User talk:Valssyr

August 2022
Hi, I just wanted to thank you for your contributions to the page Knight. A small note; as the lede of the article is already quite long, and you've added information that may be useful but also lengthens the lede without adding contextual information (the sentence is giving examples of orders and is not meant to approach a comprehensive list), I've removed the extra list items. I do hope that you stick around. Iseult  Δx parlez moi 16:40, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
Hello, I'm BrownHairedGirl. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, British Empire, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Wikipedia is NOT a reliable source   Brown HairedGirl  (talk) • (contribs) 12:21, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi Valssyr! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of British Empire several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Jr8825 •  Talk  04:19, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at British Empire shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bbb23 (talk) 15:15, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

There is no edit war, more like random people editing my contributions out for reasons I am not being given. It really feels like I have startled some British nationalists by simply pointing out and contextualizing the origin of a sentence, which I consider necessary due to the amount of people who are ignorant of that.

I think of Wikipedia as a place for discussion and knowledge, it is sad to see I am being threatened by simply writing truths. Valssyr (talk) 18:45, 24 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi Valssyr. Regardless of whether you think you're right, it's never OK to keep changing content after you've seen others disagree. Wikipedia simply won't work if people keep undoing each other. Please see the policies about edit warring that have been linked above. Also, please remember to comment on the content, rather than guessing what the motives of other editors might be. The next step is to use the article talk page to explain why you think the change is good, and discuss the sources you've provided for it, see WP:ONUS. It's worth noting that two editors have now warned you about edit warring and neither of us have removed the addition you're proposing. Our concern isn't the content change (I'm sympathetic to adding a note), it's your reversions. Jr8825  •  Talk  19:19, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Vandalism and misleading edit summaries
Your vandalism at the Latinx article has been removed. Please do not use misleading edit summaries like, "corrected a spelling error" when what you did was change the word neologism to racial slur in the lead sentence of the article. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 22:48, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Hello, I'm LilianaUwU. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to England—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Liliana UwU (talk / contribs) 02:00, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 03:25, 16 October 2022 (UTC)