User talk:VanishedUser sdu9aya9fs783/Archives/2010/May

ORT
With respect to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohio_River_Trail_Council

The Beaver County Times reference links are not functioning. I have links to these articles at the following locations if you feel it is beneficial to update.

Plans coming together for Ohio River Trail By: Michael Pound Beaver County Times

http://www.ohiorivertrail.org/attachments/062_Plans%20coming%20together%20for%20Ohio%20River%20Trail.pdf

Trail-building effort picks up steam By: Michael Pound Beaver County Times

http://www.ohiorivertrail.org/attachments/062_Beaver%20County%20Times_ Trail-building%20effort%20picks%20up%20steam.pdf

Biking, busing and buddying-up: Fewer commuters go it alone By: Michael Pound Beaver County Times Sunday October 18, 2009 11:00 PM

http://www.ohiorivertrail.org/attachments/062_Biking,%20busing%20and%20buddying-up_Fewer%20commuters%20go%20it%20alone.pdf

Thanks

Troiaeye (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:19, 3 May 2010 (UTC).


 * I've re-linked the first and third references accordingly, but the second link you provided doesn't work, even when I remove the gap in the URL. Could you re-check the filename, and if possible, rename them, replacing any spaces with underscores or hyphens? The renaming isn't strictly necessary, but in the interests of web-friendly links, it would be preferable. Thanks! KaySL (talk) 16:52, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

corrected link: http://www.ohiorivertrail.org/attachments/062_Trail_building%20effort%20picks%20up%20steam.pdf

Troiaeye (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 01:08, 4 May 2010 (UTC).

Here is a new article about the Ohio River Trail: http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/10126/1055757-57.stm

Troiaeye (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 11:32, 7 May 2010 (UTC).


 * Reference added. I forgot to notify you several days ago that I also updated the other, PDF reference with the corrected URL too. KaySL (talk) 14:52, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Wholesale Application Community
Hi, I modified and expanded the text in this article. Let me know if there are still problems with it. Best regards, Jean-Pierre —Preceding unsigned comment added by JPLeRouzic (talk • contribs) 17:27, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi there. The article still requires a fair bit of work, preferably so that it's not so much a paraphrasing of the original source, plus it needs to conform to the general Wikipedia article layout. I'm going to give it a rewrite either today or tomorrow, though, so if you hold off on any edits to it until then, I think we can make it work as an article! KaySL (talk) 18:00, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much! So I stop editing it until a few days. I look forward for the result :-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by JPLeRouzic (talk • contribs) 19:26, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. I've completed the rewrite for now; I've temporarily hidden most of the external links, as they need to be properly cited in the article proper, which I will get around to doing soon, probably in the next day or two . I did remove a few pieces of content however, the image included, as it doesn't technically belong in a Wikipedia article on the platform. KaySL (talk) 21:01, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Many thanks for the hard work at editing! It seems to be a wonderful article right now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JPLeRouzic (talk • contribs) 07:31, 10 May 2010 (UTC)