User talk:Vanderdecken/Archive 2

Happy Birthday!
Have a great day —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Adamcobb (talk • contribs).
 * Thanks, everyone! —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 10:45, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Your Motto Of The Day Responsibilities...
Please see Motto_of_the_day/Desk at vote in regards to the limitation of overseers. You have the election-deciding vote. I realise that you haven't internet access at present, however apparently you're coming back tomorrow. Thanks. David P. A. Hunter, esq. III Let us to it, Pell-Mell 09:06, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the unblock
Thanks for the un-blanket ban. Do you have any info on when the registered-users-unaffected-by-IP-bans whitelist is going to be implemented? —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 19:41, 12 October 2006 (UTC)


 * You're welcome. I've never even heard of that feature. Whenever someone makes an unblock-auto request, we do a few checks on their past history and then unblock the offending IP address and reblock it as anonymous only. --  Netsnipe  ►  19:44, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Upper Thracian Lowlands
Hi. You voted against the featuring of the UTL picture on the (totally valid, sorry about that) grounds that it was too small. The author has uploaded a new version, and there's a lively vote going on about which version to use. You might like to take another look. Also, my vandalism counter has a much higher figure than yours --Kizor 21:29, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks For The Welcoming
Hey, thanks for the welcome message you left on my user page. Good to see contributing SourceForts fans! See you around. --Stieffers 18:22, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia Weekly Podcast
If you have a logo in mind, we're certainly open to it, something that would look more natural in an iTunes thumb would be a good thing (tm) -- Tawker 06:27, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
 * JPEG's work great, the two sizes are 300*300 and 144*144 (pixels) - I really can't think of anything specific except that it looks good at small sizes (such as on an ipod etc) and is well, good looking :) -- Tawker 14:52, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

MP:Talk
I agree it was a bit brash of me. I removed that part because the apology had been made and accepted, but the section had deteriated into two people insulting each other. My reference to BEANS was a bit obtuse, I was trying to put a halt to the two(?) editors reverting each others' insults and etc. The whole section had very little to do with the main page and wasn't worth archiving. Normal practice is to remove all trace of a vandal, leaving a taunt just encourages them. --Monotonehell 21:33, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Munich
Would you like to participate in WikiProject Munich? Kingjeff 15:55, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

You don't need to know anything about munich and you don't have to have interest in Munich itself. Do you like sports or literature or something else? You could help in a area that you're interested in. Kingjeff 18:11, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Original idea
I redirected and merged original idea into originality. Fred Bauder 16:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Sprock
I merged the article sprock with Anastacia and it has been edited to suit the text, hopefully that will stop your complaining —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Conor moroney (talk • contribs).

Re: Three Mile Island
Because it is not a stub. Nowhere near it, for that matter. Search 4  Lancer  22:49, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

WP:UW
Hi,

You have put yourself as interested in helping out at WikiProject on user warnings. We are now at a stage where we are creating the new templates and are wondering if you are still interested? If so please visit the overview page and choose a warning type you wish to work on. There is a base template available here, which you can copy and use to get you started. Have a look through the redirects and see what old templates are affected and incorporate them into the the new system. Anyway, any questions please don't hesitate to give me a shout. Regards Khukri ( talk  .  contribs ) 09:02, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Your Google userbox
As per the userbox's talk page, the coloring style for the Google logo (namely G o o g l e ) is copyright, and thus, not suitable for use in the user namespace. May I suggest you use the standart userbox instead? Thanks. --May the Edit be with you, always. T- borg (drop me a line)  15:54, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Mottos
Does it not matter if mottos are approved or not? Or do people bring in those ones from the discussion? Simply south 17:50, 20 December 2006 (UTC)


 * so then if i have been adding random nominations i have thought of as i was interpreting the instructions that way, that does not count anymore? Simply south 17:56, 20 December 2006 (UTC)


 * what will happen to the other nominations that were still in review? They have not been either approved or rejected. Simply south 18:16, 20 December 2006 (UTC)


 * So it seems that despite votes it is only the moderator which counts? I think that is slightly unfair. Simply south 13:18, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Motto participation
Thanks, I'm still on board G  e  o. 20:45, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Motto of the day
First of all, I wanted to congratulate you on your amazing hard work in fixing up Motto of the day. It really helped clean things up. You also said to contact you if anything was missed. I looked through the (giant) nomination archive and found a few mottos that you neither approved nor rejected. The five I noticed were Naturalis Historia. Encyclopédie. Encyclopædia Britannica. Wikipedia. Evolution of the encyclopedia.What do you want to learn today?, W,I,K,I,P,E,D,I,A,, Life comes at you fast; Wikipedia is on your side., and Wikipedia: For all your editing needs.. So if you could judge those that would be great. Thanks again for all the hard work! -- Tewy  03:25, 21 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Also, you created an archive for the nominations talk page, but you didn't place a warning at the top or remove the redirect on the original page. I'll continue to look around to make sure everything is in order. -- Tewy  03:30, 21 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Oh, and concerning Tabled for discussion, what did you mean by TBH, we're desperate, few overseers are really active and this page is a mess: both get Rejected. Come back and try again if you must.? Could I renominate the two and try to get a consensus, or did you simply reject them because they weren't up to standards? -- Tewy  04:19, 21 December 2006 (UTC)


 * I think I can make the template change. I'm not sure though G  e  o . 17:37, 22 December 2006 (UTC) It worked. See 2-1 for example  G  e  o . 17:52, 22 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Okay I will try to backdate. G  e  o . 19:43, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Welcoming new users
Hey there! Just dropping in to tell you that it is rather pointless to go through Special:Log/newusers and welcome literally everyone there. Most (and I really mean most) of accounts never edit, so it's way better to watch Special:Newpages instead and find some real new contributors there (make sure you don't welcome vandals!). Don't take it personally - just letting you know that what you're doing now is considered a very bad practice by many people (who consider it a cheap way to raise one's edit count) and is frowned upon. Cheers, Миша 13 14:46, 23 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Okay, I understand. But take this: look at Special:Statistics - we have over 3 million users. Now, the welcome template you're using is 6410 characters long. This gives roughly 19 Gigabytes of text if we were to welcome everyone! 'Nuff said about numbers; it has also been common in the past for such eager "welcomers" to welcome vandals as well, which makes Wikipedia look stupid *g*. Finally, as of edit count, I don't judge people roughly by the numbers (only by decomposition by namespace), but some do and might view this spamming as a cheap way to increase the count. :-) Миша 13 17:50, 23 December 2006 (UTC)


 * I believe WP:DUU90 failed for an entirely different reason. Its implementation involved a mass "deletion" of accounts and people are still against massive unsupervised administrative actions. Plus, the "vanishing" of accounts would be bad for Wikipedia's image (i.e. a user comes back after a later date only to find that their login no longer works, or worse, the username has been usurped by someone else!). Миша 13 18:20, 23 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Hi, I'm a new user that just got a welcome message from you (Vanderdecken) and thought I'd put in my two cents. I appreciated the message.  I uploaded a photo yesterday that I thought might be a nice addition to the page on Kata Tjuta in Australia.  I don't use Wikipedia much, but a friend saw the picture and suggested I submit it.  I'm pretty clueless about how to navigate this site and clearly made some mistakes of protocol while trying to figure out how to make my submission.  So today I found what felt like a barrage of criticism for my missteps along with the "accusation" that I had just registered as a user before uploading.  Maybe that's just the wiki culture and I'm not familiar with it, but your messages of support (one personal, one that might have been an autoreply(?)) were the ones that made me reconsider my initial reaction which was to walk away.  Thanks.  I'll cautiously consider submitting other photos (and will try to be better at using the site properly). Arlen66 18:57, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!
 Merry Christmas, and  May the Edit be with you, always. T- borg (drop me a line)  19:27, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Mike1
I saw you welcomed Mike1 and I just wanted to inform you he is an ex-Wikipedian who has a few thousand edits. He left Wikipedia and asked for his user and user talk page to be deleted.

Just thought you might want to know. Also, look at contribs before welcoming users. That might help you.  Nish kid 64  23:39, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

 * Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays ! | A ndonic O Talk</i> 01:04, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

.

Thanks Vanderdecken! | <b style="font-family:Papyrus; color:black;">A</b> ndonic <b style="font-family:Papyrus; color:Black; font-size:small;">O</b> <i style="font-family:Times New Roman; color:Tan;">Talk</i> 20:55, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

motto
I've been meaning to get back onto that. Have been busy with work lately thanks to Christmas. Anyway, I'll help out now. Well, I'll help out after the tenth of January (I'm on a holiday until then, and have limited Internet access). Merry new year. (crazy). The Duke of Vanderdecken 04:15, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you
Hi Vanderdecken, thanks for the information. I will digest it, and apply it. Off on vacation (holiday) for three weeks, so edits and activity will be minimal until mid January. Thanks again. Jim CApitol3 14:09, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Hi there, thanks for the comment on how to make a signature, it was much appreciated. I think I must have accidentally switched the keyboard setup to British English hehe. Anyhoo, thanks for looking out for the new people :D

Bastetmeow 22:40, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Re: Portal (computer game) removal of image
I don't think the image makes too much sense for two reasons: First, it's way too small to actually find out what it's supposed to be. My first reaction was "What's this?" as I saw it. You can identify a flag at this size, but not that picture. Second, I think this is a fine example of Don't overuse flags (or world maps, in this case). There's just no real reason to have the map there, it's more confusing than it is useful. It's also misleading to state that something's available all over the world because you can download it, see Internet censorship in mainland China for example. --Conti|&#9993; 16:32, 30 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The whole point of the flags/icons is that everyone can quickly see where something is from. When you have to click on the image to find out what it is the whole point becomes moot. I know that the image is used likewise on other articles, but that doesn't justify its use. I'm trying to reduce the overuse of flags where I can see it, and this, in my opinion, is a prime example. We don't have to add images besides the publisher's name, so let's just do it where it is helpful for the reader. --Conti|&#9993; 19:43, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

animated picture
I know it's not against the rule to have an animated picture for a featured picture, but like I stated I just don't think it's right.-- ¿  Why  1  9  9  1  <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;"><i style="color:green;">ESP.</i> | <i style="color:black;">Sign Here</i> 13:41, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

3rr warning for Themodernizer
Hi, you left this warning on Themodernizer's talk page, warning him against edit-warring. Please understand that the person continually attempting to push this screenshot into the article has been repeatedly vandalising various Windows-related articles, as well as my own user page, because we're stopping them from pushing a large pile of screenshots with copyrighted Kids Next Door images in them, which is a clear violation of our fair-use policy. Have a look at the user's image uploads, for example -- notice how they're overwriting a number of fair-use Windows images to incorporate cartoon images. In some cases, the problem is that they are using a Windows Vista "lookalike" style to demonstrate Windows XP features, which is a serious concern since it misrepresents the visual aspects of Windows XP. Anyways, to make a long story short -- Themodernizer is upholding Wikipedia fair use policy, and fighting vandalism, by reverting this user's changes, and as such is not subject to 3RR. Thanks. -/- Warren 11:04, 7 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Regarding this, no, it should NOT. Please familiarise yourself with Wikipedia's fair use policy.  Unless the content is discussing Kids Next Door specifically in the article on Windows XP, or any of the other dozen-plus articles they've tried to insert inappropriate copyrighted content into, then absolutely no Kids Next Door content should appear in those articles.  This is NOT up for debate -- this is long-established policy.  Also, if by "in the past" you mean "just a few hours ago", then yes... please note that this user only logs in to do image-related work; otherwise they're usually editing while not logged in.  Here's an example from Windows Vista.  Here's another.  This has been going on for weeks... -/- Warren 11:17, 7 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Regarding this, actually, no, I'm not murdering piles of Muslims in the name of religion. I am, however, absolutely hellbent on building an encyclopedia that contains accurate, well-sourced information, is neutrally presented, and adheres to our fair use requirements.  As a regular contributor here, I'm sure you can relate to that sentiment.


 * "Proving" whether the anon IP (who vandalises Microsoft Windows articles with Kids Next Door bullshit) and Jigs41793 (who vandalises Microsoft Windows articles with Kids Next Door bullshit) are the same person is not all that important, but they did start at almost exactly the same time, and serve pretty much exactly the same goal of damaging the overall quality of the encyclopedia. New users whose sole purpose appears to be pushing their favourite children's cartoon into all the screenshots of a computing product are not working towards the goal of a better encyclopedia, and as such, all of their offending contributions need to be removed.  Fighting this vandalism wastes my productive time, and apparently it earns me the reward of having my user page vandalised, but whatever, someone's gotta do it.  -/- Warren 11:46, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Unsigned from Pincus666
Who are you? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pincus666 (talk • contribs).

K. Would you like to explain why you deleted my additions to the HL2: DM wiki entry? I am offended by this. I spend some of my time creating entries for it, all 100% factual, then you go come and flamen' remove all of it, even the external link to own-age.com under EXTERNAL LINKS. Now what the flamen' ell is that?

I’m fumen’

!

Unblock
You said: "Thanks for the un-autoblock, this happens quite often - my school or a proxy server used by it is autoblocked, so I can't edit from there. I assume by softening the block you meant allowing registered users to edit? Thanks anyway."


 * I did indeed. :)  Sometimes these things don't "take" for some reason, though.  --Yamla 18:38, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

In remembance of a great man
In remembance of a great man, let's spend some of our free time serving the common good by working on a great resource of free learning, Wikipedia. Today, give more time than you normally would, helping do the work that needs to be done to keep this project on track. Drop by the project page Martin Luther King Day of Service and do what you can. ike9898 04:04, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

WP:MOTD
Please see hitherward.

The Duke of Vanderdecken 05:24, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Re: my edits
I feel the rewording of the Daemon tools article was a good idea. Prior to my edit, it stated that emulation tools could be used to copy copyrighted material. You can copy copyrighted material without an emulation tool. It would be more correct to say that emulation tools could be used to copy copy-protected material or circumvent copy-protection. About the edit count, I can assure you that I am not hunting for a high edit count. If you look at my contributions, you can see that I often add a description, though it happens that I don't, I guess I could improve on that and try use the description field more. You can also see on my contributions that I do occasionally mark edits as minor, but I guess I could do that more often. -- Frap 19:19, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Your edits to Pure Pwnage
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Vanderdecken! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but please note that the link you added in is on my spam blacklist and should not be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an Imageshack or Photobucket image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was genuine spam, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 09:38, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Hmm. That was a revert, looks like I reverted a bad link back as well. I've changed it. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 11:47, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Re my (Anti American) Edits
I will admit that I was offended by American arrogance and over reacted, but is putting officially recorded information on Wikipedia really that anti American? I thought Wikipedia was for information not American propaganda. Anyway I have put my case in the discussion section's of Land speed record for railed vehicles and Empire State Express and I await to see if Americans can accept official information. I won't put the recorded facts on the articles for fear of been accused povy Oxyman 16:14, 28 January 2007 (UTC)


 * so is it ok to put "unverified information" in Wikipedia so long as it has an American bias? Oxyman 17:41, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

so is it ok to put "unverified information" in Wikipedia so long as it has an American bias? Oxyman 17:41, 28 January 2007 (UTC) The fact is that observers claimed the train reached 112 MPH. I have provided a well-researched citation for that claim, which itself points out the facts recorded. It's specifically noted that these were unofficial timers, so the reader can decide for themselves if that is or is not sufficient to claim the record. If you can WP:CITE sources that dispute the claim, please do so. Otherwise, you are only inserting your own personal opinion, which is not relevant to Wikipedia. -- Kesh 18:53, 28 January 2007 (UTC) I use copy and paste if that is the most appropriate way of posting information, Is that OK? Please realize that you are arrogant and stop putting thinly veiled insults everywhere, at least I am open about my insults."No. 999 entered service in May of 1893, making the trip from Syracuse, New York to the Chicago World's Fair. The Express was recorded traveling at 121.5 mph (195.5 km/h) during an exhibition run between Batavia and Buffalo on May 10, making No. 999 the fastest-moving manmade invention of its time and the first object on wheels to exceed 100 mph (161 km/h)".where in this statement is it mentioned and visible to the casual observer that this is an unoficial claim? Oxyman 19:08, 28 January 2007 (UTC) There you go with the reductio ad absurdum again - just calm down and think logically, stop making the silly, rash statements. It's mentioned at the bottom. You see the little number next to the end of that sentence that you mentioned? Like this: "making No. 999 the fastest-moving manmade invention of its time and the first object on wheels to exceed 100 mph (161 km/h).[1]" You see the little number one there? Click on it. It'll take you to the bottom of the page, showing you a link to a source in the references section below this comment (John Lienhard, Rain, Steam & Speed: Inventing Powered Motion) for that statement. This is what I was talking about earlier - the "to cite sources (give links to external, neutral and reliable evidence to support any points you make, see WP:FOOT for how to do it)" bit - this is how you use WP:FOOT. If you don't agree with that source, then discuss it politely on the article talk page, and stop being paranoid. Remember, There Is No Cabal, we are just trying to help. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 09:55, 29 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for explaining that aspect of wikipedia, the Arrogant insulting [user:Kesh] has written The article so that the casual observer will be mislead into believing these are official or credible claims with of course they are not, the claim lacks vital caveats I would be happy if it was clearly visible when reading the article that these are unofficial claims. I thought Wikipedia was about credible information not American propaganda. The Empire State Express is at present just a tool for Americans to rub their ego's the minimum that should happen is there be a disputed.

Oxyman 22:02, 29 January 2007 (UTC)


 * FYI, after I laid the NPA warning on this user, he stated on my talk page that he would cool down. Probably best to just monitor for now and see what happens; if he continues on, then a visit to WP:AN might be in order to see if an admin can cool him down. Tony Fox (arf!) 17:03, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Cicero Denounces Cataline
I'm sorry, but I can't remember where I got it from. It's been quite a while. RJC Talk 14:45, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you
Just wanted to proffer a very sincere thank you to you for catching the vandalism to the Langston Hughes article.:-)TonyCrew 17:56, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

I apologize. I saw the much improved picture quality earlier. My mind was just in "thank you" mode and I forgot. These vandals are just working my nerves. All the hard work one puts into an article seem to be for nothing every time they vandalize. Again, sorry and "thank you" for the much improved picture.TonyCrew 20:03, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

What have you done to my talk page!
Why did you use my own talk page to welcome me to Wikipedia? I've been on here for a while, and don't need that information there. 100DashSix 03:33, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Digital Blasphemy
Hi, Lenticel here. This is about the external reference I added to the article that was reverted. Thanks for pointing out that it was done in good faith. I added that link since I saw that the BBC link was mentioned in one of the two AFD's (for notability) for the article. I just thought that by adding a news article link about the site, it might be saved from another very time consuming AFD.

I admit that I am not well-versed in the art of referencing yet, but could you enlighten me about the cause of the revert? If you don't mind. You can tell me in my talk page. Thanks in advance. Lenticel 09:51, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for replying. I'll consider your advice in my other references ---Lenticel 00:20, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

quackking says adios
Thanks for the invite, but read on. Here's what I said to mujinga

I am fed up with this place.

I tried to create an interesting article (FYI, I am in no way associated with CHUNK 6.6.6., being a plus 50-ish multiple century (that is, 100-mile-ride) bike rider with a variety of interests, among which I do NOT include practical applications of anarchy) and the insinuation that it was some sort of vanity piece says a lot more about the person who said it than it does about me. The so-called 'removal of delete tags' or whatever you refer to, was not malicious, but in fact was a natural reaction by a fairly competent software dude (me) to what I thought was unexpected and unexplained behavior by the wiki engine - as soon as I realized that it was a PERSON putting in the delete tag I stopped removing it.

The smallest search of Wayback would immediately have revealed that the 'pretentious' phraseology this Hayworth character finds so non- whatever, was actually part of the manifesto of the group, a literal quote from their organizing documents (or whatever passes for the equivalent in an anarchist bicycle strike force.) Ditto the references to 'post-apocalyptic', and it is a serious violation of any editorial code worthy of the name to avoid substituting the editor's version of what is normative for that of his subject in a story. (Not to fly my flag, but I have published tens of dozens of articles in big trade papers, general circ mags, op-eds in the Christian Science Monitor, Detroit News and the Boston Globe, etc etc. I may not be Shakespeare but I also ain't chopped liver.)

Similarly I posted what I thought was a reasonable, inoffensive and informative piece on the etymology of the word 'Hoodsie', as is used in Boston slang.

Whack! 'WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A DICTIONARY' was the kindly comment which accompanied that particular commissar's judgment. Oh, really? I can point to dozens of similar definitional entries. But apparently there are those who have, in fact, woken up as Pope, and who enjoy swanning about waving 'delete flags', like some invisible squad of Red Queens in the increasingly unbreathable air of this through-the-looking-glass wonderland. 'Off with her head!'

These supercilious attitudes that seem to characterize many of those who appear to occupy the chairs of authority around here have chased me away. Puts me in mind of a 60's bitch slapdown between aging gays (again, I am not one of them either.) The only actual positive feedback I have seen here was relating to the first thing I posted, but I am afraid to even mention that, since it now seems highly likely that by calling attention to it I will doom it to a summary execution.

Remind me again of 'wiki standards'; is that some sort of digital version of the Academe Francais?

I thought not.

Good luck with reviving the post, but another French phrase (translated here) seems likely to be the reward - 'The more you kiss their ass, the more they shit on your head.'

Goodbye. Quackking 03:55, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Cheers
Thanks for the welcome, I doubt I'll find time to add any major pieces to the site, but will be happy to correct any errors or major problems I come across - with some talk page action in advance if needed. ;-) SubWolf 19:25, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Welcome!
You sent me a welcome message. Although I am flattered, I've been here around 2 years. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SpongeBrain (talk • contribs) 01:11, 17 February 2007 (UTC).

Thank you for your welcome message! I am quite new here. And thank you for your offer of help, because i am going to use it now! (I hope youre not to stressed...) I am sure that this is described somewhere on the help pages, but if it is, my brain have overlooked it - and if it is not, the reason is probably because it is so simple i should be embarrassed to ask about it; how does one make the categories on the end of the articles? --Aciram 14:59, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

WP:UW future?
Hi Vanderdecken,

Sorry for the blatant spam, but you have yourself down as interested at WikiProject user warnings WP:UW. There is a discussion on going here that might be of interest to you about the future of this project. There are two strawpolls on the talk pages and the second one is about the future of the WP:UW project. Now we have the end in sight we are looking at wrapping up the project and merging it with Template messages/User talk namespace WP:UTM and creating a one stop shop for all userspace templates. As you have yourself down as interested in this project we thought you may have some input on this issue, and would like you to visit the discussion and give any thoughts you may have on the matter. Cheers Khu  kri  10:37, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks from Stozball
Hello Vanderdecken,

I just wanted to say thanks for the welcome message on my talk page. Where I work we have actually set up a wiki for our internal documentation, so I've read through quite a bit of the wikipedia help resources and policies, but I still wanted to say thanks for taking the time (or programming the bot ;-) ) to leave a message on my talk page. I've always observed wikipedia to be a really friendly place, and kinda half expected to get some kind of message once I made an edit.

I do actually have a question that I've never been able to find an answer to. Do you know any way to make the link when you click on an image take you to an article instead of the images description page?

Also when writing on my user page should I use first or third person? I'm asking because I've read the page doesn't actually belong to me.

Thanks for your willingness to help,

Stoz

A WikiProject you may be interested in...
Hi there! I notice you're from Surrey - please take a look at WikiProject Surrey, which I started earlier this afternoon. Cheers.--Vox Humana 8&#39; 21:35, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Reshot image
Please revisit []. I have reshot. Any minor adjustments would be welcome. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 20:33, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Timothy Blackstone Library Plaque
Please add an appropriate credit for yourself to the picture. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 15:28, 24 March 2007 (UTC)


 * P.S. I was noticing the book cart behind the picture. Does that add authenticity to a Library Plaque or distract you from the plaque?  I could move the cart and reshoot. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 15:31, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

FPC reshooting 2
Once you cropped out the bookshelves, the bookcart did not look so good to me. Do you think Image:Timothy Blackstone Library Plaque3.JPG would make for an even better FP? If so, I would appreciate your cropping assistance. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 17:43, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

/Status fair use image
This is just a friendly notice that I removed the fair use image from User:Vanderdecken/Status. A suggestion: you might want to use the code... Current contribution status:BlissWatchlist heaven ...to link the text to the image. Cheers!  W ODU P  00:21, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg
You're too kind! Thank you! :-) Stannered 22:42, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up ...
... on my user talk page. I didn't know that editing one's talk page was vandalism. I restored the two tags, and will punish myself senselessly. Mike Helms 14:54, 3 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the welcome. You would think someone would welcome me after 600+ edits.  :-)  Mike Helms 14:59, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Help Desk question about show/hide
Hello. I responded to your question about the show/hide script earlier today, but forgot to leave a note here for you in case you didn't get around to checking it. The gist of it is as follows:

Title here if applicable Content goes here

You can place that code within another div, or even within a wikitable (which is often the best way, from a style perspective). Good userpage, by the way; we have the same kind of taste in radio comedies! Any questions; feel free to post a message. Regards, Adrian   M. H.  20:34, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Re: Explosions!!
Hi! I'm Gabycs, and I saw your comment on my talk page. First, though, thank you so much for welcoming me to Wikipedia! It kinda started out as me researching a science project on Wikipedia, and then I made an account so that I could get involved in editing and improving articles. Now, I try to get involved as much as I possibly can! I thought nobody would ever write on my talk page, so I thought it was pretty cool when i saw that I got a message from somebody! About that Explosions pic, I think that picture is AWESOME!!!!!! WHO DOESN'T LIKE EXPLOSIONS!!!!!!(no, i'm perfectly calm) Anyways, thanks for welcoming me! Regards, --Gabycs 01:10, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

RE:Your voting template
In fact, I don't have a template, I just type out the full image name. I think I was using 20px instead of 15px because in the latter size, the image looks slightly distorted. I'm going to start using 15px (I wonder if using those images is acceptable at MOTD). Nice to know that somebody notices my work!!  ~  St ep  tr ip   13:37, 6 April 2007 (UTC)


 * I've created an über-voting template. All you need to type is . It even includes the vote pictures. Feel free to test it in the sandbox.   ~   St ep  tr ip   13:56, 6 April 2007 (UTC)


 * On a completely different subject, why did you quit MOTD (or stop contributing to it as frequently)?  ~   St ep  tr ip   20:12, 6 April 2007 (UTC)


 * I hate (actually deplore and loathe would be more accurate terms) to sound so much like this, but in WP:SUBST, the policy states that templates calling to ParserFunctions should not be subst'ed. On another different subject, you revived MOTD twice?!?!   ~   St ep  tr ip   20:36, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Since you gave a link to humorous vandalism at MOTD, I'm going to give you a link.  ~  St ep  tr ip   23:14, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanksing You
Hey, Vanderdecken. Thanks a lot for your insightful comments on the Main Talk Page (probably archived by now. *Sigh*), the atomic bomb stuff. It sometimes takes a fright to put things into perspective. It also sparked a really great conversation with my Dad, with whom I don't do nearly enough. Seriously: look out for that book, 100 Suns, by Michael Light. I'd give you a link, but all online records of it are suspiciously inaccessable... Gold fritter 19:31, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you, for thanking me, for thanking you. It was a pleasure. Library? Do those still exist? :D Gold fritter 06:30, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

?
Welcome, Penubag! I noticed that you joined the discussion on WP:FPC. Participation in the community is encouraged, of course, but your status as a brand new user means that your opinions might not be counted. Please understand that this is a common practice on Wikipedia, and it is necessary to prevent deliberate misuse of our discussion pages. Our discussion processes value consensus over raw numbers and reasoned debate over simple voting. However, please do make further contributions to Wikipedia and express your opinion on policy matters. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 10:14, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( Penubag 10:24, 13 April 2007 (UTC) ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 10:14, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Did you tell me this because I forgot to sign one of my posts? Sorry if I forgot to sigh one post. BTW, I've been on wikipedia for a year. Talk to you later! =-] --Penubag 10:24, 13 April 2007 (UTC)penubag
 * Yes I guess you were right. After the four tildes, I always type my user name. But I never really realized it/didn't really care that I was doing it incorrectly. Next time I will just click the sig button(tildes) without signing my name, as I am going to try right now. Thanks a lot Vander! --Penubag 11:00, 13 April 2007 (UTC) EDIT- That's a lot easier, thanks again!

Welcome message
Many thanks, that should prove useful. Pstuart84 Talk 15:55, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Minor edits
Hi Vanderdecken. It seems that you have checked the "Mark all edits as minor by default" box in your preferences page. Minor edits, as explained at Help:Minor edit, are edits that the editor feels do not need to be reviewed by other editors. Nominating a page for deletion or adding a comment on a talk page is not a minor edit. Cheers, --KFP (talk | contribs) 19:46, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

To Vanderdecken... Greetings...understand you live in England...Jolly good. I graduated from High School in a place called Upper Heyford near Oxford...Now living in the USA.

Thanks for the comments on my Wikipage about Korean Pottery. Last October this page was nominated for deletion and after much discussion was reccommended to keep with clean up...........................I have been working on the clean up since then. Please read the comments of the deletion discussion that can be found on the Discuss This Page Link. I really believe that deletion of this page and its photographs would be a loss to Wikipedia and to students who search the internet for research source material. Deletion from Wikipedia will lessen the archive value of this encyclopedia. MVCOL

Mirrors
Thanks for the help with the mirrors. I will definitely install that extenstion. shijeru 19:55, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Why Not Adminship?
Looking over your user page, I saw that you had displayed a userbox saying that you wouldn't want to be a wikipedian administrator. Just out of curiousity, why not? You have so many contributions and edits, you are probably over-qualified! Respond on my talk page, if you will. Regards,  Gaby c  s .

Re: A test1 notice on my user talk
You seem to have put a test1 notice on my user talk page regarding some edits made on March 24, 2007. I wonder what edits you might be referring to, as I fail to see anything at that date on my contributions page. Also, I don't remember doing anything that'd warrant a test1 notice. Would you care to explain? Thanks in advance; cheers, Divide 21:33, 25 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Thank you for taking your time and answering my concerns. I'd be grateful if you could elaborate just a little bit further, as, although you answered my original question, you caused some new ones to appear: I fail to see, why revert? The table is obviously empty and I can't see what purpose is it supposed to serve... I just assumed someone put it there as a test (or maybe to be expanded later) and left it there. Or maybe I'm missing something? Which specific policy are you referring to? TIA for bearing with me.


 * (Oh, and BTW, I'm not that new of a user... I've been here since... let's see... sometime around 2001. I only created an account some time later, though, and have never really gotten to contributing much. But forgive my digression, I take it that a) it is inconfirmable (well, User:taw could confirm, perhaps, but) b) it doesn't really matter, and c) as far as number of contributions is concerned, I could very well be classified as a newbie.)
 * Divide 12:27, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

What?
"Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, we must insist that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on WP:FPC. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —Vanderdecken ∫ξφ 10:55, 28 April 2007 (UTC)" What is not civil about saying that something is pointless and of low quality, which was moreover expressed by others, too? It's my opinion based on what I think and I didn't say something like "this sucks" or "fuck you" or so. Oh, and I don't like blind patriotism and righteousness because it always leads to tragedies. And again, it's my opinion so respect it. --Svetovid 11:13, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

New signature
Hi Vanderdecken. How do you like my new signature (I'm asking this because I modeled it after yours)? Also, I just want to let you know that this is not my primary focus and, as a result, I just got bored and fiddled around with a new sig. One more question: Where did you get the name Vanderdecken?  ~ Magnus animum   ∵ ∫ φ γ 13:43, 28 April 2007 (UTC)