User talk:Valter666

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome!  Transity  ( talk &bull; contribs ) 21:17, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Necromanther
A tag has been placed on Necromanther requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  Transity  ( talk &bull; contribs ) 21:17, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

July 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Necromanther has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bmyspace\.com (links: http://www.myspace.com/necromanther). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:20, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 00:56, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Archive of Necromanther talk page
Hey, I would like to know why do you want to delete my article about Necromanther, it's an article about a music solo project, I have the information needed to show the importance and story of the project, i don't understand why are you always deleting the article. If i'm doing something wrong please tell me, but i think it's all here.


 * Personally, I don't think I've deleted this article in the past, but I can tell you what is triggering the deletions, I think. In order to create an article on Wikipedia, you need to ensure that the subject is notable by Wikipedia standards. In this case, check the general notability guidelines as well as the guidelines for musicians. If the subject meets one or more of the criteria on these lists, and you can show reliable sources that substantiate these claims, then the article is likely appropriate. If not, then it is likely to be deleted. If you have questions, let me know. -- Transity  ( talk &bull; contribs ) 21:43, 27 July 2009 (UTC)


 * I think I have the necessary information, i still don't think the page needs to be deleted... I once created an article about a band called Devian with my old account with less information then this one and it was never deleted. I don't know what to do for you guys don't delete this artice.


 * You need to do what I outlined above. Just because another article was kept with less information it doesn't follow that this one should follow suit. As of right now, you have 0 reliable sources, and no indication of why or how this article meets the notability standards. -- Transity  ( talk &bull; contribs ) 22:56, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * In point of fact, the Devian article you mentioned is tagged for notability and lack of references, the very same things that are creating problems with this article. Anyone could come along and request deletion for that article as well. So my advice for this article can and should be applied to that one as well. -- Transity  ( talk &bull; contribs ) 22:58, 27 July 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, but... If I have some sources with biography texts, discography, etc. from other websites, can I use them to solve the problem? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Valter666 (talk • contribs) 23:56, 27 July 2009 (UTC)


 * You need sources that count as reliable sources. Read the page at that link, and determine if any of the sources you have meet the criteria for reliable sources. If so, then you should be able to use them to show notability (assuming that they, themselves, help the subject meet the criteria for notability). In brief (these are generalisms, here), blogs don't cut it, self-published sources don't cut it (no editor to appease, just publish your own words), myspace and other social networking sites aren't useful. If there is a review of this person/group in a large newspaper or magazine, that would be substantial. Again, check WP:RS for the guidelines on reliable sources - that's my best advice. -- Transity  ( talk &bull; contribs ) 00:27, 28 July 2009 (UTC)


 * I have found a website with a biography of the project and a small review of the debut album, the text is in portuguese because it is in a portuguese website, the project is also portuguese. I have not created the text in this website so I think it could be used. Can I give you the link of the website? I don't know what to do now with this source. Here it is: http://www.metalunderground.org/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=26625 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Valter666 (talk • contribs) 00:55, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

(undent)I dropped this here as the page has been deleted, and I didn't want to lose the conversation we'd had. I looked at the website, but as it's in Portuguese (and I don't know Portuguese) I won't be of much help I'm afraid. If it's a blog or something similar, then it is likely not good enough. If it's something that you believe meets the criteria of a reliable source, then you've got something to go on. Note, though, that one mention in one reliable source (especially if it's a borderline reliable source) doesn't mean notability.

My advice is to research the subject, see if you can make a case for one or more of the criteria for notability, and work up the page in a sandbox first (like User:Valter666/sandbox). If you want, you can ask for a copy of the page as it last existed to be dropped into your user space. -- Transity  ( talk &bull; contribs ) 13:49, 28 July 2009 (UTC)