User talk:Vanessa Mark Brooks

October 2019
Hello, I'm Jdcomix. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Graham Reynolds (composer)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Jdcomix (talk) 19:30, 23 October 2019 (UTC) Hello, I did it by mistake - I intended to insert a couple of reference links. Please, do not consider my error as vandalism or anything of that kind--Vanessa Mark Brooks (talk) 19:33, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

April 2020
Hello Vanessa Mark Brooks. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Vanessa Mark Brooks. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 11:51, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello, GSS, I'd like to inform you that you are mistaken as I'm not not being directly or indirectly compensated for my edits and I do my contributions voluntarily based on my curiosity and free time since I'm autistic and Wikipedia has been very helpful in my little world (until now). I'm also very depressed by the coronavirus outbreak since one of my relatives died due to the complications, so I apologize if I respond with delay. Also, I've noticed that you tagged some of my contributions and also removed Harriet Zinnes article - it is extremely stressful and discouraging to see as I worked really hard on those pages. Please, let me know what is wrong with them. With regard, VanessaVanessa Mark Brooks (talk) 21:17, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:27, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Mark L. Rockefeller for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark L. Rockefeller is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mark L. Rockefeller until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  scope_creep Talk  20:31, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Harriet Zinnes moved to draftspace
You'll need to adhere to WP:COIEDIT — Nnadigoodluck  █ █ █ 02:22, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Paul J. Menta


Hello, Vanessa Mark Brooks. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Paul J. Menta".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:17, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of One Tree Planted for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article One Tree Planted is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/One Tree Planted until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Amon Stutzman (talk) 00:03, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Gege Gatt for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gege Gatt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gege Gatt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Amon Stutzman (talk) 00:05, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Gege Gatt for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gege Gatt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gege Gatt& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. ARandomName123 (talk) 17:35, 28 June 2023 (UTC)