User talk:VanishedUser 202207010000

Welcome!
Hello, S 0524, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -🐦Do☭torWho42 (📼) 10:03, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Non-free image use
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to a page, specifically List of passports, may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 20:57, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

June 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lok Ma Chau Control Point. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Citobun (talk) 16:09, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Stop
Stop merging Hong Kong and Chinese control points without discussion. I have put a lot of work into the Hong Kong articles. Citobun (talk) 16:11, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
 * @User:Citobun, It doesn't make sense to have 2 different pages for the same checkpoint. Many such pages have already been merged between other jurisdictions. Please read WP:MERGE and WP:CONTENTFORKING. The same border crossing cannot have two different articles. S 0524 (talk) 16:24, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
 * They are separate facilities, with different names. Citobun (talk) 16:25, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
 * @User:Citobun, They are the same checkpoint, please read WP:MERGE and WP:CONTENTFORKING S 0524 (talk) 16:34, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
 * This is an incredibly sloppy way of "merging" the articles. The original content is written with the Hong Kong context in mind. The article doesn't even make sense following your "merger" because they are different subjects. Citobun (talk) 16:35, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Please discuss before doing these mass merges! Citobun (talk) 16:39, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
 * @User:Citobun, discuss before you revert my constructive edits S 0524 (talk) 16:41, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
 * @User:Citobun, for example you can have one article for Kennedy Town station and all details in it. You can't have seperate article for the same topic like Kennedy Town station Exit A or Kennedy Town station Exit B, etc, I hope you now understood WP:MERGE and WP:CONTENTFORKING. One article for the bordewr crossing, with details about the two jurisdictions - their name and transport etc in on e article. Good luck S 0524 (talk) 16:48, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
 * That's not an apt comparison. Kennedy Town station is one facility. Two border facilities, with two operators, two different names, two histories, two countries... are not. Citobun (talk) 16:55, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
 * @User:Citobun,Then why don't you make Hong Kong International Airport in to Hong Kong International Airport Terminal 1 and Hong Kong International Airport Terminal 2? You can't have multiple articles for the same facility. Each border crossing should have one artcle with information about two jurisdictions sharing it. A border crossing is A BORDER CROSSING, not two to have two pages. A border crossing has a history, not two histories. Look at List of Mexico–United States border crossings, San Ysidro Port of Entry, Malaysia–Singapore border, Johor–Singapore Causeway, Malaysia–Singapore Second Link, etc. PLEASE LOOK CAREFULLY! Good luck. S 0524 (talk) 17:06, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Second option here. Shenzhen Bay Port worth to have one article because juxtaposed controls. The other is not so that they should have a pair of articles. Also. Most WP:Merge need a discussion thread. Bold merge are eligible to immediately revert. Matthew hk (talk) 08:45, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

While for terminal 2. Actually it may work to create an article as the old Terminal 2 is a WP:GNG passing shopping mall. It lack real facility and everyone rely on underground train to use terminal 1 facility. Also, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXIST. Please start WP:MERGE discussion, instead of using "X is situation A, so that Y must follow X to use situation A style of article" type of logic. Matthew hk (talk) 13:31, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Okay, I will not re-merge these pages without further discussion and consensus S 0524 (talk) 06:46, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

ANI Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Citobun (talk) 16:50, 7 June 2021 (UTC)


 * May be late reply. S 0524, your edit in Template:China–Hong Kong border crossings nowhere qualify for a minor edit. Matthew hk (talk) 08:40, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Isn't my edit there well-grouped and more structured and an enhancement? S 0524 (talk) 06:47, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:HKSAR passport cover (biometric).svg
Thanks for uploading File:HKSAR passport cover (biometric).svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 10 January 2022 (UTC)