User talk:Vandana-emax

What is your intent with the articles on Shakti Pumps?

One you marked for speedy deletion as con context, which does not apply, and then your contested the deletion tag you put on yourself; the other you have marked with a number of different inconsistent deletion tags. Furthermore, the two articles are identical. As reviewing administrator, I left the one with the right title Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shakti Pumps (India) Ltd., and deleted the other as a duplicate.

But I need to tell you that this will no make a satisfactory article

First, a Wikipedia article needs to show notability with references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. The links you listed at the boottom are links to the company's own pages, and will not do for the purpose. Then a Wikipedia article needs to be written like an encyclopedia article, not a press release--don't praise the organization, say what they do. Don't use adjectives of quality--they are just puffery, suitable for advertising, not for an encyclopedia. Remember not to copy from a web site, even your own -- first it's a copyright violation, but, even if you own the copyright and are willing to give us permission according to WP:DCM, the tone will not be encyclopedic and the material will not be suitable. (Thus, there is generally no purpose in giving permission; it is better to rewrite.)

Include only material that would be of interest to a general reader coming across the mention of the subject and wanting the sort of information that would be found in an encyclopedia. Do not include material that would be of interest only to those associated with the subject, or to prospective purchasers --that sort of content is considered promotional.

As a general rule, a suitable page will be best written by someone without Conflict of Interest; it's not impossible to do it properly with a conflict of interest, but it's relatively more difficult: you are automatically thinking in terms of what the subject wishes to communicate to the public, but an uninvolved person will think in terms of what the public might wish to know.

If you think you can do it right according to our guidelines, do so, but expect the article to be carefully checked for objectivity. and remember that if your organization is notable, other people will know it, and write the article. That you have to write it yourself tends to show just the opposite.

For further information see our FAQ about business, organizations, and articles like this and also WP:FIRST.

If you do not currently have the material to meet our standards, you can facilitate matters by placing at the top a line reading : , and it will be quickly deleted.. When you have the necessary material, then try again.  DGG ( talk ) 20:23, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get | live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Godimrm (talk) 02:57, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get | live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Snowysusan (talk) 10:17, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shakti Pumps (India) Ltd. concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shakti Pumps (India) Ltd., a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 16:28, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/shaktipumps concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/shaktipumps, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 16:34, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shakti Pumps (India) Ltd.


Hello Vandana-emax. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Shakti Pumps (India) Ltd.".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 14:03, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/shaktipumps


Hello Vandana-emax. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "shaktipumps".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 19:46, 15 December 2013 (UTC)