are you trying to harass me? &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 12:18, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Alerts are not harassment. I am surprised you haven't received this notice till now, having been editing IPA topics for several years. If you don't want to receive such notices, you can put a note saying you are aware of them. See my User talk for example. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 12:29, 2 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Kautilya3: Ok sorry I misunderstood. &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 18:26, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
 * User:Vaibhavafro you should thank him for informing you. you could have inadvertently violated sanctions on a page if you were unaware. all Indian articles are under this and is enforced strictly on many pages. -- D Big X ray ᗙ  11:34, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for pointing out Navy Day (India) early in November to me. I don't know if it was a coincidence or not, but the timing was just correct for Navy Day yesterday, and it is good the article was in a better shape this year. The article was viewed over 130,000 in the past two days. DTM (talk) 06:31, 5 December 2019 (UTC)


 * DTM, OMG thats a lot! I didn't plan anything; I would have helped you doing it if not for my planned Wikibreak. I am still trying to leave Wiki for a few months; I hope I am successful in executing that starting in a few days from now. Best, &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 07:21, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Seems like you've started the WikiBreak as per the section below. Bye till next year. DTM (talk) 09:54, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ajey Nagar


A tag has been placed on Ajey Nagar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Praxidicae (talk) 20:10, 6 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Although I have replied at talk page of Ajey Nagar, I would also like to save my reply here for future reference. As of approximately 6 hours ago, the page has already been marked 'reviewed' by a New Page reviewer.


 * There is unambiguous fulfillment of notability guidelines for this article since the subject of the article has been covered by the Time magazine, Press Trust of India, India Today and various other third-party reliable sources. This was not the case an year ago; most of the significant media coverage of the person occurred in 2019, not before that. This is obviously the reason why the article was deleted so many times earlier.


 * As of now, the following WP:RS are present about the person: Time magazine, Press Trust of India, India Today, Republic World, Times Now, Business Today, Entrepreneur magazine, Femina magazine etc etc. Best regards, &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 05:17, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Making Amit Bhadana Article
Please create a Amit Bhadana Article. Vikas.bikaneri (talk) 01:41, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Please accept this Barnstar

 * Tessaracter: Thanks! This is my first barnstar. &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 16:26, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019
Hi. According to s.1(2) of the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019, the act shall come into force on such date as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint. Also, the Indian government still not yet appointed the commencement day. Therefore the act is not yet in force.--Mike Rohsopht (talk) 15:33, 13 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Ok &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 15:34, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

New message from DBigXray
The recent events have further improved the notability. The nominater has withdrawn the nomination. You might want to review your !vote as well.  D Big X ray ᗙ  10:36, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

CAA protest
per, WP:BRD May I request you to self revert and get consensus for this controversial edit on the talk page ? -- Happy Holidays! ᗙ D Big X ray ᗙ  13:36, 27 December 2019 (UTC)


 * User:DBigXray: What’s the problem? There is clearly no violation of any of the Wikipedia norms in this edit. Instead, it is you who should try and achieve WP:BRD before removing that. &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 13:41, 27 December 2019 (UTC)


 * I will elaborate on the talk. you have to follow WP:BRD first. And it needs a self revert. -- Happy Holidays! ᗙ D Big X ray ᗙ  13:42, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Just to clarify the B and R and D here. An IP boldly added this. I reverted it and it will be discussed on the talk page. your revert is conflicting with the BRD here. -- Happy Holidays! ᗙ D Big X ray ᗙ  13:44, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
 * -- Happy Holidays! ᗙ D Big X ray ᗙ  13:51, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Ok. &mdash;  Vaibhavafro  &#128172; 14:08, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks.  Happy Holidays! ᗙ D Big X ray ᗙ  15:01, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Ds Alert
-- Happy Holidays! ᗙ D Big X ray ᗙ  02:16, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Mahusha
Hi Vaibhavfro I want to contribute with you in your indian defence and nuclear field articles. Please make me a member of your team. Mahusha 18:40 28 Dec 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi Smiley face.svg. Greetings. I have no ‘team’. I just edit the articles I am interested in. A large portion of those articles are related to Indian military. You can do the same. Feel free to contact me for help (although I won’t be here for a few months). Do visit WikiProject:Indian military history. Best wishes! &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 14:00, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
 * As Vaibhav replied. There isn't a team. you do whatever you like. If you need help you can seek help from appropriate task force. indian defence and nuclear field articles come under Military history. You can find them at WikiProject:Indian military history and for more general topic such as History, WP:INDIA is the place. -- Happy Holidays! ᗙ D Big X ray ᗙ  15:02, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Ok vaibhavfro, I am also Indian & I am also passionable to get our Indian readers and people around the world to get to know about our achievements whether it may be nuclear or any other field. Mahusha (talk) 16:02, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Yes DBigXray I will, thank you. Mahusha (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

New message from DESiegel
Stop revert war DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 17:42, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Vaibhavafro!


Happy New Year! Vaibhavafro, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

 Happy New Year! ᗙ D Big X ray ᗙ  11:12, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.


 * Same to you ! &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 14:06, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Mohan Narayan Rao Samant
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:01, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Apology
Hi, I am AGIOS PAISIOS. Because I am a disabled person it is easier to me to copy-paste text sometimes. I will be more careful in the future.-User:AGIOS PAISIOS, 12:47, 15 January 2020


 * No problem. Please take care from next time. You can only copy-paste a small portion (1 to 2 lines max.), not an entire paragraph. You can ask someone else for help when you find it difficult to type it yourself. A belated Happy New year to you. &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 16:22, 15 January 2020 (UTC)


 * And please sign your comments (like I do) by typing "~" four times at the end of your comments. Do visit our Teahouse for friendly help in editing Wikipedia. &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 16:39, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Poor Sources
Please do not used Right wing propaganda sites like Swarajya mag or opinion pieces. -- D Big X ray ᗙ  10:39, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
 * (tps) Has there been any discussion about Swarajaya mag being a "Right wing" and "propaganda site" either on WP:RSN or somewhere else? Can you please give a link to it? I'm asking since I would like to read more about it. —Sarvatra (talk, contribs) 11:58, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
 * , the refs for right wing are in its wiki article. User:Winged Blades of Godric was this part of the discussion on Indian news portals ?  D Big X ray ᗙ  12:02, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

See the talk page of Citizenship Amendment Act protests. This is not the right place. &mdash;  Vaibhavafro  &#128172; 12:38, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
 * the refs for right wing are in its wiki article. Sorry for bothering you again, but I don't get what article you are referring to? Please give a link to it. —Sarvatra (talk, contribs) 12:48, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Swarajya (magazine)-- D Big X ray ᗙ  12:52, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Oh, thanks. I was looking at Right wing article. —Sarvatra (talk, contribs) 12:55, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Citizenship Amendment Act protests. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Dey subrata (talk) 02:11, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

We are working as a efficient group together, but I was not expecting this from you. Be careful next time you add any perspective. Higher level warning will be given if you continue such. Thank you. Dey subrata (talk) 02:11, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * (tps) Can you please elaborate more on how the edit is Vaibhavafro's "own personal analysis"?I mean, the reference Vaibhavafro has added supports it. Is altnews not WP:RS? —Sarvatra (talk, contribs) 04:28, 4 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Thanks for promptly pointing this out. Whatever I added in that edit is 100% fully supported by the source. &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 06:59, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

For future reference: Please refer to this version of the talk page to know the context of this notice, because I will not be available for the next three months. &mdash;  Vaibhavafro  &#128172; 08:58, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Haha, look at this guy. He thinks he can actually take a wikibreak? NOOOB —Sarvatra (talk, contribs) 13:29, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * LOL I just noticed, you actually have a 'newbie' userbox at the top XD —Sarvatra (talk, contribs) 13:30, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Discussion on alleged biased editing
You are requested to shift your and mine comments related to a future WP:TBAN discussion on my talk page from Talk:Citizenship Amendment Act protests.

That is not the right place since the topic is about me, not about the article (per WP:TALK). Please comply. &mdash;  Vaibhavafro  &#128172; 13:04, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

moved below. -- D Big X ray ᗙ  13:33, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Temple destroyed
Not only was the Temple gate damaged, the idol of Hanuman was destroyed. This event was rare and needs to be added. Please self revert this edit. &mdash;  Vaibhavafro  &#128172; 18:54, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
 * , please see the quote from altnews source that you had added "“The Hanuman idol inside the temple was vandalised wherein the idol’s right arm was broken and the face was disfigured. After things settled, the Hanuman idol was covered with a piece of cloth to protect Hindu sentiments,” said Anand. “There was no damage to the structure of the temple but the right side of the door was damaged. ” Clearly I am not impressed and I would need some convincing before I can self revert myself.  D Big X ray ᗙ  18:59, 3 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Well, why would people attack an idol located inside a temple, if they didn't intend to? This was clearly not collateral damage; it was intended. Such things don't happen all the day. This needs to be mentioned. &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 19:03, 3 February 2020 (UTC)


 * are you trying to use the article to paint communal things, the temple a man made structure was between clashes gt damages, does not need a mention here, tomorrow may be a damage happen to a house and the owner may be a hindu, so it will be written a hindu house got damage, stop this irrational concepts here. Attack was on Jamia, shall we call now a Muslim University attacked. Talk rational please, try to avoid POV. Dey subrata (talk) 19:16, 3 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The fact remains that no source has been presented for your claim "destroyed"-- D Big X ray ᗙ  19:22, 3 February 2020 (UTC)


 * What I wrote in the article was "vandalised", not "destroyed". &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 19:30, 3 February 2020 (UTC)


 * What you just said is a classic case of false equivalence. By an extrapolation of your logic, the destruction of Babri Masjid wasn't communally inspired, but was JUST a case of people destroying a structure for fun. Please refrain from such personal attacks and talk sense. &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 19:28, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Again you fail to understand, Babri was not between a clash, it was pre-planned and orchestrated accordingly by one group of people. Here this is different, it by chance was between a clash, ther was no intention involved. Dey subrata (talk) 19:38, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
 * No one moved your comment, my comment was moved so placed at the previous place, just see the times. Dey subrata (talk) 19:55, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
 * You did move it and slightly messed-up the order by rearranging them. Anyway, I have tidied things up using bullet-points, because, I don’t want to be blocked for edit warring on such a small issue. Regards, &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 20:50, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Anyway, I have added this incident in the main “Protests” section. This section is dedicated to covering such incidents. Though some editors might consider this incident to not be notable enough for the “Chronology” section, any well-intentioned editor is not expected to dispute this edit of mine. &mdash;  Vaibhavafro  &#128172; 00:11, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * It was our fault that we were not going through the consequences of the incidents. Just see this 1. Hindutva groups were involved in this event. I thought you will add a neutral narrative, instead you put all facts into gutter and added a hindu temple was vandalised. Unbelievable !!!! DBX, I think we need to be more careful as such biased attempts will be made in comming days too. Dey subrata (talk) 02:05, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Firstly, whatever I added was 100% fully supported by the source. The warning notice you served me on my talk page was promptly rebutted by another editor. Secondly, I was not aware of that aspect of the incident; thanks for adding that. Thirdly, please stop using logical fallacies. Regards, &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 07:05, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * , I hope you have now understood that you were expecting too much from User:Vaibhavafro. Based on my own experience of his editings, you can expect twisted narratives that are pro BJP-RSS from him. For now I am collecting these diffs, I will post an arbitration case for a topic ban when I get sufficient examples.  D Big X ray ᗙ  11:29, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

What aspect of my edits were “twisted narratives that are pro BJP-RSS”? I have welcomed the additional details added by Dey subrata; I have not disputed it even slightly.

What I see, however, is that there is a slight-to-moderate lack of WP:DUE weightage of narratives from right-wing groups in some Wikipedia articles. That’s why I try to fix that (per WP:NPOV). But some editors misconstrue my edits anyway.

Nevertheless, I think that you will never find ANY “evidence” against me to get a WP:TBAN on me. Honestly, I didn’t expect such a statement from you. &mdash;  Vaibhavafro  &#128172; 11:53, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * , The title of this thread itself is a wonderful example of the "twisted narrative" without factual basis. "I try to fix that " is one excuse to defend blatant right wing POV edits, but you should know that we value NPOV. NPOV is one of Wikipedia's three core content policies, and something that is non negotiable. It is quite easy to spot for anyone if you are editing with NPOV or RSS POV. Making edits that deliberately shift the POV towards right wing with an excuse of "trying to balance" is a classic case of WP:TE. You have already been given a DS alert on Indian topics. Regarding finding of "any diffs", FYI, I already have a list of diffs collected on this case from the articles on my watchlists, and it is up to you to provide me more of it by continuing the RSS POV pushing on Indian topics. I am glad that we got a chance to discuss this, so now I hope that my bringing out an Arbitration case will not be a complete surprise. You should expect it.  regards.  D Big X ray ᗙ  12:25, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * and Please do not make this a WP:BATTLEGROUND. Both of you are very good wiki contributors and I personally would hate to lose out anyone of you. Let's assume good faith on each other's part and tone down the accusations a bit.
 * @DBigXray: I would suggest you to reduce the labelling of "RSS-POV" and "right-wing". No one likes to be labelled as something which they may not be actually.
 * @Vaibhavafro: I suggest to you hold out for a while. This article is still a current event and DBX is editing it from the beginning. In fact, he is the biggest contributor to this article. So once it is no longer a current event, you can start making it more NPOV or Balance it properly.


 * Just two bits of mine. Cheers. —Sarvatra (talk, contribs) 13:14, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Sarvatra, Thanks for the note. I think my comment above is elaborate enough to point out the specific problem and how I plan to address it if Vaibhavafro continues this. I know he is an experienced contributor, which is why I felt it appropriate to provide a warning so that he can resolve the concerns going forward. If you or Vaibhav believes that there is no problem in his editing and everything is peachy, then we all can continue doing what we are doing right now and once I have a strong case I will bring it out and let the WP:AE decide on the merits of the case, Vaibhav can defend himself on AE, when that happens. regards. D Big X ray ᗙ  13:40, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

I am a NOOB with regards to Wikipedia policies; I only know the bare minimum I need to know for editing. Today was the first time I visited WP:AE.

The only articles related to Indian politics to which I have significantly contributed are 2019 Supreme Court verdict on Ayodhya dispute, Revocation of the special status of Jammu and Kashmir and Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019. I can’t recall any other significant contributions of mine. The main reason why I am on Wikipedia is to improve the quality of Indian-military related articles and those related to India’s space programs. The rest of the topics I am interested in are already well-covered by other editors.

I am pointing the aforementioned things out to highlight my interests, and, highlight that I am not on Wikipedia for editing controversial political articles.

Nevertheless, I would be grateful to if he can suggest ways in which I can improve the neutrality of my contributions to controversial political articles. &mdash;  Vaibhavafro  &#128172; 14:41, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * If that is the case then you better continue editing military articles, as there is less scope to introduce political POVs in articles on weapons and armaments. If you have strong opinions on a political topic, it is better to not edit that article, or restrict your editings on that topic to non controversial improvements such as ref improvements/ copy edits/ etc. WP:NPOV, WP:TE and the related essays, pretty much cover everything, so it may be a good idea to read them again even if you have read it in past.  D Big X ray ᗙ  15:47, 4 February 2020 (UTC)


 * I want to frankly tell you a few things about myself (I am not being egocentric): WP:TE clearly states- I clearly have a personal bias (obvious). And I am civilised enough to be able to restrain myself from showing that bias while editing Wikipedia (I have a decent presence on forums, which I use to share my thoughts unrestrictedly).


 * Do I still need to be 'extra-careful' while editing controversial articles, just because I have shown a bit of my bias on talk pages? &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 17:31, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Dummy section for testing archive setup
This is a dummy section meant for testing the bot archive setup on my talk page. &mdash;  Vaibhavafro  &#128172; 11:15, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Suggestion
Hi, I saw that you created an article for the new Air Defence Command, a tri-service command. There are also other tri-service commands as you know and have helped with. But the category for some of them is Category:Joint military units and formations in Asia. Is this still a suitable name? Does this need to be discussed somewhere else (Indian milhist talkpage) or is a non-controversial suggestion and could be implemented without much of a fuss? DTM (talk) 12:51, 17 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Yes, I agree with you. We need to create a new category called “Category:Joint military units and formations of India” for Indian articles and put this new category under Category:Joint military units and formations in Asia. I think this will be a non-controversial thing to do, so no need to worry. &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 01:55, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Would "joint" and "tri-service" mean the same thing? "Joint" covers all "tri-service"... but does "tri-serivce" cover all "joint"? DTM (talk) 14:12, 19 February 2020 (UTC)


 * No. “Joint” and “tri-service” aren’t necessarily the same. For example, the US military has 5 branches (excluding Coast Guard). But in India, we only have three military branches. So “Joint” and “tri-service” are the same for India. &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 03:14, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Also note that in the US, a true “joint command” is called a Unified combatant command. As a result, Wikipedia has a category called “Category:Unified combatant commands of the United States Armed Forces”. But, even this category is contained within Category:Joint military units and formations of the United States. Congruently, we also have to create a new category called “Category:Joint military units and formations of India” for Indian joint formations. Also note that agencies such as Armed Forces Special Operations Division are not full-fledged commands; they are only ‘joint formations’. &mdash;  Vaibhavafro  &#128172; 03:25, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Cool down
may I request you to drop this confrontational and hostile tone in which you are writing your edit summaries and talk page comments on the riot article. Please check wP:CIVIL once again. and repeat Om Shanti Shanti. -- ⋙–D Big X ray ᗙ  07:17, 27 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the note. Debate is not confrontation. &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 07:34, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
 * , I am talking about the tone. I know from past experience that you can put on a much better tone.  ⋙–D Big X ray ᗙ  07:44, 27 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Ok. I’ll soften my tone further if you insist. I have a concern that some amount of WP:STONEWALLING is going on there. &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 07:48, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
 * , It is a controversial article. A hostile tone will not help in any way. People have difference in opinion. Thanks for considering my request.  ⋙–D Big X ray ᗙ  08:23, 27 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Could you also please request our friend to cool down? Going by their replies, they seem to think about me as a creature of low intellectual capacity who is incapable of understanding the intricacies of editing Wikipedia. In one of their recent replies to me, they said that I am giving them . As per WP:CIVIL, they could have just said that they aren’t going to reply to me. &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 08:32, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
 * , I am sure your assumption on Dey's thoughts are not correct. His comment was less on you and more on everyone who was starting new threads on same topic. I hope you have been here for long to understand that existing talk page threads should be utilized instead of starting new ones on same topic.
 * , Please note, every suggestion I gave to vaibhav (in my comments above) also applies to you. Please try to keep a formal and civil tone in your replies. Lets keep the discussion friendly and focussed on the topic of the thread. regards  ⋙–D Big X ray ᗙ  08:37, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
 * , Please note, every suggestion I gave to vaibhav (in my comments above) also applies to you. Please try to keep a formal and civil tone in your replies. Lets keep the discussion friendly and focussed on the topic of the thread. regards  ⋙–D Big X ray ᗙ  08:37, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the note. I am off to a Wikibreak (hopefully). Hasta la vista until next time. &mdash;  Vaibhavafro  &#128172; 09:59, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

March Madness 2020
G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team

A message
If someone do not participate in a discussion that does not always mean oppostion to your proposal, non participation may be due to many other reasons. I tried to put arguments supporting two points made by you i.e. the Islamic extremism and temple vandalism at the CAA protest talk page, realised no point of arguing with users who fails to see reason, refuses to accept when can't counter you.2405:204:3323:9B54:74E0:D3F4:A8D0:A375 (talk) 08:13, 28 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Thanks for pointing this out. I know; I just gave up since no one was coming forward to leave a comment in my support. Also, since I am a relatively new user, I was being threatened with sanctions. That’s why I left arguing.


 * That article has apparently been hijacked by biased editors who think that their bias is neutral. So, whenever they see left-wing extremism, they go into a state of cognitive dissonance. &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 03:34, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
 * I consider the riot page is also baised.
 * You know something, they just protected the riot talk page also, although there were angry comments, yet I felt protecting the talk was not needed. 47.31.163.49 (talk) 17:59, 29 February 2020 (UTC)


 * I fully agree with you. You can still ask for help at WP:TH, if you need any. &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 18:12, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Answer
On second thought, I will answer here, but please don't mention that username any further. In answer, there was WP:OUTING, so they chose to WP:VANISH. El_C 18:32, 11 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Oh... I hope they return someday. Thanks for telling. &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 18:42, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Help creating article
Hello,

I want your help in creating an article of Indian YouTuber. Because i don't know much english and reffrences. I need your help. I want you to contribute to that article.

I request you.

I hope for you.

Don't disappoint me by saying no.

I am waiting for your reply. Mr. Bikaneri (talk) 10:57, 5 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Sorry bhai; I am really busy till August. So, I will not edit Wikipedia till then. Please ask for help at the teahouse. &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 12:35, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

bhai, I have created Draft:Amit Bhadana (yutuber), please see. Is this correct and was it submitted? Mr. Bikaneri (talk) 09:00, 6 May 2020 (UTC)


 * I left a comment in your favour. &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 05:33, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Don't accuse editors of WP:BITE without doing due diligence Comment
At Draft talk:Amit Bhadana (yutuber) you accused of biting a newcomer. Please note that WP:BITE wouldn't apply to a WP:SPA account that is very likely a UPE and is attempting to WP:GAME the system. The article has been recreated and speedy deleted so many times (20+ times) that the draft and mainspace spots for it are salted. The intentional misspelling of the disambiguation is a pretty big red flag. You can also see on the user's talk page that they've created three different instance of this draft alone in a span of less than 24 hours. Just some easy things to look out for before you go and accuse an editor as experienced as Praxi of WP:BITE. Cheers Sulfurboy (talk) 06:47, 7 May 2020 (UTC)


 * I didn’t mean it as a serious accusation. appears to be bitten, as was also noted  by . I felt compelled to leave a comment there in their support because they pleaded for help on my talk (in the thread above). I am sorry if I caused any offence. Regards, &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 19:10, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Help
Bhai, Amit Bhadana ban chuka he. Magar notability issue aa agya he. Aap usse fix karwane me madad kare. Thanks Hindu Viki (talk) 02:17, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:07, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Special Group (India), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jammu and Kashmir.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced
G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Hello, I'm Tayi Arajakate. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to The Hindu seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate Talk 11:38, 4 October 2020 (UTC)


 * I created a new section for controversies in which I listed all the controversial allegations against The Hindu. How is this an NPOV violation? Please enlighten me. &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 15:46, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , cherrypicking quotes from the references, while completely omitting their primary context is a pretty blatant NPOV violation. You've been here long enough to understand this. Tayi Arajakate  Talk 15:53, 4 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Please see the talk page of the article in question. As I mentioned earlier, I simply listed all the controversial allegations against the newspaper. Such a list is bound to seem negative. Furthermore, I did mention the context of the allegations i.e; the family dispute, didn’t I? Any improvements are surely welcome. &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 15:58, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page The Hindu has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. This is in reference to Special:Diff/981820603 also see. Tayi Arajakate Talk 17:29, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * My edit summary in Special:Diff/981820603 accurately describes what I did; I restored the content you deleted in Special:diff/981780581 without providing a tenable explanation. In fact, IMO, this warning should have been served to you for what you did in Special:diff/981780581. &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 17:47, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * This primarily concerns your inflammatory accusations of WP:STONEWALL in the edit summary. Accusations like these can easily be considered a form of personal attack and is certainly not suitable for a constructive discussion especially when made right after starting a discussion. Your rejection of my objection itself is also not a lack of "tenable explanation," that too an objection with which you engaged with at the talk page. Tayi Arajakate  Talk 22:41, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject Newcomer and Historian of the Year awards now open
G'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:46, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Voting for "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" closing
G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:35, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive
Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive and create a worklist at WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:26, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nomination period closing soon
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election voting has commenced
Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:40, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Marcos logo
I didn't know that it was official logo, so that I removed it. After you mentioned "official logo", I checked its source and found it's official. It was my mistake that I didn't checked it's authenticity before removing it in first place. Sorry. —15:06, 17 September 2021 (UTC)FoxtAl (talk)


 * It's okay, no problem. &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhav afro &#x202F;&#128172; 13:58, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting period closing soon
Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Any more previous copyright violations remaining?
I see you were warned in July 2019 about copyright, but I have found one more instance from that time period where you copied content as it is. I request you to please go through your contributions and remove any such edit that still remain. Hemantha (talk) 14:23, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Marine Commandos (MARCOS) logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Marine Commandos (MARCOS) logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations opening soon
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:52, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting opening soon!
Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Correction to previous election announcement
Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:42, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting closing soon
Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)