User talk:VanessaFaye

Speedy deletion nomination of Fantastic Services
Hello VanessaFaye,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Fantastic Services for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. scope_creep 14:37, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Fantastic Services Deletion
Hi VanessaFaye The article was promotional, which meant it read like an advert stick, and advertising is now allowed on WP, i.e banned. It had no WP content, or encyclopedia content in it. WP is not a directory. For an article to be created with sources and accepted by WP, it must have both the encyclopedic content, and the sources, primary, i.e discuss the content of the article, and secondary, reflect on the content of the article, which verify the content. VerifiabilityVerifiability is now critical to ensure the content is what it is, i.e factual. Also the article content needs to be notable: WP:N. Each article can only exist, if the article subject is notable. I think for a newish company, which is essentially a service agency, notability is hard to determine, as many there is many thousands of similar agencies operating in the UK. If you are looking for articles to create, which are actually needed, take a look at Requested Articles: Requested articles. Every one of these is needed somewhere in WP. There is also this: Your first articleand this process for new articles requests: Articles for creation scope_creep 11:42, 30 October 2015 (UTC)