User talk:Vanamonde93/Archive 6

Please comment on Talk:Monarchy of Canada
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Monarchy of Canada. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Hillary Clinton email controversy
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Hillary Clinton email controversy. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Denial of the Holodomor
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Denial of the Holodomor. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Vanamonde93/sandbox/2002 Gujarat riots
User:Vanamonde93/sandbox/2002 Gujarat riots, a page which created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Vanamonde93/sandbox/2002 Gujarat riots and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Vanamonde93/sandbox/2002 Gujarat riots during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 04:27, 29 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Ricky81682, I created this 11 months ago with the intention of working out some structural issues with the article, which are easier done when a mistake is not immediately visible to the general public. I never got around to it for lack of time. Delete it by all means; if I find the time to work on this thing again, I can easily recreate it. I don't see who it is bothering, though; if there really is a good reason not to have a userspace version that I'm unaware of, let me know, and I'll tag it for CSD U1 myself, and we can skip the whole MfD process. Vanamonde93 (talk) 04:50, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I agree with your point but policy-wise, long-term testing is not permitted under WP:UP (short-term is fine and the page would just redirect to the article). One reason is that it's not obvious when it's benign attempts to work on a draft or people's passive-aggressive actions to keep a version of what they want after losing an edit war or whatever and this page has already required two bots to remove notices and categories and if there's redlinks, changes in templates, those need to be done, etc., etc. I think you get my point. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 04:55, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Ricky81682 Okay, that's fair. Since I have no intentions of working on it over the next couple months at the very least, why don't you withdraw the MfD, and I'll tag it for U1, and that way we save everybody a little time? As a matter of fact, thanks to your nomination I realized that I have a good many userspace drafts that I didn't move to mainspace when I created them (because I didn't know better); I'm going to go through these and dispose of them now. I presume that a redirect to the mainspace article is not a real problem? Vanamonde93 (talk) 04:59, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I can do it all as I'm an admin. If there's articles you didn't move (I checked the history at mainspace and saw you didn't create it), a redirect is fine but if it's more complicated (say you used a page for some editing and some for the draft or for multiple drafts or whatever), there's Requests for history merge or you can hit my talk page. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 05:08, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

All done! Sorry for the bother but Category:Stale userspace drafts is over 46k again and there's plenty of pages out there. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 05:11, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks! There isn't usually much useful history in my drafts, because I've always worked alone, so I think I'll just redirect the ones which I copy-pasted into mainspace, and tag the ones I did not. If there ever is a need for a histmerge I will let you know. I hadn't realized the category was so large; I'll be a bit more watchful in the future. Regards, Vanamonde93 (talk) 05:14, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of military occupations
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of military occupations. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Spandhana
Thanks for your prompt review & note! I should have included a newbie alert ;-) with my post. I realize that my post was brief and didn't yet include enough details to conform with the guidelines. I was still figuring out some of the syntax involved in creating the sections, and decided that I would first prepare a separate writeup and then come back to update post. But of course, it's all gone now! What's the best way for me to update the post with information to justify the notability? Should I just go back and edit the same page or is there another place I need to submit the information? Thanks! Arg0sdotin (talk) 16:12, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Arg0sdotin, welcome to Wikipedia. I would not advise creating the page again, even though you are technically able to do so, because the same notability concerns will likely be raised once more. The first thing you should do is to ask yourself whether that topic truly meets our notability guideline. If it doesn't, well, there's still millions of other things to write about. After you've read that page, if you still think Spandhana is notable, you have a couple options. You can create the page in your sandbox, where you can work on it without fear of it being deleted, and move it into article space when it's done. Alternatively, you could use the article's for creation process, which I would recommend, because you can get useful advice there as well. I hope that helps; let me know if you have further questions. Regards, Vanamonde93 (talk) 17:02, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

May I suggest...
...that you add WP:WikiProject_World%27s_Oldest_People/Article_alerts to your watchlist? EEng (talk) 00:17, 4 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Sure, I'll add it. I was planning on looking up most of those discussions in any case, since I'd closed a couple. Vanamonde93 (talk) 04:00, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Caste system in India
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Caste system in India. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Atlaans
Hi. Sorry, but you can't use A7 on languages, whether real or, like this one, constructed. I've prodded it. Peridon (talk) 15:34, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Okay. I think I posted on your talk at precisely the same moment. I'd be curious to see the guideline that says that, though; surely the list at A7 is inclusive, not exclusive? Vanamonde93 (talk) 15:37, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Umpqua Community College shooting
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Umpqua Community College shooting. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Trans-Pacific Partnership
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Trans-Pacific Partnership. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Marsy's Law (Illinois)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Marsy's Law (Illinois). Legobot (talk) 00:03, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Talkback
78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 14:37, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

WP:PERM Request
Your permissions request for User:Karellen93 has been completed. — xaosflux  Talk 17:11, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Vanamonde93 (talk) 17:12, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Monarchy of Ceylon
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Monarchy of Ceylon. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Banks
Yes, there was someone else who tagged a huge pile of these for A7 when I was doing some speedy deletion work, and I got rid of a load of them. I'm happy to take a look at the rest, there aren't as many as I was expecting, but feel free to tag any yourself. They aren't all obvious A7s, some include things like the total assets of the bank or relevant media coverage which could easily assert significance.  Hut 8.5  19:17, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * thanks - I'll take a look too. The ones you describe may have to be sent to AfD (or in some cases just expanded). As a side note; the creator of these has the auto-patrolled flag, given to them by . Is it perhaps time to review that user-right? Surely most of these would have been caught at NPP otherwise. Vanamonde93 (talk) 04:53, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * OK, I think I've got rid of the A7-eligible ones, there's only a handful left that haven't already been merged or redirected somewhere else.  Hut 8.5  19:49, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Vanamonde93 (talk) 05:12, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

DYK for 1946 Bihar riots
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

78.26's RFA Appreciation award

 * Thank you! Vanamonde93 (talk) 07:24, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:LGBT in Islam
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:LGBT in Islam. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Greetings
Happy Holidays text.png Hello Vanamonde93: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Tito Dutta (talk) 18:23, 25 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message
 * Thanks, Tito Dutta. The same to you and yours. Vanamonde93 (talk) 05:57, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks. --Tito Dutta (talk) 12:52, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Porur, Malappuram
The small village of Porur, Malappuram needs an article because it has its own Panchayati raj government and is not part of any other village. I can find more details on the village and fill them later. Regards, Prof. Manna (talk) 09:17, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Prof. Manna, Greetings. The village certainly needs an article, I'm not certain why you think I disagree. What I added to the page was a tag which said that it did not cite any sources. What you need to do it to add reliable sources to the article, so that it follows our policy on verifiability. If you need help with that, this guide might be useful, and feel free to ask me any questions you have. Regards, Vanamonde93 (talk) 12:55, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you Vanamonde93 for the link. Regards, Prof. Manna (talk) 13:47, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Cold War II
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Cold War II. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Malé Friday Mosque
Vanamonde93, the GOCE work that you wanted the nominators to request has been completed. Can you please return to see whether the article meets DYK standards now? Thank you. (If for any reason you can't continue your review, please let me know here and I'll put out the call for a new reviewer.) BlueMoonset (talk) 16:30, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Busy; give me a few hours. Vanamonde93 (talk) 16:58, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * BLueMoonset, I do apologize for the delay; I noted that this was finished, and somehow neglected to complete the review. I have done so now; please take a look. Regards, Karellen93 (talk) 00:24, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
 * It looks fine; all I did was adjust the ellipse spacing on ALT4. Thanks for finishing it off. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:36, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year Vanamonde93!


Happy New Year! Vanamonde93, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Tito Dutta (talk) 18:59, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2016}} to user talk pages.
 * Thanks muchly, Tito Dutta! The same to you and yours! Vanamonde93 (talk) 17:33, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Vanamonde93!


Happy New Year! Vanamonde93, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Rubbish computer (Merry Christmas!: ...And a Happy New Year!) 23:01, 31 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.


 * Thanks a lot, Rubbish computer! The same to you and yours! Vanamonde93 (talk) 17:33, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Vanamonde93!


Happy New Year! Vanamonde93, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Liz Read! Talk! 23:52, 31 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.


 * Thanks much, Liz! The same to you and yours! Vanamonde93 (talk) 17:33, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

WP:INDOPAK
Hi Van, Wishing you a Happy New Year! Would you be interested in joining WP:INDOPAK? - Kautilya3 (talk) 00:10, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Kautilya3, the same to you. I would certainly join in; the biggest thing on my to-do list right now is not south-asia related, but I think there's a lot of scope for helpful cooperation in the future. Vanamonde93 (talk) 01:42, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Actually, hold on a second. I just read through the board, and I really like the idea; but I am mildly uncomfortable with the "Indian and Pakistani" part of it. I would much prefer "India and Pakistan." This is Wikipedia, after all; we're not trying to resolve diplomatic issues, but presumably improve article relevant to both countries, an effort which non-Indian, non-Pakistani editors should feel comfortable joining. Perhaps more importantly, we should not require identification of this sort. I for one decline to comment with respect to my Indian/Pakistani-ness or lack thereof. There is a good reason I have the "global citizen" template on my userpage. Vanamonde93 (talk) 01:57, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Whatever you want, Van. I think Mar4d started it and he is now gone. I am trying to breath some life back into it. We can shape it whatever way we want. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 02:39, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

DYK
Mary Docherty is presently in Prep 3. Sometimes it takes a while for the page to refresh; it's happening on my computer too. You'll see it soon. Yoninah (talk) 01:31, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Yoninah, Then maybe the glitch is on my end? I cannot see it there; I can see only "avocado cake," "The Bleeder," "Caroline Stephen," "Salabacke Church," and "David van Rooyen." If it's at my end, of course, that's not a big deal, and sorry for bothering you. That seems to be it; I see it now. I guess I should just start assuming a time lag, rather than jumping to the conclusion that something had gone wrong. Vanamonde93 (talk) 02:30, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Militia occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Militia occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

3rd Opinion
Thanks, Vanamonde93 for taking a look at giving a 3rd opinion. I had thought that the process allowed for opinions after minor involvement of others of a sort that was matched by the discussion, but fair enough if you think their involvement was too great for it to be relevant. Sorry for taking up your time. DrArsenal (talk) 11:36, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
 * DrArsenal, the instructions at WP:3O say that only two editors must be involved in a dispute. If the involvement of other editors was truly minor or irrelevant, I would imagine that most folks would provide an opinion anyway; we're not a bureacracy, after all. In this case, I did not feel that the involvement of other editors was minor enough that I could ignore it. Regards, Vanamonde93 (talk) 15:57, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Mary Docherty
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Spanish general election, 2015
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Spanish general election, 2015. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks a lot, Philbutler. It is much appreciated. Vanamonde93 (talk) 16:52, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Martin McGuinness
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Martin McGuinness. Legobot (talk) 00:10, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Kissinger
I did state why! WeAreChange is a biased organization. Their opinion doesn't belong on Kissinger's profile! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:31FE:3440:A54E:35F6:FA78:122E (talk) 02:23, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Maybe; but you also removed the New York Times as a source, which is why you were reverted then, and also why you are being reverted now. You really need to discuss this first before removing it. Vanamonde93 (talk) 02:28, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Catalonia
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Catalonia. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:United States presidential election, 2020
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States presidential election, 2020. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Terrorism Template (Most Wanted Lists)
There are two parts in development for this template, which include a methodology of the handling of listed persons, or those who are listed as "terrorists." The first, was to introduce international methods of "listing" and the second, "status" of persons who are listed. These are not often expressed throughout "Terrorism" data or details, but co-exist alongside traditional apprehension "agencies" which have unfortunately funneled data throughout the entire portal. I do believe that it is self-explanatory that this methodology of "listing and capture" is well understood as an effective means according to their successes (located in graphs of subpages). If you can, please review the data of subpages, and inform me if you agree that such areas should exist within the template. If agreed, please kindly re-revert, and thank you for your interest in my contributions. Twillisjr (talk) 17:16, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure I understand you; where are these pages "in development?" The issue with your addition was that it was synthesizing a lot of pages not explicitly related to terrorism, but crime in general. That problem remains, and you need to discuss that at the template talk page, not here. Regards, Vanamonde93 (talk) 17:23, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

I wrote a message on the talk page as requested, and agree, that, perhaps at this moment in time, it is wiser to not combine criminal activity with terrorism directly. Point taken. However, if no replies occur, I may add only direct terrorism "most wanted" areas to the template page. Twillisjr (talk) 19:17, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jennifer Lawrence
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jennifer Lawrence. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:British Empire
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:British Empire. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

GOCE January drive

 * Thanks, Miniapolis! Vanamonde93 (talk) 01:46, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Muhammad
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Muhammad. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

deletion review
i have many sources from high beam and according to Wiki its a reliable and credible sources example 1) https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-420360879.html 2 ) https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-438991021.html 3) https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-417523826.html and i have about 10 more sources so can you give me a chance to add them and please review them its from credible source and one of the tools of search added by wiki Mohamed metawea (talk) 23:34, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Mohamed metawea, Welcome to Wikipedia. I'm not sure why you are contacting me in this case, but anyhow, here's a couple of things you should keep in mind. First, Highbeam is not a source, it is a database. It collects sources; some of these sources are reliable, and some are not, although mainstream media sources usually would be considered reliable. The second thing is that it's not enough for the subject of the article to be mentioned; there needs to be substantial coverage of the subject in the source. I can't check this, because I don't have highbeam access. Finally, since you have a few deletion notices on your talk page for multiple reasons, I would suggest reading over WP:COI and WP:GNG first; and then, if you are still planning on creating a page, I would suggest using the Articles for creation process, where somebody can check your work before it goes up in mainspace and possibly gets deleted again. Regards, Vanamonde93 (talk) 23:53, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your support

 * You are most welcome. I wish you luck with living up to your username :) Vanamonde93 (talk) 05:18, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biographies
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biographies. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Edmonson County High School
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Edmonson County High School. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

A cheeseburger for you!

 * Marknashtx, many thanks. I don't often eat burgers in RL, but I will consume this cyber-burger with relish. Cheers, Vanamonde93 (talk) 17:01, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Women's history month
Hi Van, For the Women's History Month, can we work on the Pandita Ramabai article? perhaps you might be interested too? - Kautilya3 (talk) 16:41, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Kautilya3, I'd be interested in principle, but it really depends on how busy I am then. Vanamonde93 (talk) 16:47, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Well, we don't have to do it in March of course. We are being encouraged to submit DYK's in March. - Kautilya3 (talk) 17:48, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * True. I would be willing to do some work on it. DYK is tricky, though; it's new articles, new GAs, or 5x expansions. This is not eligible for the first, and getting either of the second will be difficult. Vanamonde93 (talk) 17:50, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

@Kautilya3 Thank you for considering me and i would be very interested. But March perhaps wont work for me due to professional commitments. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Debasmitadeb (talk • contribs) 06:47, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Housing in the United Kingdom
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Housing in the United Kingdom. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Time Person of the Year
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Time Person of the Year. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Rafik Yousef
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Rafik Yousef. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Re: David Hattner
Can you clarify why you added the "clarification needed" tag to the article? It seems obvious to me (music influencing a musician), but I wonder you suggest specific wording. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:56, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Another Believer; It's quite a minor point, but I think a fair one; the influence manifest in Hattner playing classical music, or baroque music, or his particular instrument, or even his conducting style. Hence the tag. Regards, Vanamonde93 (talk) 23:08, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Adesayo Oyedijo
User:Vanamonde93 stated that Adesayo Oyedijo's profile reads like a resume. I totally disagree with with opinion because those are his achievements. A professor of that caliber with such achievements who got to the peak of his career deserves to be seen by the world. However, I support the opinion that this page should be kept. You may suggest ways to improve the page but deleting it would be absolutely improper.''' I vote for his page to be kept. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gboyeaig11 (talk • contribs) 14:59, 28 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Gboyeaig11, greetings. I'm glad to see your enthusiasm for editing Wikipedia; unfortunately, for a page to remain on Wikipedia, it needs to meet the notability guidelines. You need to find evidence that he meets these guidelines, and post it at the deletion discussion. Regards, Vanamonde93 (talk) 16:15, 28 February 2016 (UTC)


 * User:Vanamonde93Good to hear from you. I have checked the notability guide and the sources of article Adesayo Oyedijo are good and reputable sources. Alot of people have already seen his page and there quite a lot of readers who got motivated by his page. Hence, I am still strongly of the opinion that the page should be left alone. If you have any positive suggestions that would benefit the page, I welcome them. But to suddenly say you want to delete a page I worked on for one month is totally absurd. Did you even read through his profile before starting to make unimaginable comments about removing his page? I went through your articles and I do not see how they are better than Ade Oyedijo's page. I am totally perturbed and disgusted about your negative attitude towards a good and worthy profile. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gboyeaig11 (talk • contribs) 16:40, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Gboyeaig11, I don't think you have read the guideline closely enough. You need to provide evidence of substantial coverage in reliable secondary sources. You have not done so, and the place to do so is on the deletion discussion, not here. Please post any further arguments you may have at the deletion discussion. Vanamonde93 (talk) 18:21, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Campus sexual assault
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Campus sexual assault. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

GOCE February blitz

 * Thank you! Vanamonde93 (talk) 20:53, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ted Cruz
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ted Cruz. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Vladimir Putin
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Vladimir Putin. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of state leaders in 2016
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of state leaders in 2016. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks
For editing the Långholmens spinnhus article. Could you please at the GOCE tag to the articles talk page as well. Regards,--BabbaQ (talk) 19:49, 14 March 2016 (UTC)


 * BabbaQ, thanks, I knew I'd missed something. I've done it now, thanks. Vanamonde93 (talk) 21:27, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Compulsory sterilization
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Compulsory sterilization. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Federal Way Public Academy
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Federal Way Public Academy. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2016 U.S.–Iran naval incident
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2016 U.S.–Iran naval incident. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Happy Easter!


Thanks muchly, Wilhelmina Will! The same to you and yours! Vanamonde93 (talk) 01:54, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Letting everyone know that homosexual is the actual name for male with male.
Gay is in fact, the term for happy. Like I'm a gay man for my girlfriend is with me. Or I'm gay to know that I'm moving out soon of my parents house. Including my girlfriend is gay that she has a job. I'm gay to know that a friend of mine if going to contact me for a different job for me to work at. I'm even gay to know that I'm graduating soon. Homosexual only means a man likes, loves, enjoys or wants to be with another man. Might be weird; but it's the fact. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TimPrime1 (talk • contribs) 04:38, 29 March 2016 (UTC)


 * TimPrime1, I am aware of the history of the word, but usage changes over time, as it has done in this case; see the article on the subject "gay". Vanamonde93 (talk) 14:28, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Republican Party presidential primaries, 2016
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Republican Party presidential primaries, 2016. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2013 Egyptian coup d'état
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2013 Egyptian coup d'état. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Meat ant
Hello, I have a couple of questions in regards to some of the clarification tags you added. Thought I'd leave this before I address them so I know what the tags are actually asking. Cheers, Burklemore1 (talk) 08:13, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Left Hand of Darkness
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Left Hand of Darkness you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caeciliusinhorto -- Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 11:40, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors April 2016 Newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

March 2016 Guild of Copy Editors Drive Barnstar

 * Thank you! Vanamonde93 (talk) 03:26, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Left Hand of Darkness
The article The Left Hand of Darkness you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Left Hand of Darkness for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caeciliusinhorto -- Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 17:21, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Caeciliusinhorto, many thanks for a prompt and helpful review. Vanamonde93 (talk) 18:44, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of The Left Hand of Darkness at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!  Onel 5969  TT me 04:23, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

1862
The edit I made from the 1862 article is not vandalism. I removed most of the names for two reasons. One being not-notable. The other has to do with the Project Years in the 1907 section. Sorry about that. 142.161.251.189 (talk) 21:17, 10 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Indeed: I noticed, and left a message at your talk page subsequently. Go ahead and reinstate the edit, but do it without the "undid revision by XYZ" in the summary, and mentioning the discussion instead. It would help, too, if you created an account; people have a pretty low bar for vandalism around here, and the bar is perhaps lower for IPs than it should be. Regards, Vanamonde93 (talk) 21:20, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bernie Sanders
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bernie Sanders. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Operation Phou Phiang III
Hello,

I have revisited this nomination and emended it. I also gone to some lengths to address your concerns about content. Would you please continue the review?

Georgejdorner (talk) 16:01, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Georgejdorner I will, give me a few hours. Vanamonde93 (talk) 16:03, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted
Per your request (high time you made it!). Let me know if you don't want the flag anymore. Widr (talk) 20:57, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Many thanks, Widr. I will be sure to do so. Regards, Vanamonde93 (talk) 20:59, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

You've got mail!
The Masked Man of Mega Might (talk) 04:07, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Replied. regards, Vanamonde93 (talk) 04:26, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * minor follow-up. The Masked Man of Mega Might (talk) 04:38, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Education of the British Royal Family
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Education of the British Royal Family. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 15 April 2016 (UTC)