User talk:Vanished User jdksfajlasd/Archive 2011 /2

Welcome to the LGBT Studies WikiProject!
-- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 06:17, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Yes Sorry about that Igoo fell behind the latest correction. If you may can you please remove the warning thanks . Staffwaterboy Critique Me 19:28, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Rucka rucka ali edits
You removed some edits that i made to Rucka Rucka Ali's page. I am guessing that this is due to some of the language used in the titles of the songs. i did not name the songs, however, they are real songs and you are free to look all of them up on iTunes. I personally work with Mr Ali and was adding information by his instructions. please re-instate my edits so we can have an accurate wiki page for Mr Ali. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Firehurtsrealbad (talk • contribs) 20:33, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Hello i have reverted the edits that were made you can see them here. Sorry about that. Staffwaterboy Critique Me 20:36, 4 February 2011 (UTC) thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Firehurtsrealbad (talk • contribs) 20:39, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Your AN/V report
Could you elaborate on your report at WP:AN/V please? Recent edits by the reported IP appeared to be resolving redlinks. Thank you. -- Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 02:25, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Please disregard, i just reviewed it and their is no vandlasim this was done in error, --  Staffwaterboy Critique Me  02:31, 9 February 2011 (UTC)


 * No problem. I was just taking another look and earlier edits were questionable, but that might have been a different user on the same IP - possibly a university IP.  Thanks for your work.  --  Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 02:35, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Hi staffwaterboy
My latest post of the new asus line of pc is the current version that is available in the shops. since wiki is the most up to date encyclopedia covering all areas i feel that a post on such a trendy new inovation by asus would not be out of place. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ayorfolorunso (talk • contribs) 16:33, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Hello please take a look here for witting new articles wp:new, the problem is that it seems more or less copy and pasted in to Wikipedia rather then taking the time to make it meet wp:n.I hope that can help some if you have anymore questions please feel free, Staffwaterboy Critique Me 16:38, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Altered speedy deletion rationale: Asus NX90JQ-A1
Hello Staffwaterboy. I am just letting you know that I deleted Asus NX90JQ-A1, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 17:05, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

The "sockpuppet investigation"
Hey! Excuse me but can you please help me where to respond concerning the SPI? I need someone's help with this. Tamara Zion (talk) 07:29, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Help! Please! Where do I respond? Tamara Zion (talk) 07:26, 10 February 2011 (UTC) Hello you can respond here Sockpuppet_investigations/Perfect_with_a_PURR to the Wp:Spi investigation. Staffwaterboy Critique Me 07:32, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion converted to PROD: Visible Bra Straps
Hello Staffwaterboy. I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on Visible Bra Straps to a proposed deletion tag, because I do not believe CSD applies to the page in question - A7 does not apply to films. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 10:53, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Rollback of Golden Team entry
Hi there, sorry to bother you, but I am a bit concerned about the current state of the Golden Team entry. I made several edits to the original article to remove what I thought to be verbosity and peacock phrasing. I have received Talk entries from a user called GrandMariner stating that my edits were vandalism, and that they intended to revert all of my edits. A user has now logged in and reverted my changes back to the original verbosity - these in turn were rolled back by yourself :)

I really don't want this to turn into some edit-rollback-edit-rollback war - can you please advise how this could be resolved? Thanks!

I just rolled it back because the lack of edit summary now i understand why it was done thats all. Staffwaterboy Critique Me  14:56, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Backtrack desktop.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Backtrack desktop.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- / ƒETCH COMMS  /  18:59, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:03, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Your RFA
Hi Staffwaterboy. Would you consider opting in to X!'s Edit Counter so that RfA participants can get a better idea of your areas of focus? Thanks, 28bytes (talk) 06:44, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your message i have now opted in for the tool server. Cheers Staffwaterboy Critique Me  06:46, 13 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks! And good luck! 28bytes (talk) 06:47, 13 February 2011 (UTC)


 * If you do intend to become an admin someday I would recommend two things:
 * Become a stable editor. At least a few of the opposes were based specifically on your "on again, off again" editing pattern.  While everyone has other things to do in life besides Wikipedia, it does help instill confidence to see that you're making a commitment with the intent to be around here when someone needs you as an administrator.
 * Seek others' advice when about to do something you're unsure of. I don't mean you should be asking for help with every little thing, or else no one will trust you with admin tools anyway, but you should be able to tell the difference between situations you're ready to handle and those you're not, and be willing to learn how to handle situations that are new to you.   ♥  Soap  ♥  01:58, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm more concerned with the sloppy spelling and grammar than that activity levels. Your user page says you're attending college, Staffwaterboy; are you a native English speaker? If so, surely you could try a little harder to read over your sentences before saving them ... / ƒETCH COMMS  /  03:36, 15 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Good advice from Soap. The two largest concerns were grammar/capitalization and activity level. Just become active for a few months before going through another RfA. There goes the stability concerns. Just put forth more effort to be grammatically correct in your typing. Simply capitalizing your "I"s would help a great deal because it's the most obvious error you make. All in all, you should be heartened that most of the opposes were over simple issues and for the most part didn't express concern in your overall competence. Just work on the main concerns raised by the opposers and I have no doubt you'll become an admin.  Swarm   X 06:32, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for the advice I will take that it consideration when making my edits here on Wikipedia. It seems that usually I find myself rushing to type a sentence and fail to overlook any spelling or grammatical errors made on my part.

Staffwaterboy Critique Me 22:15, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 * You don't fail to overlook errors, you do overlook them. To overlook means to ignore, disregard, fail to notice, etc. / ƒETCH COMMS  /  03:28, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Editor review
Hello, this is just to let you know that your editor review has been completed, several editors have provided their feedback on your editor review page. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Happy editing and regards, —UncleDouggie (talk) 06:55, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

CSD Tagging
Hey, don't forget to notify users when you tag their articles with CSD. I noticed when you're not using TW that

you missed three users. Thanks!--v/r - TP 14:35, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Will do,WP:TW is not currently work on this computer at school for one reason or another but.I will be sure to notfiy user as well. Staffwaterboy Critique Me 14:39, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

A7 speedy deletion denied
Hi Staffwaterboy. Thank you for your work on patrolling pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I just wanted to inform you that I declined to delete James Blackmon, Sr., a page that you tagged for speedy deletion because of the following concern: the criterion you used does not cover this kind of page or the reason you specified is not a valid reason for speedy deletion. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion and especially what is considered non-criteria. In future you should rather tag such pages for proposed deletion or start an appropriate deletion discussion. feydey (talk) 09:11, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

csd rationale
I declined the speedy of Mark T. Maybury; while the article need a lot of work, chief scientist of the USAF is a credible assertion of importance in my view.--  SPhilbrick  T  22:18, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:07, 28 February 2011 (UTC)