User talk:Vanished user 4173638/Archive1

Flute Quartet Article
Please leave any information about the flute quartet article for me here. Thanks! Rocket71048576 18:19, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Yo. Um, to be honest, I've never played in a flute quartet and I wasn't sure that such a thing was necessary until I popped it into google and saw a couple of groups. I would assume that there are only a few pieces or so that were actually written specifically for a flute quartet as opposed to a string quartets or even violin quartets. There are, however, plenty of pieces out there thought that have been arranged for four flutes to play together. I can imagine though that these might sound pretty shrill without much of a bass register, unless you wrote for an actual bass flute - although they are kinda unweildy and large. Sorry I can't be much more help. I suppose you could mention a few of the groups that advertise themselves on the internet; but it would make the article sound a bit like an advert and who's to say that those groups are worthy of inclusion on wikipedia? They might be, they might not be... --Luccent 14:46, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

I saw one once. It was nice.

And there is my awesome contribution :] LonelyPker 05:10, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 2nd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:37, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 8th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:01, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 15th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:05, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 19:47, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Sig timestamp
helpme I've created a new sig at [] and would like to know how to add a timestamp to it. Thanks, Rocket71048576 10:53, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
 * You don't need to add a timestamp there. Go to preferences, check on the raw signature tab, and put as the text and voila! When you use the four tildes the timestamp will appear automatically (remember ~ ). Feel free to use the helpme template again, in case you need help! Cheers! &mdash;  Nearly Headless Nick  11:08, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 22nd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:43, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Mildred Robbins Leet
The article makes several assertions to notability, so lets give the article a bit of time to gain those references. - CobaltBlueTony 18:07, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I realised that when I'd read it properly, so I took the db-bio tag off. Ro ck et 71 0 4 8 5 7 6  ∞T al k 07:24, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the welcome...  I may very well be interested in the Blackadder Project...  could you tell me a little more about it when you get a chance?

Thank You.

S. Baldrick 20:34, 24 January 2007 (UTC) (S. Baldrick)

The Jesus Freak Hideout Article
Look, I have had to deal with the speedy deletion stuff before, and no offense, but I think the site could be more helpful in this matter. I made the article, but I was no where done explaining what the site really is before the speedy deletion notice came it. It is a very popular Christian rock site that provides some of the best news on the genre on the internet. Would that help? I'm just tired of seeing it's name all over Wikipedia with a red link because there is no page for it. Sorry if I seem rude, but I really didn't get the chance to explain it better.RoryS89 16:29, 27 January 2007 (UTC)RoryS89
 * I have started an article for it that will be well-sourced and will demonstrate its notability. It is currently in my sandbox. WikiProject CCM member Royal<b style="color:#FFCC00;">broil</b>T : C 14:21, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Rocket71048576! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Prodego <sup style="color:darkgreen;">talk  03:06, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

I havent vandalised anything
Hi there, I havent vandalised anything, I reverted an edit wich remvoed info from wikipedia but I have not vandalised anything, please tell further details. <font color="#0066FF">Telly <font color="#66ff33">addict  18:07, 28 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Please expalin to me on my talk page why you took the vandalism template away and why you put it there in the first place? I forgive you if it was accidental but I just need to know the details.


 * Dont worry about it, I did the same thing and had to remove the content of a user talk page and tell them it was an accident. Dont let this put you off and enjoy using Vandal proof!!!! <font color="#0066FF">Telly <font color="#66ff33">addict  18:13, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 29th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 18:37, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Your signature
Could I ask you to reduce the length of your signature, it's a bit too long. → Aza Toth 14:59, 3 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Better? Rocket7<font color="#FF0000">1 <font color="#FFCC00">0 <font color="#00CC00">4 <font color="#00CC99">8 <font color="#6666FF">5 <font color="#9933FF">7 <font color="#FF00FF">6 ∞Talk 15:08, 3 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Rather better, but you can reduce it some character more, like this: Rocket7<font color="#f00">1 <font color="#fc0">0 <font color="#0c0">4 <font color="#0c9">8 <font color="#66f">5 <font color="#93f">7 <font color="#f0f">6 ∞Talk, thou I would suggest reducing the number of colors even more, max two or three. → Aza Toth 15:50, 3 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Now? Rocket7<font color="#FFCC00">1048576∞<font color="#FF0000">Talk 16:19, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The length is good now, but perhaps the yellow is a bit too bright? → Aza Toth 16:50, 3 February 2007 (UTC)


 * OK, I think it's alright now. Thanks for your help, I really appreciate it. Rocket7<font color="#009933">1048576∞<font color="#006FB0">Talk 17:01, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

rosanna jönis
why did you put a tag on rosanna jönis? and i want a really good explanation, do you knwo who she is? Are you from sweden?/matrix17

No, I'm not from Sweden but I put a tag on the article because I didn't think it was notable enough. If you have a problem with this, you might be better off adding the hangon tag to the top of her page. Rocket7<font color="#FF0000">1 <font color="#FFCC00">0 <font color="#00CC00">4 <font color="#00CC99">8 <font color="#6666FF">5 <font color="#9933FF">7 <font color="#FF00FF">6 ∞Talk 15:19, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

ok your powerhungry person continue do that/matrix17

Signpost updated for February 5th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:25, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Location Maps
On the WikiProject Countries talk page, you had either explictly declared a general interest in the project, or had participated at a discussion that appears related to Location Maps for European countries. New maps had been created by David Liuzzo, and are available for the countries of the European continent, and for countries of the European Union exist in two versions. From November 16, 2006 till January 31, 2007, a poll had tried to find a consensus for usage of 'old' or of which and where 'new' version maps. At its closing, 25 people had spoken in favor of either of the two presented usages of new versions but neither version had reached a consensus (12 and 13), and 18 had preferred old maps. As this outcome cannot justify reverting of new maps that had become used for some countries, seconds before February 5, 2007 a survey started that will be closed at February 20, 2007 23:59:59. It should establish whether the new style maps may be applied as soon as some might become available for countries outside the European continent (or such to depend on future discussions), and also which new version should be applied for which countries. Please note that since January 1, 2007 all new maps became updated by David Liuzzo (including a world locator, enlarged cut-out for small countries) and as of February 4, 2007 the restricted licence that had jeopardized their availability on Wikimedia Commons, became more free. The subsections on the talk page that had shown David Liuzzo's original maps, now show his most recent design. Please read the discussion (also in other sections α, β, γ, δ, ε, ζ, η, θ) and in particular the arguments offered by the forementioned poll, while realizing some comments to have been made prior to updating the maps, and all prior to modifying the licences, before carefully reading the '''presentation of the currently open survey. You are invited''' to only then finally make up your mind and vote for only one option. There mustnot be 'oppose' votes; if none of the options would be appreciated, you could vote for the option you might with some effort find least difficult to live with - rather like elections only allowing to vote for one of several candidates. Obviously, you are most welcome to leave a brief argumentation with your vote. Kind regards. — SomeHuman 7 Feb2007 20:34 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 12th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:31, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Edits to haplotype and vandalism
Thanks for your work reverting vandals, but I'm wondering if the case with haplotype is more complicated than meets the eye. One of the edits appears to be contributing information, albeit content that existed elsewhere in wikipedia. You can see my comment at User_talk:128.231.88.4. Thanks, Andjam 03:40, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 19th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:31, 20 February 2007 (UTC)