User talk:Valid234

March 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Michael Carrick. For previous edits, and warnings, see obviously related Special:Contributions/109.144.215.102. - Tom &#124; Thomas.W talk 23:10, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Michael Carrick, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:15, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:22, 14 March 2018 (UTC)