User talk:VanishedUser 2313214sad1/CVUA/Jackson Peebles

Hey :)
Great job with the first unit! Are there any specific questions you have before we continue? I have posted the second unit on your page if you want to start. I also posted a reviewing unit, but it is mostly hands on, so we have to wait until your request is accepted. Thanks! —  nerd fighter  21:22, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you! No, I don't believe so; Twinkle makes dealing with vandals rather easy.  Would you be comfortable advocating on my behalf alongside Go Phightins! at |Requests for Permissions with the comment that I've requested education on being a reviewer?  I'll be starting the next unit, soon!  Thanks again!  Jackson Peebles (talk) 21:50, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Wrong link? Sure I'll drop a mention :) Thanks! —  nerd fighter  21:56, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Lol, that's a good way to set a positive impression! That's also what I get when I'm making edits while posting on talk pages!  Thanks, and fixed! Jackson Peebles (talk) 21:57, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Haha, no worries :) I posted to the Requests for permissions:Reviewer for you. —  nerd fighter  22:08, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Great work!
Great work on the CVUA page! I responded to some things, and I will post the next unit soon. I will not be online for about an hour, but when I am back I can answer any questions. Thanks! —  nerd fighter  22:52, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I posted a whole bunch of units quickly, but take as much time as you want. I just posted them all at once because I know you like doing them quickly ;) —  nerd fighter  00:47, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Scenario
Pretent I am a new editor with about 70 edits, and no warnings. I blank the sexuality section of the human article and delete the naked people image. You then revert the edit and place a level 1 "Wikipedia is not censored" warning on "my talk page" (as you should have). Next I post an angry message on you talk page. You will find this message below... —  nerd fighter  01:57, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Gosh, you certainly came up with an uncomfortable scenario, though I can totally see this happening. I already told them that Wikipedia is not censored.  However, in this case, as the other editor clearly feels very strongly about this, I will try to explain why I am not endorsing pornography, but, rather the study of anatomy.  I will also provide guidance on how to avoid seeing these images when logged in.  However, as they made a legal threat, this gets serious.  I will immediately contact the administrators at AN/I, referencing WP:NLT; I will do this even before replying to them. Jackson Peebles (talk) 02:10, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I moved your post up here. Please pretend that the below conversation is you actually talking with the angry user. Yes I understand this is a tough one, but after this you will be able to handle everything ;) —  nerd fighter  02:25, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Step by step
Please continue the following list:
 * 1) You reverted an edit
 * 2) You post a level one censor warning posted to talk page
 * You receive an angry message
 * 1) You contact the administrators at AN/I, referencing WP:NLT
 * 2) You post an informative message back referencing WP:NOSEE
 * 3) Post a legal template, as shown below.
 * 4) user blocked indef. ✅

conversation
'THE FOLLOWING CONVERSATION IS A SCENARIO CREATED FOR THE CVUA''. DO NOT TAKE IT SERIOUSLY''' You for some reason deleted my edit because you think that pornography is OK on an encyclopedia made for children. Put my edit back up RIGHT NOW or I will contact the authorities. - Angryuser123450 2:07, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi, Angryuser123450. I'm sorry that you've run into this problem, and I can certainly appreciate the fact that you're upset.  As I mentioned previously, Wikipedia is not censored.  However, there are a number of tools that you can use to block images from appearing on Wikipedia, and you can explore these options at WP:NOSEE.  The images in question are intended to benefit the study of biology and human sexuality, and, while I realize that this is a sensitive issue, the general consensus is that the content should remain for those who are studying these topics or who would benefit from this knowledge.  If you have any questions as to how to implement the tools listed at WP:NOSEE, please ask at WP:Teahouse!

I have also taken into consideration your concerns regarding the authorities. In order to better assist you, I have notified the administrators at WP:ANI and am posting a template, below, for your reference:

Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you.

Night
Sorry for the uncomfortable scenario. However, at some point you may have to make hard decisions as to what to do. If the scenario I gave makes you really uncomfortable, just remove it and I will add a less uncomfortable one. Note: it will still include the legal challenge. Thanks, —  nerd fighter  02:53, 20 February 2013 (UTC)