User talk:Vanished user 24kwjf10h32h/Archive January 27 2008 - January 31 2008

Speedy deletion of Tio1.jpg
A tag has been placed on Tio1.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Marlith  (Talk)   23:49, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Tio1.jpg
A tag has been placed on Tio1.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Basketball one ten  23:49, 27 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi MisterWiki - you wrote: This is an important article, see all the links who have Tio1.jpg in the wiki of Inciclopedia, appears in 200.000 pages and why are not important.


 * Perhaps it would have been wise to make some claims to importance and notability in the article, then. As it was, there was nothing to indicate that the article was on a notable subject whatsoever, and even if it is linked in the way you state, then there is still little reason to suggest that Tio1.jpg is notable. It could, for instance, be claimed that the "open book" motif used as a background on Wikipedia's pages is part of millions of web pages, but that doesn't necessarily make it a worthwhile subject for an article. If you can show independent (non-Inciclopedia) sources showing the notability of the image, then it may bee worth considering an article on the subject. as it is, though, its notability is questionable at best, and non-existent outside Inciclopedia at worst. Grutness...wha?  00:09, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Wena Naty (video)
A tag has been placed on Wena Naty (video), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dougie WII (talk) 03:18, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Mind if I...
Use the Profanity.svg image for the "this person uses profanity...." userbox? Thanks in advance. -iaNLOPEZ1115 TaLKBaCK Vandalize it UBX 11:33, 29 January 2008 (UTC)