User talk:Vanamonde93/Archive 43

Rowling
I wonder whether Guin's comments on Harry Potter Universe—good fare for its age group, but stylistically ordinary, imaginatively derivative, and ethically rather mean-spirited—belong at J. K. Rowling since scholars agree that Harry Potter is heavily influenced by the children's fantasy of writers such as Ursula K. Le Guin. TrangaBellam (talk) 08:55, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Oh, I love that comment! Especially the "mean-spirited" part. I really like it. But it seems doubtful that it belongs in the J. K. Rowling article. It seems a bit coatrack-y, as it's only a more or less throwaway comment in an interview, in response to a specific question, not an in-depth analysis by Le Guin, or even a spontaneous comment by her. Moreover, TrangaBellam, your quote from the article (in green) is incomplete, inasmuch as Le Guin isn't singled out; she's merely mentioned as one of a whole list of influences: Scholars agree that Harry Potter is heavily influenced by the children's fantasy of writers such as C. S. Lewis, J. R. R. Tolkien, Elizabeth Goudge, Ursula K. Le Guin, Dianna Wynne Jones, and E. Nesbit. Admittedly Le Guin is the only one on the list that's still living, so the others can't be asked what they think of Harry Potter, but nevertheless. Bishonen &#124; tålk 11:59, 21 February 2022 (UTC).
 * Regretfully, Bish, Le Guin isn't among the living either, she died in 2018...TB, I'm not sure, and I agree with all else that Bish writes. As with any of her interviews, there's gems strewn throughout, but it's still an interview, and there's reams of scholarly material. I think it's this very interview that's the source for her "stylistically ordinary" comment currently sourced to a book, but if that's the piece of the quote the source chose to reuse, that's what it is...I wonder if other academics reproduce it in full; they might have done, if it illustrated the point they were looking to make. Certainly there's a lot of source material that makes similar arguments. Vanamonde (Talk) 15:16, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Messages being posted on your behalf
This confused me for a little while but this discretionary sanctions message was posted on my talk page while signed on your behalf by another editor. I'm not sure if it was intentional or accidental, but it is certainly misleading and confusing, and, I imagine, not really appropriate. I thought you should know. Iskandar323 (talk) 09:26, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Sorry, my bad. I was copy-pasting that notice from the GS:IRANPOL page, and forgot to remove Vanamonde's signature and add mine. Forgive me, just a careless mistake. I will correct it now. Ypatch (talk) 12:31, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know, seems to have been taken care of. Vanamonde (Talk) 16:53, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Vanamonde, I got a purely administrative and rather trivial question: since the arbitration should users be notified of discretionary sanctions instead? I'm asking because WP:ARBIRPDS says that "general sanctions" were superseded by "standard discretionary sanctions". Thanks, VR talk 03:54, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Essentially, nothing changes from an awareness perspective; see 1.iii. Any notices that expired, and that have not been rendered redundant by participation in enforcement proceedings, will need to be renewed; alerts that expire will need to be renewed; new users or previously unaware users will need to be notified; but a user with a notification within the twelve months before the ARBCOM ruling was considered aware of DS at that point. Vanamonde (Talk) 04:49, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the clarification.VR talk 06:26, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Baseless Slander
I demand you to cease your baseless slander against me. The edit ban was clearly in violation of my freedom of speech and rights on this platform. I'm willing to work with the community here but this disgusting vile atmosphere of slander and threatening will not deter me. The edits made on vikram sampath's page were outrageous crap. Krao212 (talk) 19:35, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
 * You were sanctioned because your edits were disruptive, and they continue to be disruptive. Regardless of what you think of Vikram Sampath's page, you cannot simply ignore your TBAN (as you have done here once again). As such I'm not going to discuss that page with you. Freedom of speech is not a relevant concept here. Vanamonde (Talk) 19:48, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

You sound a authoritarian neo-nazi. I know I shouldn't engage in such slanderous attacks but you are deliberately silencing me and that is wrong. I'm willing to work with you to positively contribute to editing but I have the right to express my opinion. I have seen all sorts of slanderous attacks on people who edit pages related to south asia, with phrases like "hindu right wing", "sanghi" and "Hindu supremacist" used. It's clear that there is a double standard here. If you really cared about the truth and doing what is morally right, you would try to help me rather than slander and silence me. I have no hatred towards any entity but I will not deny that I certainly have a tilt to pro-india and pro-hindu views. I'm allowed to have these views if I used sources to back up my claims. Krao212 (talk) 20:07, 25 February 2022 (UTC)


 * If you call people neo-nazis, please don't be surprised when you are reverted, ignored, and blocked. Vanamonde (Talk) 20:13, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅ --Floquenbeam (talk) 20:50, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks Floq, much appreciated. Vanamonde (Talk) 21:02, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

T-ban appeal
Hi Vanamonde, just wanted to let you know that I'll be appealing the topic ban at AE. Thanks. Ypatch (talk) 05:11, 27 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks for letting me know. Vanamonde (Talk) 05:36, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 February 2022
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:22, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine&#32; on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 00:30, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2022).

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Modussiccandi
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg BOZ • Brookie (deceased) • Jackmcbarn • Jamesday • Jonathunder • Master of Puppets • Saravask



CheckUser changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Callanecc

Oversighter changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Callanecc

Guideline and policy news
 * A RfC is open to change the wording of revision deletion criterion 1 to remove the sentence relating to non-infringing contributions.
 * A RfC is open to discuss prohibiting draftification of articles over 90 days old.

Technical news
 * The deployment of the reply tool as an opt-out feature, as announced in last month's newsletter, has been delayed to 7 March. Feedback and comments are being welcomed at Wikipedia talk:Talk pages project.
 * Special:Nuke will now allow the selection of standard deletion reasons to be used when mass-deleting pages. This was a Community Wishlist Survey request from 2022.
 * The ability to undelete the talk page when undeleting a page using Special:Undelete or the API will be added soon. This change was requested in the 2021 Community Wishlist Survey.

Arbitration
 * Several unused discretionary sanctions and article probation remedies have been rescinded. This follows the community feedback from the 2021 Discretionary Sanctions review.

Miscellaneous
 * The 2022 appointees for the Ombuds commission are Érico, Faendalimas, Galahad, Infinite0694, Mykola7, Olugold, Udehb and Zabe as regular members and Ameisenigel and JJMC89 as advisory members.
 * Following the 2022 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: AntiCompositeNumber, BRPever, Hasley, TheresNoTime, and Vermont.
 * The 2022 Community Wishlist Survey results have been published alongside the ranking of prioritized proposals.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:47, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Twitter attack
and. But you'll see my emails to Functionaries. These are mainly about past discussions and edits, the latest just over a week ago. Including. Doug Weller talk 16:27, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads up! Talk page watchers, eyes on the linked article would be appreciated, I would expect disruption from the twitterati. Vanamonde (Talk) 17:14, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 March newsletter
And so ends the first round of the WikiCup. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were:


 * Epicgenius, a finalist last year, who led the field with 1906 points, gained from 32 GAs and 19 DYKs, all on the topic of New York buildings.
 * 🇨🇽 AryKun, new to the contest, was second with 1588 points, having achieved 2 FAs, 11 GAs and various other submissions, mostly on the subject of birds.
 * Bloom6132, a WikiCup veteran, was in third place with 682 points, garnered from 51 In the news items and several DYKs.
 * GhostRiver was close behind with 679 points, gained from achieving 12 GAs, mostly on ice hockey players, and 35 GARs.
 * 🇺🇳 Kavyansh.Singh was in fifth place with 551 points, with an FA, a FL, and many reviews.
 * Flag of Provo, Utah (1989–2015).svg SounderBruce was next with 454 points, gained from an FA and various other submissions, mostly on United States highways.
 * 🇺🇳 Ktin, another WikiCup veteran, was in seventh place with 412 points, mostly gained from In the news items.

These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:07, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 March newsletter
And so ends the first round of the WikiCup. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were:


 * Epicgenius, a finalist last year, who led the field with 1906 points, gained from 32 GAs and 19 DYKs, all on the topic of New York buildings.
 * 🇨🇽 AryKun, new to the contest, was second with 1588 points, having achieved 2 FAs, 11 GAs and various other submissions, mostly on the subject of birds.
 * Bloom6132, a WikiCup veteran, was in third place with 682 points, garnered from 51 In the news items and several DYKs.
 * GhostRiver was close behind with 679 points, gained from achieving 12 GAs, mostly on ice hockey players, and 35 GARs.
 * 🇺🇳 Kavyansh.Singh was in fifth place with 551 points, with an FA, a FL, and many reviews.
 * Flag of Provo, Utah (1989–2015).svg SounderBruce was next with 454 points, gained from an FA and various other submissions, mostly on United States highways.
 * 🇺🇳 Ktin, another WikiCup veteran, was in seventh place with 412 points, mostly gained from In the news items.

These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Frustration with edit conflicts
Hello, I noticed at Articles for deletion/Mike Tinney you mentioned that your closing was " frustratingly erased by an edit-conflict". I have had that frustration and found a couple of solutions. 1)- copy the content before posting. If there is some issue the content can simply be pasted in a new edit, 2)- scroll to the bottom of the content (your edit) and copy it from there. Happy editing, --  Otr500 (talk) 13:12, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for stopping by. I'm aware of that option; the trouble was, it doesn't work with XfD closer. See this discussion above. Vanamonde (Talk) 15:42, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Well don't that suck? --  Otr500 (talk) 20:54, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

New message from TrangaBellam
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Sanjeev Sanyal § COI edit requests. TrangaBellam (talk) 07:49, 13 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Also, I will appreciate a round of copyedits. TrangaBellam (talk) 08:14, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Saw that, again, not sure if I have the stamina for a lengthy discussion, so no promises. I'll try to look in later. Vanamonde (Talk) 15:54, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Request for opinion/intervention in the article on Bengali Kayastha
Hi Vanamonde, hope you are doing fine. Sorry to bother you again, but this time we badly need your opinion/intervention in order to protect the article from two POV pushers refusing to accept consensus! This is regarding a particular source by Prof. Razia Akter Banu used in the article on Bengali Kayastha. The source has earlier been accepted by Sitush in a closely related article, you may check the difference (4 consecutive edits by Sitush after mine, here) long time back (this article didn't exist at that time and Kulin Kayastha article represented the Bengali Kayastha); the content has been there in the original article after being accepted by Sitush, and later, part of it was incorporated in this closely related article. Trangabellam had recently raised an objection, which has been sorted out as well. You may have a look at their recent statements towards consensus here where they clearly mention that out of two consecutive statements, the second one belongs to our article. Right after my latest edits, I dropped a message on talk page pinging both the trusted editors (on caste & ethnic groups) TrangaBellam & LukeEmily and the latter agreed to wait for TB, please check here. In fact, LukeEmily had in principle agreed as evident from the above conversation. In spite of all these, two comparatively new editors (Bengali editors whom I have fought with in order to prevent POV pushing, one on Baidya, the other editor on Mahishya) are constantly engaging in edit warring/disruptive edits! Since they are not only comparatively new, but Bengali editors, & may apparently have bias/COI, I have requested them to stop disruptive edits/edit warring and let neutral experienced editors like TrangaBellam & LukeEmily drive the consensus (in spite of having a prior consensus with Sitush); please see here, I even mentioned that, as a Bengali, I am taking a backseat and facilitating 2 other experienced editors (TB & LukeEmily) arrive at a consensus. But the problem is, TB or LukeEmily are no longer actively involved in the discussions after the last apparent consensus (recent though, diff provided above). Please have a look at the recent edit warring/disruptive edits along with misleading edit summaries in spite of me having consensus. These two comparatively new Bengali editors, Satnam2408 & Chanchaldm tried their best to convince TrangaBellam & LukeEmily (as evident from their repeated talk page messages), and when they failed, they are engaging in edit warring, clearly defying the existing consensus. I would request you to have a look at the content, it's sheer piece of history, nothing contentious at all, that too attributed to the author. Prof. Banu (as a source) and the cited part has earlier been accepted by Sitush, as mentioned earlier. Would also request you to kindly drop your opinion regarding the content. Thanks & Regards. Ekdalian (talk) 08:02, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
 * must you really open with a single paragraph that occupies my entire screen? I haven't the stamina at the moment, I'll see if I can take a look a little later. Vanamonde (Talk) 15:53, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Sorry, Vanamonde for such a lengthy one! Thanks, anyway. You may also have a look at LukeEmily's latest comments here regarding the edits by Sitush, in case you have some spare time. Regards. Ekdalian (talk) 18:14, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I believe, this issue is on the verge of getting resolved; thanks Vanamonde. Will reach out to you / bother you only if it is really required. Regards. Ekdalian (talk) 10:47, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Make Way for Ducklings FAR
I have nominated Make Way for Ducklings for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. VM, hoping you might have a look and enter opinions. Regards, Sandy Georgia (Talk)  15:56, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Kashmir Files request
Hi Vanamonde93, please could you consider the consensus in the section https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:The_Kashmir_Files#Drama_Film_to_Historical_Drama and provide your feedback in the section? Webberbrad007 (talk) 11:59, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

The NOR policy
Please see the footnote 7 added here. I don't know the history of this footnote, but I had never seen it before. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 02:14, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Well, anything added by Wifione is somewhat suspect, but I don't really see a problem with it; it advises against using reviews as sources for the material covered in the book, but that obviously refers to that material when discussed independent of the book itself. When covering the book, the review is a fine source. Vanamonde (Talk) 04:28, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Precisely, and I am at a loss to understand how a reasonable man can construe otherwise. As I wrote at the t/p, [w]e are not using the film-reviews for drafting our article on the Exodus. TrangaBellam (talk) 15:16, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

March songs
Thank you for support in the RfC! Listening to the charity concert mentioned here. I created the articles of the composer and the soprano. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:49, 10 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks Gerda, hope you're well. Vanamonde (Talk) 16:28, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Now, you can also listen on YouTube, and more music, the piece by Anna Korsun begins after about one hour, and the voices call "Freiheit!" (freedom, instead of "Freude", joy). Music every day, pictured in songs. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:38, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
 * The Prayer is on the Main page, finally + new flowers --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:00, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Getting data from deleted article 'List of games with ray tracing support' so it can be used to help build page on pcgamingwiki
Im not disagreeing with deletion, I just want to see the old article so I can use it to help build a similar page on pcgamingwiki, https://www.pcgamingwiki.com/wiki/List_of_games_that_support_ray_tracing, Im fairly new to wikipedia so I do not know the ins and outs, is this possible ? Or would I have to request a deletion review ? Psychosikh (talk) 02:27, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
 * That's an unusual request, but I don't have a problem with it, so here you go. Please remember that you should not recreate this on Wikipedia; once you have copied the data you want, tag the page for WP:CSD, and an admin will delete it again. Vanamonde (Talk) 00:35, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

New editor revealing too much personal information?
I noticed you redacted personal information a few weeks back from the home page of a new user that I had just welcomed. There is another case that I suspect needs your TLC, I suspect? See user:Ztkirby. Regards --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 18:22, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for flagging this, but it doesn't worry me very much. We typically redact material that's suppressible; see WP:OS for the suppression criteria. A PhD candidate, as this person describes themselves as, is going to be an adult, and as such their name and employment isn't usually suppressible. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:47, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Ok, that makes sense. The previous case I mentioned was a young editor, and that probably explains why I had never come across this type of intervention before. Closed. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 19:37, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Discussion at WP:THQ § Wikipedia deletion reversal
You are invited to join the discussion at WP:THQ § Wikipedia deletion reversal. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:49, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi Vanamonde93. Perhaps you can help this IP editor out at the Teahouse. They are claiming to be Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ared Arzumanian and want to get the article restored. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:51, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 March 2022
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:52, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

ANI report you may be interested in
An IP that I blocked as a sock of Baxter329 in the beginning of March is now complaining about that block here. I'm not well-acquainted with the events leading to Baxter329's block, I think I intervened after seeing a request for protection of Patrisse_Cullors and blocking that IP per WP:DUCK. OhNo itsJamie Talk 00:50, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Bit busy at the moment, but I'll try to keep an eye... Vanamonde (Talk) 02:39, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

DS Alert q
Is there an option under Twinkle to issue DS Alert notices? Thanks in advance from a rusty Abecedare (talk) 04:14, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
 * There isn't one in twinkle, but there's an equivalent script you can install; see User:Bellezzasolo/Scripts/arb. Simplified my life a lot when I found it. One note though; you usually have to click through twice; the first time triggers an edit filter and fails, the second time overrides it. Or at least that's how I think it works... Vanamonde (Talk) 04:20, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Will give it a try. Abecedare (talk) 04:26, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Works. And thanks for telling me about the reload requirement; naturally, I wouldn't have read the fine-print otherwise. :) Abecedare (talk) 18:27, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Glad to hear it :) Vanamonde (Talk) 19:25, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I tried it a while ago and gave up when it hit the abuse filter (should learn to read!) so this is really helpful. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by RegentsPark (talk • contribs) 15:29, March 19, 2022 (UTC)
 * The script works for issuing DS sanction notifications too. The only catch being that (unless I missed something) the sanctions still need to be logged manually even though the script's form has place to enter the 'Action (for WP:AEL)'. Abecedare (talk) 21:57, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Interesting, didn't know that. Good to know. I've levied a surprisingly small number of sanctions under DS (a somewhat larger number under GS, thanks to IRANPOL and social groups), so I hadn't bothered to find a shortcut, I think. Vanamonde (Talk) 03:33, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I use lots of scripts but found this one quite complicated..😳 I guess it has too many options for me. But I know the Am Pol and IPA alerts by heart, and have a note pointing to the sanction template, which is all I really need, so I'll continue to just type those in like I was a cavewoman. Bishonen &#124; tålk 07:24, 31 March 2022 (UTC).

WikiCup 2022 May newsletter
The second round of the 2022 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 115 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top seven contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 11 featured articles and the 79 good articles achieved in total by contestants.

Our top scorers in round 2 were:


 * 1) Epicgenius, with 1264 points from 2 featured article, 4 good articles and 18 DYKs. Epicgenius was a finalist last year but has now withdrawn from the contest as he pursues a new career path.
 * 2) 🇨🇽 AryKun, with 1172 points from two featured articles, one good article and a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews.
 * 3) Bloom6132, with 605 points from 44 in the news items and 4 DYKs.
 * 4) Transgender Pride flag.svg Sammi Brie, with 573 points from 8 GAs and 21 DYKs.
 * 5) Vexilloid of the Roman Empire.svg Ealdgyth, with 567 points from 11 GAs and 34 good and featured article reviews.
 * 6) Panini!, with 549 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and several other sources.
 * 7) 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Lee Vilenski, with 545 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and a number of reviews.

The rules for featured and good article reviews require the review to be of sufficient length; brief quick fails and very short reviews will generally not be awarded points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Assistance
Any chance you'd be able to help on an FAC article review prior to submission for Texas A&M University. Buffs (talk) 19:38, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid I simply do not have the time; I'm stretched very thin in RL right now, and haven't the time to do things on Wikipedia I'm already committed to. Moreoever, this article is outside my comfort zone, and would entail even more work on my part. Vanamonde (Talk) 21:01, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Understood. Thanks for the reply! Buffs (talk) 22:51, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Even a GA ought not to have lines like, The campus is part of Qatar's "massive venture to import elite higher education from the United States". TrangaBellam (talk) 20:16, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2022).

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Firefly • Sdrqaz
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Ad Orientem
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Geschichte • Ryan Postlethwaite • Sabine's Sunbird • Wassupwestcoast



Interface administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Evad37

Guideline and policy news
 * An RfC is open proposing a change to the minimum activity requirements for administrators.

Technical news
 * Access to Special:RevisionDelete has been expanded to include users who have the  and   rights. This means that those in the Researcher user group and Checkusers who are not administrators can now access Special:RevisionDelete. The users able to view the special page after this change are the 3 users in the Researcher group, as there are currently no checkusers who are not already administrators.
 * When viewing deleted revisions or diffs on Special:Undelete a back link to the undelete page for the associated page is now present.

Arbitration
 * has been updated to reflect current practice following a motion.
 * A arbitration case regarding Skepticism and coordinated editing has been closed.
 * A arbitration case regarding WikiProject Tropical Cyclones has been opened.

Miscellaneous
 * Voting for the Universal Code of Conduct Enforcement guidelines has closed, and the results were that 56.98% of voters supported the guidelines. The results of this vote mean the Wikimedia Foundation Board will now review the guidelines.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:14, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Liz Truss&#32; on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 17:31, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

GOCE April 2022 newsletter
Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:43, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

New administrator activity requirement
22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Million award for J. K. Rowling
What an amazing collaboration; kudos! Best regards, Sandy Georgia (Talk)  00:49, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * That is very kind of you; I don't think we could have gotten to where we are without your input either! Vanamonde (Talk) 17:12, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Patxi Xabier Lezama Perier page
Hi, A while back you were involved in deleting the Patxi Xabier Lezama Perier page. I've tried to flag it but I'm not sure how this pans out because it has DRAFT in the name? You might want to take a shufty? [[] Cheers Akerbeltz (talk) 22:11, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Probably a sock of Sorginak and you can tag it with a CSD G5. If Vanamonde hasn't taken care of it, I'll stop by and do so tomorrow. Also pinging Liz who deleted the last iteration. --RegentsPark (comment) 22:18, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks! :) Akerbeltz (talk) 08:52, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Deletion review for El Comité 1973
An editor has asked for a deletion review of El Comité 1973. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Jumpytoo Talk 03:42, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 April 2022
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:43, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:List of political parties in Italy&#32; on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 18:30, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2022).

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Colin M
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg David.Monniaux • Fribbler • Grue • Kpjas • West.andrew.g



CheckUser changes
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Ks0stm

Oversighter changes
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Ks0stm

Guideline and policy news
 * Following an RfC, a change has been made to the administrators inactivity policy. Under the new policy, if an administrator has not made at least 100 edits over a period of 5 years they may be desysopped for inactivity.
 * Following a discussion on the bureaucrat's noticeboard, a change has been made to the bureaucrats inactivity policy.

Technical news
 * The ability to undelete the associated talk page when undeleting a page has been added. This was the 11th wish of the 2021 Community Wishlist Survey.
 * A public status system for WMF wikis has been created. It is located at https://www.wikimediastatus.net/ and is hosted separately to WMF wikis so in the case of an outage it will remain viewable.

Arbitration
 * Remedy 2 of the St Christopher case has been rescinded following a motion. The remedy previously authorised administrators to place a ban on single-purpose accounts who were disruptively editing on the article St Christopher Iba Mar Diop College of Medicine or related pages from those pages.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:35, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:French Communist Party and &#32; Talk:Left Party (France) on "Politics, government, and law" request for comments. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 21:32, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Application for mentorship
I am looking for a mentor. I wanna go through a course under your tutelage for a period of time that you determine for a counter vandalism course and/or a course on proper page creation. After which I will be given rollback and new page reviewer privileges. I'm reaching out to you because I wanna do this the proper way. It will be a honor to learn. Cheers Amaekuma (talk) 07:33, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi there. I'm afraid I'm far too busy for Wikipedia at this moment; also, individual Wikipedians do not offer courses of the sort you want. If you're interested in spending more time on Wikipedia, my first suggestion would be to continue with the content work you have already begun: this page is one you might find useful. If you are still keen on anti-vandalism work, take a look at WP:CVA, but please remember that any work you do should be worthwhile in and of itself, not just as a means of getting rollback or other advanced permission. Vanamonde (Talk) 23:20, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

@Vanamonde Okay. Thanks. Amaekuma (talk) 07:03, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Andriy Biletsky&#32; on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 19:30, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Appeal of an Arbitration Enforcement sanction
Hi Vandamonde. Ypatch is currently appealing a sanction you placed on them at ARCA. A couple of us have indicated we would like to hear from you and I realized today you might not have received any notification that this appeal was occurring and so I am leaving this notice for you. Barkeep49 (talk) 21:18, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Vanamonde is traveling with spotty internet access so may not be able to respond. You might want to consider the appeal without waiting for a comment from him if you don't get something from him in a couple of days. --RegentsPark (comment) 19:23, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Apologies: as RP said, I've been travelling, with infrequent internet and little time. I sanctioned Ypatch essentially for displaying a battleground attitude. Before granting an appeal I would want to see evidence that going forward they will be able to engage constructively with users they disagree with within this contentious area. I haven't the time to evaluate whether that's the case, and am happy to leave that to ARBCOM's discretion. I do apologize for not filing the right forms logging the sanction; I do recognize the need for it. Best, Vanamonde (Talk) 20:47, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 May 2022
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:48, 29 May 2022 (UTC)