User talk:Valyard

Welcome!

Hello, Valyard, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! - 2/0 (cont.) 22:02, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

May 2010
Hi Valyard, RE Spirit possession - we may know it isnt scientifically unproven but who else? I was trying to prevent a tennis match between over-skeptics and... anyone else. The previous edit was ridiculous. Perhaps I should have just deleted it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MagicalThinking (talk • contribs) 07:32, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Please do not alter direct quotes, as you did here. - 2/0 (cont.) 22:02, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 * My apologies, it was accidental Valyard (talk) 23:33, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 * All good, thanks for your note. - 2/0 (cont.) 03:45, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

ANI
Coul you remove the thread until tomorrow, or move it to WP:FTN, as I have to go offline now (to bed). I'd be very grateful. Verbal chat  21:19, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * As I said, thanks. I do reccomend FTN before ANI. They're a mixed bunch (views wise), and likely to find sources if it is possible, which would address everything. Verbal chat  21:28, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Post To FTN
I propose posting the below text to WP:FTN, signed by both of us, if you agree. I've tried to keep it short and descriptive. Verbal chat  15:20, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

== Old Souls and Life Before Life ==

There is disagreement as to whether these articles need a notability tag. One user maintains that consensus has been established by two AfDs (AfD Old Souls and AfD Life before Life) but that the articles may require more sources. The other user has stated that the community consensus of WP:NOTE overrides the consensus of the poorly attended AfDs.

Could interested and disinterested editors give their opinions, suggest alternatives, or produce WP:RS that might settle the question?