User talk:Vanilla Wizard/Archive 124

My nomination in INT section
Hi. I nominated my article in, in the news section, for first time. You mentioned your comment about my blurb and whole work and you were oppose totally. I want to say you that I used your helpfully comment and corrected some of my Article problems. I also suggested some new blurb. Please check them and reconsider about your comment, if it is possible. Thanks a lot.Forest90 (talk) 13:44, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Forest90. I initially marked my !vote as a "weak oppose" to indicate that I'd be willing to support it if my concerns were addressed, and I see that you've been working hard to address them. I'll strike my original !vote and leave a new one. :)     Vanilla           Wizard      💙 20:19, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

A waste of electrons
That was a completely pointless note you left on my Talk page about the thoughts I expressed at ITN. I am already well aware of the precious sensitivities of Admins towards any criticism. The management of that page is appalling. It's one of the places where Wikipedia's biases are constantly on full display. As I said there, I only use it to promote important items from my culture, one that is obviously well outside the areas of interest of any of the Admins there, and which need pushing bloody hard to ever get posted in a timely manner, if at all. My actions achieved my goal. I am happy. I don't really care what the Admins there think, and your note simply reinforced my negative views. HiLo48 (talk) 02:55, 17 September 2019 (UTC)


 * I was just using the friendliest possible reminder template to remind you of the civility guidelines on the encylopedia, as your comments against Muboshgu were quite uncivil, but if you wish to double down by calling me "a waste of electrons" then I can tell that you've not learned any lessons today. Let's hope that you do some day. Best regards,     Vanilla           Wizard      💙 03:04, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * My criticism was directed at the comment, not theperson. It's the inability of people like you to see the difference, AND the significance of that difference, that seriously depresses me about Wikipedia at times.
 * You didn't specify that my comment was "a waste of electrons" when you showed up on this user talk page, and phrases like "the inability of people like you" without question violate WP:NPA. This would've all been avoided if you didn't keep escalating when asked first at ITN and second at your talk page to bear in mind the basic civility guidelines, but if it's not possible for us to have any civil interactions without you persistently arguing at my user talk page, then something has to change. This has to stop, one way or another. Either your attitude improves, or it doesn't. I've never sought to bar a user from interacting with me, or to prevent them from editing in a particular topic area, and I honestly wouldn't even know the proper channels to do so. It's a headache that I'd rather avoid. That said, what's happening right now is already a headache that I never wanted to deal with, and I'd hope that you don't wish to further it.     Vanilla           Wizard      💙 06:54, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * , and that's why I regret not violating WP:POINT. You need a serious attitude adjustment. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:27, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * My attitude is to try to make Wikipedia the best it can be. That just ain't happening at ITN when it takes a couple of hours for an American hero's death to be posted, and nearly a day for someone Americans don't know. Will you guys ever acknowledge that there is a problem? HiLo48 (talk) 06:34, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * For anything to be posted on ITN in one day or less is actually impressively fast. Even uncontroversial nominations for notable events may still suffer from quality concerns, as is usually the case with brand new articles for breaking news stories. You could've just added "(Ready)" to the title. That would've caught the attention of the administrators. For reasons that I cannot understand, even now - long after you got exactly what you wanted - you're still needlessly being hostile to everyone who crossed your sight in that exchange, even now that there's no goal for you to achieve. This is not okay.     Vanilla           Wizard      💙 06:54, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

HiLo
This guy has a long history of abusing other editors. He is unable to appreciate viewpoints other than his own, a trait shared with Don Trump. He's not going to listen to others, so it's best not to waste effort. Just roll him back and move on. --Pete (talk) 00:05, 22 September 2019 (UTC)