User talk:Vanished user 4556414564028974/Archive 1

Welcome!
Hello, Tornadosurvivor2011, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Atlantic306 (talk) 16:18, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

J Bradley Creed
Hi, unfortunately wikis are not a reliable source for wikipedia because they are user generated, so can you please add references to WP:Reliable sources, and adapt the content accordingly, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 16:21, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Please take note of WP:PROF
It notes how we will not consider local university academics notable and, at best, only if they are significantly know in either career or peers. Because there are no signs of notability, it's best listed at the school article. SwisterTwister  talk  02:01, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ReceiptHog


A tag has been placed on ReceiptHog, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 00:52, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

North Carolina Connections Academy moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, North Carolina Connections Academy, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dom from Paris (talk) 13:23, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:ConnectionsAcad.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:ConnectionsAcad.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Image source problem with File:FaviconChzl.png
Thank you for uploading File:FaviconChzl.png.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:04, 5 December 2018 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ron h jones (Talk) 18:04, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:FaviconChzl.png
Thanks for uploading File:FaviconChzl.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:15, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

RFA page
Hi, Tornadosurvivor2011. I see you created Requests for adminship/Tornadosurvivor2011. As you may have already discovered, editors cannot submit nominations to WP:RFA until their accounts achieve extended confirmed status. Even then, it is unlikely that a relatively inexperienced editor would be approved for adminship. I encourage you to read the advice given at pages such as Adminship is not for new users and Advice for RfA candidates before going any further. If you have already changed your mind and do not want to pursue adminship right now, I would be happy to delete the incomplete nomination page so you can start fresh when the time is right. --RL0919 (talk) 17:32, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I see from your RfA that you want to get more involved with fighting vandals. As it happens, you don't need the admin tools to make a big difference. If you haven't already, you can install Twinkle, which provides a suite of tools for dealing with vandals and problem users. To make best use of it, you can join the Recent changes patrol. After some experience in this area, you can request the Rollbacker user right and gain access to Huggle, which is even more powerful for vandal fighting. Just to note, both these tools have integrated capability for reporting of vandals to WP:AIV. &#x2230; Bellezzasolo &#x2721;   Discuss  19:16, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Per the above comments, I've deleted this. If you want it back, let me know, but I really think it would be best for you to wait until you have a more substantial record on the project before going for RfA. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:30, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:North Carolina Connections Academy


Hello, Tornadosurvivor2011. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "North Carolina Connections Academy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Cpt Viraj  (Talk) 02:23, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Your signature
Please update your signature to comply with WP:SIG; it needs to contain a link to your user talk page and/or your userpage. Thanks. Home Lander (talk) 02:58, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Sbubby for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sbubby is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sbubby until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &#x222F; WBG converse 16:08, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Please read
WP:AADD. &#x222F; WBG converse 15:41, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Sorry sir about starting an argument, I thought it was a vandal who did this. My bad! Bryce M (talk) 15:43, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I am inclined to think that you are quite young and may not be yet competent enough to edit this project. My message was meant as a reply to your !vote at Articles for deletion/Brian Steel (2nd nomination); not as a reply to your reversions of SD001 (which I had already roll-backed). Also, redact ain't a precise synonym of edit; we use the former term when the intention is to censure or obfuscate some detail, (which was earlier present). Further, your articles will be subjected to rigorous scrutiny, once you submit them to the project; this is a serious project, with an encyclopedic outlook. &#x222F; WBG converse 16:15, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
 * My apologies sir, I didn't know that the mainspaces should not be reverted. Bryce M (talk) 17:25, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sbubby Logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sbubby Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Begoon 00:29, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:WinterStorm20181206.jpg


The file File:WinterStorm20181206.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused, uploaded for >6mo"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 00:26, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

January 2020
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to User talk:Serols—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 16:03, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that User:Serols, I accidently thought you did the wrong edit. My bad. Bryce M (talk) 16:28, 4 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello Tornadosurvivor2011, then you have to remove your warnings if you already notice your mistakes. --Serols (talk) 16:33, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Ok, I will try to do that next time. My bad that I forgot to revert that change. Bryce M (talk) 16:35, 4 January 2020 (UTC)