User talk:Valleyspeakinc

Regarding the article ValleySpeak Project Server (software)
A tag has been placed on ValleySpeak Project Server (software), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. pIrish 19:40, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:ValleySpeak message dashboard.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:ValleySpeak message dashboard.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 21:11, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Discussion from your deleted article's talk page
I will go one by one through these:
 * 24SevenOffice - has won several notable awards and has four outside references to back up claims
 * AceProject - while the article should probably be deleted, it has gone through a deletion process
 * AtTask - has references from various notable sites to back up claims
 * Basecamp (software) - gets more than a million Google hits
 * Central Desktop - was involved in a skirmish with Google, also has links to notable references about it
 * Controlling of Projects - I have nominated it for speedy deletion
 * JIRA (software) - not too sure what to do about this one, it could very well indeed be notable (just shy of one million Google hits), but there aren't any references on the actual article
 * Microsoft Office Project Server - it's made by Microsoft, that, in itself, makes it worthy of an article
 * project.net - I have nominated it for speedy deletion
 * Teamwork (software) - gets more than 1.5 million Google hits --pIrish 23:15, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

I will also mention that creating an article advertising/self-promoting your own product is against Wikipedia policy as stated here. You are clearly violating this policy, which is probably also pushing it to be deleted more quickly. Also, here is a good page to figure out what is considered notable with regards to organizations/companies. --pIrish 23:28, 24 April 2007 (UTC)