User talk:VanHalen1978

March 2021
Hello, I'm Kammill. An edit that you recently made to Richard Dawson seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   – Kammill  ⟨talk⟩ 04:20, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Fleetwood Mac (1975 album), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. DuncanHill (talk) 00:13, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Young Americans shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Binksternet (talk) 00:15, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Let's Dance (David Bowie album), you may be blocked from editing. Your repeated changes to date order, contrary to express instructions about WP:ENGVAR, repeated comments in edit summaries, and the edit instructions in the articles, make me believe you are not here to contribute constructively to the encyclopaedia. DuncanHill (talk) 00:17, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. All your edits to date are contrary to both edit notices and consensus, and you have made no effort either to explain or discuss your edits. DuncanHill (talk) 00:21, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

In the next 36 hours, please familiarize yourself with MOS:DATEFORMAT and WP:ENGVAR
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 00:29, 9 March 2021 (UTC)