User talk:Vanished User jdksfajlasd/Archive 2010 /9

re Long Island Tigers
You removed your comment, but anyway: if a speedy-delete nomination is contested by anyone with a reasonably logical argument, my inclination is to remove the tag. It should go to WP:AFD in my view. Herostratus (talk) 18:19, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Hello i removed my vote figuring it shows were i stand on placing the AFD in the first place i was also told that i wasn't able to vote on a AFD i created.-- Staffwaterboy Critique Meundefined ]] 21:53, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

photos
i don't know if it meets the guidelines. how do i make sure it is right.. or how do i find a picture that does meet the guideline? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Phinfan (talk • contribs) 03:55, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Jason Orange
Please stop reverting the edits I am making as this constitutes edit warring and vandalism. I am removing an unwarranted "discography" section that was added by an over-zealous fan. The discogaphy has only ONE single which was a charity record on which Jason Orange appeared (along with a hundred other people). Jason Orange is a member of a the band Take That and does not have a solo discography of his own. 88.104.30.28 (talk) 05:45, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Re: Jeremy Childs (Internet Personality)
You were pretty much on the mark. The thing is, to avoid speedy deletion, an article merely has to assert that its subject is notable, which this one does. However, it's still pretty much a given that it isn't, so I've nominated it for proposed deletion, as you can see on the page now. Another alternative for articles where it's more likely people will want to discuss the deletion nomination is Articles for Deletion, but this one seems so unlikely to stand up that I figure just PROD should be enough. I hope that helps clarify! - Vianello (Talk) 07:06, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Big Red Header?
I get a big read header telling me to stop and use your talkpage when I post here - but this is your talkpage! - Shouldn't this template be on your user page only? Exxolon (talk) 11:01, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Beneva Flowers
Hello, I am user DaveOMac and created the Beneva Flowers page and would like to know how I can fix the page so that it is not labeled for deletion. I am trying to start writing more about companies in Sarasota and Beneva is considered a topflorists in the nation and serves a similar role to florists across the country as ftd and telefora by providing products and print. I thought this made them significant enough for a wiki article. Please let me know if more sources are needed or if there are changes that need to be made. I was not trying to promote and only listed accomplishments that had articles backing them up. Please help me work this out. Much appreciation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DaveOMac (talk • contribs) 15:46, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

about a couple of requests at ACC from last night while i was sleeping...
Regarding ACC request 52035 You created an account that is a perfect match to a name on ARWT with more that 0 edits and that is also similar to an account on URWP with more than 900 edits. I saw you comment afterward in irc to Hersfold about overriding the anti-spoof. You made no comments on the request itself to explain your actions and what you said in irc is rather more a summary of actions than reason for taking the actions. Per Stwalkerster's zero tolerance notice from 29 April 2010  (there is a link in the tool site notice) i am suspending your account as there were 2 reasons to decline that request but you didn't and you didn't explain why you approved it either.

Also, request 52039 should have been a simple "drop" with a comment along the line of, "user self created before i was able to get to this request" but you closed it as "too similar". That sent an email to the new user saying that their requested user name was already in use and that they have to pick something else. Combining the email you sent with the one saying that the account was successfully created will either confuse the new user, make it look like Wikipedia doesn't know what it is doing, or both. If you accidentally close a request incorrectly in a manner that generates an email to the new user it is best to send a quick customised email apologising for the incorrect email and stating the correct status of their request.

Your contributions have been appreciated. This is more to ensure that any misunderstandings or confusions can be resolved before going forward. If you would like to address these matters find myself or another ACC admin on irc, the mailing list, or our respective WP talk pages. delirious &amp;  lost  ☯ ~hugs~ 12:45, 3 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Your ACC account was unsuspended earlier today. I really should have left this note a few hours ago. Please do make sure you read the guide and review all of the checks on requests. If you need help with anything try to be as specific as you can so that whomever helps you can be of the most help that they can be. If you want to go over things in detail email me or PM me on irc. delirious  &amp;  lost  ☯ ~hugs~ 23:09, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

ANI Notification
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. See Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents. Exxolon (talk) 10:59, 3 September 2010 (UTC)


 * I agree with the comments that have been left on ANI regarding your overenthusiatic tool use. While tools make editors more productive, users must be especially careful not to misuse them. As such, I would strongly recommend that you reevaluate your use of automated tools for a while, because I think several editors are presently concerned that you're being too hasty and they may be withdrawn if other instances of inappropriate use pop up in future. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) - talk 11:59, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Art Mills
Try not to be so quick in requesting speedy deletion of new articles! Kneale (talk) 22:03, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Right- Sorry about that -- Staffwaterboy Critique Me  22:04, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

No worries :-) Kneale (talk) 22:06, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

The additional comments on Cornelius Sim were highly accurate to date, including his quotes from the sermons because I was there is the audience. I was there at the welcome mass for Lajolo where he made the comments of what happened at the Foreign Ministry. Pictures were shown next day in the local papers of the priests in their full uniform. Nothing was personally libelous. I feel Wikipedia is highly sensitive.I have just brought it up to date and wrote most of the page anyway. Since I wrote most of it, why then would I seek to vandalise the page. Its outrageous to say that! Let it all appear and let the bishop decide how and what to edit. After all he is a xomputer expert. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.6.245.189 (talk) 04:46, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Cornelius Sim:- what i am doing is not wrong. I am from Brunei. I am here in Brunei explaining to the world about Brunei people who are poorly known internationally. I am convinced of this. So why do you censor my words? Are you the self appointed world censor? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.6.245.189 (talk) 04:50, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion converted to PROD: Javier Ybarra Bergé
Hello Staffwaterboy. I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on Javier Ybarra Bergé to a proposed deletion tag, because I do not believe CSD applies to the page in question. Thank you. Kimchi.sg (talk) 05:51, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Addiction psychiatry
Hello, I've reverted the db-nocontext on Addiction psychiatry, as I think it now sets out sufficient context for inclusion. Thanks, Nanodance (talk) 08:12, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

RE: Binesi Morrisseau nomination.
O.K.

just wondering why you keep on tagging the website Binesi Jason Morrisseau for deletion. This is my first time on here, or creating anything of the sort, and no, it was my roommate that was trying to remove your notices. We are an community based household and all share the same computer. Anywa, is there anyway to salvage this, or to make it work? You probably dont know, but this guy is a hero to many people here in Canada.

(Indigenousfreethinker (talk) 08:42, 7 September 2010 (UTC))

Blanked
This section has been blanked as a courtesy.--  Forty two  10:56, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Your recent UAA reports
Thank you for your report at Usernames for administrator attention (UAA). However, your report was removed as UAA is for name policy infringements that are serious enough to warrant an immediate block. General name policy violations should first be discussed with the user on their talk page. A helpful template to do just that is. Note that a request for comment can be filed if the user disagrees that their name is against the username policy, or has continued to edit after you have expressed your concern. You may find the UAA instructions helpful, and I'd recommend reading them over prior to making future reports to UAA. Thank you.  Giftiger Wunsch   [TALK]  12:39, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note that using one's own name as a username is not a violation of policy; if they are spamming, warn them and then file a report with WP:AIV if it persists past a final warning. Thanks.  Giftiger Wunsch   [TALK]  12:38, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

keep an eye open
Sometimes sensitive personal information gets added to an article inappropriately, like phone numbers. Please watch out for this, and discretely notify OVERSIGHT if you find it during newpage or recent changes patrol, as it may need to be suppressed under the privacy policy. (mentioning this because an article you recently tagged for CSD had a phone number in it) Triona (talk) 06:58, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

All right will do thank you for the heads up -- Staffwaterboy Critique Me  07:07, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Samacheer kalvi
Hello Staffwaterboy. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Samacheer kalvi, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not blatantly vandalism or a hoax. Thank you. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  09:44, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Birendra Narayan Chakraborty
Hello Staffwaterboy. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Birendra Narayan Chakraborty, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: being the governor of a state is a valid assertion of importance to pass A7, it obviously passes WP:Politician. Thank you. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  10:02, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

I'd rather Transcribe with a quill
Sir this site is too complicated for what we have been ordered to archive, and the ammount of time we have been given to archive it. I'd rather be using a pen and paper, it would be easier that way. Besides, much of the information on this site is not true or is obscured. Or it is simply ripped to pieces by admin like you. If you can rip an article to peices, can you rip my user account to peices? Gibberishflyboy (talk) 14:44, 8 September 2010 (UTC)