User talk:Vance256

May 2016
Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of Littlest Pet Shop episodes has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. CAPTAIN RAJU ( ✉ ) 17:26, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of Littlest Pet Shop episodes has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:58, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of Littlest Pet Shop episodes was changed by Vance256 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.852589 on 2016-05-16T02:58:46+00:00.

Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Secret Life of Pets, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sum mer PhD v2.0 04:16, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
Your addition to Finding Dory has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. McGeddon (talk) 12:33, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 7 June
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
 * On the The Secret Life of Pets page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=724174524 your edit] caused a URL error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F724174524%7CThe Secret Life of Pets%5D%5D Ask for help])

June 2016
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to The Secret Life of Pets. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A Google Book search for "(name of film) (word)" returning a result is not a reliable source for confirming that a particular character has that word as their name. McGeddon (talk) 08:46, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Littlest Pet Shop (2012 TV series). Electric Burst (Electron firings)(Zaps) 20:06, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Plot of unreleased film
Hello there. Thanks for your efforts to improve the article with a plot summary, but could you let us know where you got it from in the first place? I've started a discussion on the talk page. --McGeddon (talk) 08:44, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:20, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF). About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:15, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Your large plot additions removed
Please read WP:FILMPLOT which limits the plot section to 700 words. I use this online word counter tool to help me keep track. You might want to consider using such a tool yourself. Binksternet (talk) 15:47, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Your edit has been reverted. Your edit makes the plot explain almost nothing, and as such has been reverted. While the plot may be pretty long, there's no need to shorten it down to literally 79 words. - Kamran Mackey (talk to me · my contributions) 17:24, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * If you want to keep a plot that is sufficiently long, write one yourself or pare the old one down. There is no reason for the Beauty and the Beast article to violate the longstanding guideline. Binksternet (talk) 17:48, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * You can do that yourself, can you not? Without shortening the plot down to literally 79 words by the way, which is not sufficient enough for a plot section, as it explains very little about the film. - Kamran Mackey (talk to me · my contributions) 18:00, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * So you think it's fine for Vance256 to keep making too-large plot additions? Because your actions are telling him so. The guideline represents consensus, and has since you were six years old. Vance256 is creating problems with his additions, and he should start using a word count tool as I have recommended. Binksternet (talk) 19:49, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * No, I do not think it's fine for Vance256 to continue making too-large additions to plots. I of course want everyone to stick to Manual of Style guidelines (and related guidelines) as much as humanly possible. My argument was just that a single 79 word paragraph in the Plot section isn't really enough to fully explain the main Beauty and the Beast story in detail. That's all. Wasn't approving of Vance's actions. Just want plots to be as detailed as possible while trying to stay in the range of the 700 word maximum. :) - Kamran Mackey (talk to me · my contributions) 20:39, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

August 2018
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Toy Story 4. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''Your claim that Robert Costanza would be voicing Mr. Potato Head was not confirmed at all by the source you gave. In fact that source does not mention Costanza, nor the Mr. Potato Head character, at all. '' Jeh (talk) 22:48, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

August 2020
Hello, I'm Bovineboy2008. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Vivo (film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. BOVINEBOY 2008 12:13, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Raya and the Last Dragon, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. BOVINEBOY 2008 10:29, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Copyright violation
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the The Croods: A New Age article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site the statement: "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribute Share-Alike".

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the Help Desk. You can also leave a message on my talk page. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 17:22, 18 September 2020 (UTC)


 * In addition to several copyright violations, this clear vandalism is a problem. What's up? - Sum mer PhD v2.0 17:40, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

April 2021
Hello, I'm Tbhotch. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Beauty and the Beast (1991 film) seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. (CC) Tb hotch ™ 00:34, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Hello, I'm Pamzeis. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, My Little Pony: A New Generation, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Pamzeis (talk) 04:49, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Koati (film) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Koati (film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 08:05, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Brian Hull


A tag has been placed on Brian Hull requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/Brian Hull. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 03:47, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Koati (film)
Hello, Vance256. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Koati (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Scrooge: A Christmas Carol (2022) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Scrooge: A Christmas Carol (2022), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BOVINEBOY 2008 15:07, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Koati (film)


Hello, Vance256. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Koati".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:15, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Human Resources (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Big Mouth. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

December 2023
Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Yours, Mine & Ours (2005 film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 17:30, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Please use edit summaries
Hello. I have noticed that you edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! — Manticore  09:53, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

July 2024
Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the That Darn Katz! plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 14:52, 1 July 2024 (UTC)