User talk:Valeria magnolfi

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. I've moved your draft here. I don't think it's ready yet.
 * you do not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the organisation claims or interviewing its management. Most of your text is unsourced or referenced to the project or its funders.
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: Its reduced dimensions makes this solution suitable for on-site treatment and direct use of biogas. It thus can avoid storage, transport as well as landfilling or incineration fees while requiring very low operational costs
 * the article was created in a single edit without wikilinks or references, and looks as if was copied from an unknown and possibly copyrighted source.
 * the article was a copyright violation. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. That is not the case here. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient. I will deleted the article when I've finished this because of the copyright violation

It looks as if you have a conflict of interest when editing this article, and you must declare it. That is particularity the case if you are an employee of an involved company or otherwise remunerated in relation to this project. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.

Thanks, Jimfbleak - talk to me?  14:36, 21 September 2015 (UTC)