User talk:Valder137

AfD nomination of Eagle Task Force
An editor has nominated Eagle Task Force, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:16, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of REB-36D Peacemaker II NAWCC


The article REB-36D Peacemaker II NAWCC has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * unreferenced non-notable fictional aircraft, really only needs a mention in the related novel article

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MilborneOne (talk) 09:59, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

October 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Jenn Sterger. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--Arxiloxos (talk) 03:42, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Jenn Sterger
Please stop deleting the Brett Favre situation from this page. If you have an issue with it, take it to the article's talk page. --Muboshgu (talk) 14:05, 13 October 2010 (UTC) I deleted because it is not verifyable fact and is just, at this point, muckraking. due to YOUR guidlines "This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous."

The material added about the allegations involving Favre is not "unsourced or poorly sourced", and it is not libel - is it libel to claim that there are allegations that he left voice mails and texted her, included texts with photos? Someone tell the NFL, because they are investigating the allegations. 165.189.169.138 (talk) 18:34, 13 October 2010 (UTC)