User talk:Vandanaahuja

Bhartiyavidya
The AfD discussion runs five days. Do you have verification of the notability of this independent of the source? Also, please put new AfD comments at the bottom of page so I don't have to keep moving them and sign your posts, like this: ~ Grand  master  ka  06:55, 20 July 2006 (UTC)


 * I'll try; keeping the article hinges on finding independent sources that prove it is notable (preferably in English, although we could get a few Indian editors to look at Hindi sources if they are found.) Grand  master  ka  04:46, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

2 references independent of source

1.http://www.mayocollege.com/ProjectITMain.asp A case studey from Mayo College...one of the top schools in India

2.http://www.apeejay.edu/sheikhsarai/infra.htm am including them in my article. --Vandanaahuja 05:29, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

What is the question?
Hello, you used the helpme tag. How may I help you? When you've asked your question, please put the tag back so we know to check back. Alternatively, you can join the Wikipedia Bootcamp IRC channel to get real-time help. (Use the web-based client to get instant access.) —— Eagle (ask me for help) 05:45, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I think the problem is what does the user have to do to save the article from deletion. The sources are well planned out; the problem is assertation of importance.  As it is, the article looks like Original Research with no real importance.  Try rewriting the article following the Manual of Style, and it may pass nicely.   T e  k e  05:49, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Yes...i need help in retaining the article...have 5 days to redo it from what i had posted yesterday...have included some references which are frm independent sources and changed the article a bit...will redo it again wrt the manual of style..maybe you could go through it in a while and let me know... --Vandanaahuja 06:10, 21 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Okay, what I'd probably suggest you do is open an article on a similar educational system and compare pages. The article you wrote sounds more like promotion, like an ad trying to get people to like it. It does not sound neutral. The thing you probably should keep in mind is that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia ... they're repositories of knowledge, and as such we can't be biased towards a subject when writing about it. We have to remain cold and factual in our articles.
 * Pretend there's someone out there who doesn't like the subject of your article and EVERYTHING you write that he disagrees with he's going to vandalize and ruin. What do you do? You only put cold, hard, true facts on the page. You prove your assertations by citing solid references that the other guy can't refute. You write for your enemy. Again, see WP:NPOV.
 * If you can make it sound neutral, sound factual, and sound like other articles on Wikipedia, you may well be able to save your article. If you can't, it will likely be deleted. You may wish to check out related articles that others have edited, contacting them, and seeing if they can assist you in making the article more encyclopedic in tone.
 * We have other people we're helping also, so we can't just stop that and write your article for you, I'm afraid, but if you make major changes that correct your article, please bring them to the attention in the AfD that it's currently in. You may be able to save it. ~Kylu ( u | t )  07:02, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Nomination of Bhartiyavidya for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bhartiyavidya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bhartiyavidya(2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. naveenpf (talk) 18:29, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bhartiyavidya


A tag has been placed on Bhartiyavidya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. naveenpf (talk) 13:22, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bhartiyavidya


The article Bhartiyavidya has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * I couldn't establish that this comes near to WP:NOTABILITY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 18:43, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Bhartiyavidya for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bhartiyavidya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bhartiyavidya & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 19:28, 13 May 2015 (UTC)