User talk:Vanished user 456745753784/Archive 2

Logo
We are holding a competition,a LOGO competition on CCW.Join in NOW!--Father Tan 13:19, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

Prussian Blue
Some of your edits are being altered on the AfD page on this neo-nazi band. Your initial comments were struck through and your vote removed. I left a comment to this effect on the AfD page. Happy edits. &mdash;Gaff| ταλκ 22:57, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

Just so you know, the page has not been unprotected. The reason that I'm able to edit it is that I'm an administrator. DS 13:31, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

Are you talking about me or someone else? I dont think that saying I would fuck Lynx qualifies as "hate speech." Its more like "love speech to me. You'd probably fuck her too (in the ass even? -- Nazi chicks are into that sort of thing ya know)Purpleavenger 06:25, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

Revolutionary Army
Comrade Compatriot,

I have been wondering what happened to the National Revolutionary Army. Was it renamed? When did this happen? The National Revolutionary Army article doesn't say anything, and we couldn't answer at Talk:National Revolutionary Army. Do you know? Does the zh version say anything? I'm too illiterate to tell. --Jiang 06:30, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

Nanking Massacre
Removing eyewitnesses accounts? Like? You might have been mistaken.Mandel 07:07, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The Minnie Vautrin quote I shorten because the section is specifically on rape. The rest isn't about rape.  I might move sections of it to "theft and arson", but maybe we can find a more suitable quote.
 * As for the second, I don't think whether the boy lives or not is important. Mandel 07:21, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Ellipses have already been used, if you look carefully. :) Mandel 07:29, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I've been involved in a protracted and rather heated argument at Talk:William Shakespeare and I don't think I can keep track of the Nanking Massacre page for some time. Anyway, after that blows over I'll take another long vocation from Wikipedia, so the Nanking page...I don't think I have either the expertise or the time to improve on the article, which certainly does need more help.  Maybe one can stick an attention tag on it. Mandel 15:46, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * If you are agreeable to a revote get one more person to endorse my proposal at Nanking Massacre talk page. Then let me know at my talk page.  I've already planned the voting procedures so that conflicts wouldn't occur. Mandel 14:07, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

1937-1945 war
You seem to know lots about the war which is great. I think we should make a section in the article that is just about the progress of the war, like from the start of the war, and just run through the major engagements and end with the atomic bombing. I don't think the article gives a very good description of anything relating to battles, territorial changes, strategic appraisal and so forth. Most of the stuff seems to focus on background, KMT-CCP conflict, and KMT-allies conflict, instead of the "big picture".149.142.103.63 01:13, 11 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Copied from your talkpage in case you don't see that.
 * I agree 100%. However, I think it'd be best if we actually have all the articles for all the major battles before we assemble them. As you can probably see from Template:Campaignbox Second Sino-Japanese War, a good deal of the famous and major battles are still in red. Personally, I will try to finish these, or at least give all of them a battlebox and such, before I attempt to make significant modifications/additions to the article on the war itself. Of course, you should feel free to contribute to the article yourself... * hint hint! :D * -- Миборовский U 01:39, 11 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Hello, do you know any books on the subject? I have Osprey Publishing's The Chinese Army 1937-1949 which as extensive info on army structure and equipment, and a nice timeline listing major battles (with an over-emphasis on British burma, i might add) that the article sorely needs. It doesn't really have anything substantial detaling the major engagements though. 149.142.103.63 18:07, 14 November 2005 (UTC)


 * It'd be great if I could get my hands on that book, but alas I am short on cash and I don't particular like the cover... (:D read my review on the link above). It'd be awesome if you could adapt what the book has into wikipedia. (Don't plagiarise, though, because that's not cool.) On a related note, I think I'll get the book as soon as I can, probably with the Heroes of the Soviet Union and/or German commanders books. :) Unfortunately I'm quite busy nowadays and likely will be until May 2006 excepting holidays and vacations and breaks, so don't expect too much from me in that regard. Thanks. -- Миборовский U 23:19, 14 November 2005 (UTC)


 * LOL, I didn't realize the cover isn't too flattering, but the short summary on the back of the book is pretty accurate at least. BlueShirts 23:51, 15 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Indeed, which is why I gave it a 4/5. :D Miborovsky 00:01, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

regarding your late beloved leader
There's a debate that is historical in nature and I am trying to solicit more input. Your comments/support/opposition are welcome at Featured article removal candidates/Sun Yat-sen. And what is "pre-1911 ROC loyalist" supposed to mean? There was no ROC pre-1911. --Jiang 00:29, 16 November 2005 (UTC)


 * do you mean pre-1920s ROC? Sun's ideologies got trampled pretty much after Chiang came to power. BlueShirts 01:45, 16 November 2005 (UTC)


 * See Jiang's talkpage for my answer. And no, Sun's ideology got trampled on 10 October, 1911.
 * -- Миборовский U 01:46, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
 * lol now I remembered that Sun never really got a chance to become a true president. Too bad he hadnt got an army, otherwise he wouldnt have to align with yuan and all those crappy people. BlueShirts 02:05, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
 * 'Tis true, though it's my belief that if he had an army his former ideology would be massacred even sooner. Power corrupts.
 * -- Миборовский U 02:09, 16 November 2005 (UTC)


 * nevermind the request. the article got demoted already. but now we need to improve it and get it repromoted.--Jiang 08:40, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

blueshirts
there's a pretty long article on Blue Shirts Society. I haven't read over it but it looks comprehensive, needs a little cleanup.BlueShirts 21:27, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

pictures
hello, where do you find pictures of the sino-japanese war online? I can't really find any pictures so I have been scanning this book "Pictorial Records of China''s War of Resistance Against Japan" I got from the library. It's around like 1000 pages thick and I've scanned like almost half of it. I'll probably resume during winter break BlueShirts 21:41, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

Helllo,Rfa
Hello,Mib.I've seen you experience and your edits and yes,you're one tough guy.Will you accept my Rfa nomination?--Tan Ding Xiang 陈鼎翔 02:36, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

Ok then,here yougo!Btw,were you from Mrs. Sandiran's class?She went to Montfort Junior this year.--Tan Ding Xiang 陈鼎翔 02:52, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

Here it is on the RFA page.I've nominated you.

eight hundred heroes
hiya, can anybody also edit the page? It's got this notice on it. Anyway, I might add something about the last surviving veteran of the battle, who pretty much got mistreated by the ccp and languished his life away in Chongqing. I'll do that on weekends since the school PC i use doesnt have chinese installed and all my stuff is back home. BlueShirts 20:32, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

Adminship swimming!
Goody!Bro,your Rfa's good!Rock on!--Tan Ding Xiang 陈鼎翔 03:02, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

special pages
hello, how do I make more pages to the user page? Thanks. BlueShirts 08:53, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

hi, I got the list from here BlueShirts 04:25, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

忻口會戰 is a part of Battle of Taiyuan and Pingxingguan. I think the order goes like this: Pingxingguan, 忻口, then Taiyuan. The website is the ROC military history museum, so I think it's pretty reliable, but I think we need to dig out more books on it. The Chinese article got three paragraphs on the united front, which is okay. But then it got interspersed with passages about communist guerilla warfare like they were some major threat. Anyway, I probably won't edit on the chinese pages since my chinese typing speed is too damn slow :( I was pretty surprised that more than half of chinese discussion was about how the name the article, and not much on content. BlueShirts 05:59, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

Adminship
I have promoted you to adminship. Congradulations. Please familiarize yourself with the relavant policies before using those shiny new buttons. Raul654 05:47, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Congrats !  NSLE  ( 讨论 + extra ) 06:44, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Uh, on your thanks messages to us, you linked to Ianblair's RfA instead of your own. NSLE  ( 讨论 + extra ) 09:37, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Totally my bad. I feel very guilty now. :( -- Миборовский U 10:23, 25 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Congratulations, and you're very welcome! --Merovingian 07:06, 25 November 2005 (UTC)


 * hiya Miborovsky, congrats! Can you ban people now? lol. Anyway, there's some dude who keeps on messing up Chinese nationalism and violating the 3-revert rule. It'd be great if the page is protected or something, nice start as an admin eh? :) BlueShirts 08:16, 25 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Congratulations! Mark1 17:40, 26 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Congrats, happy editing! (and blocking, protecting, and deleting (all in moderation though))

Johann Wolfgang 00:22, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

Drug-free
Hi there Miborovsky, Im Moe Epsilon. I saw your name to the list of drug-free Wikipedians. I created a template and category for it at Template:Drug-free. You can add it to your babel if you want. Hope you use it! — M o e   ε  23:39, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

thanks for the encouragement! BlueShirts 09:03, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

Overthrowing the Gongchandang
Despite our different socioeconomic beliefs our stance on political liberty seems the same (I'm -8 eco and -7 pol), and both communo-anarchists and capitalists alike agree that the Gongchandang is a mutual enemy, and Wikipedia has made enemies of the Gongchandang anyway, and it occurs so have you, so I propose we organise a front to [i]openly[/i] rebel against the Gongchandang. On Wikipedia. Yes. What do you say to this?

I can't see how this will probably be of any detriment, while having lots of potential benefit...(Sun Yat Sen himself had to start somewhere, right...?), and seeing how we're spitting in the Gongchandang's face anyway (with our brilliant tips on how to evade Gongchandang censorship)....I see all the reason why you should agree to this.

Oh, sorry I was too late to vote on your RfA - didn't know you had one. Next time one of us SGPedians' get nominated, it should be posted on the Board. ;-) -- Natalinasmpf 01:48, 28 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Just in case any Gestapo-spinoff organisation is monitoring this, NO. -- Миборовский U 23:41, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

wiki commons
that's a nice repository, thanx! BlueShirts 08:27, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

Korean?
I don't read Japanese, so I've no idea what the link was about. Pls enlighten me. Mandel 16:06, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

armor
hello, I probably won't get a chance to edit stuff like i did for great wall and shanghai until christmas, when the university goes on break. I'll try to get some info on chinese industry during the war. lol, the first time I heard Hengyang Industry was from Hearts of Iron II :) BlueShirts 20:07, 30 November 2005 (UTC)


 * no I don't play the game anymore, too time consuming :). I wasnt good at it either, the CCP gave me way too much trouble and my production queue always ran into yellow or red. Not good at the game at all :( BlueShirts 00:24, 1 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Yeah I think there was this mod that changes all the names of generals and provinces to Chinese, but it didn't work with the lastest version though. Might've changed, I don't know. BlueShirts 00:27, 1 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Hello, can you help me with the userbox? How do I get it so it's directly under the ROC flag? If you can it'd be great if you fix it for me, thanks a lot! BlueShirts 02:33, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
 * thanx a lot! I think the chinese army was vastly inferior not only in terms of armament and training, and other things as well, like command structure and really big maps BlueShirts 19:59, 2 December 2005 (UTC)


 * yeah the high command (Chiang Kai-shek) got the war of attrition part right but pretty much refused to let his officers have more control over battle. I think China had problems with training as well, since Chiang's german-trained troops were not that many and got significantly wasted in the early stages. China didn't have a reserve system so they just grabbed whatever people they could and pretty much forced them into enemy lines. BlueShirts 23:06, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

Re : Greetings, Comrade Hou!
Greetings Comrade Miborovsky!

I thought you have actually known this long ago. ;)

Anyway, congrats on your adminship. You should get used to the additional features soon.

Also, regarding the GEP "flamewar" (as one of our participants call it) in the Sketchpad project, don't bother posting anything new. We've actually found out what's going on - it's just some folks from the ACJC GEP Alumni trying to stir up something. Just sit back, watch the fireworks run its course and we'll eventually lock up the thread.

If you need anything in Wikipedia, feel free to let me know on my talkpage. Once again, Greetings!

- Cheers, Mailer Diablo 08:02, 1 December 2005 (UTC) :)

templates
Hello there, I see you're on track to create templates about weapons and stuff. Do you happen to have the osprey book? If not I can send you a pdf file (during christmas), it's a great source. BlueShirts 21:16, 6 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Hiya, I read that you wished to give some gay dude a pink triangle and send him to a concentration camp, lol. Do you want to work on Homosexuality in China? I skimmed over the article and it's a gross exaggeration, in both definitions of the word. I can't believe that the Water Margin novel is even mentioned in the article. Some pov editors put a gay spin onto everything and I think it should be corrected. BlueShirts 03:22, 7 December 2005 (UTC)


 * I know you're not a fag. Just want to see if you want to "de-fag" the article, lol. Man the article is so misleading now, like gay people were big in ancient china, dang. BlueShirts 18:42, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

hey, thanks for correcting the Songshan information
hi, i made the chances to 8, i only notice that i was wrong, cause i got the information from TV adaptation, thanks

Invitation to the Forgotten Realms project
Hi,

We are working on a Forgotten Realms Project to map Toril (mostly Faerûn, at the present). Since you contributed quite a lot on a Forgotten Realms-specific entry, I'd like to invite you to join the project, so we could improve the “Mapping the Realms” project.

The goal is to create a sort of World Factbook for the Realms. This means:
 * A consistent content
 * Use of templates
 * Entries should be limited to “sovereign places”: states and free cities, as well a moderately-inhabited place such as the Western Highlands.

On top of this, we also plan to cover Lost Empires, such as Pelvuria or Imaskar and, of course, Netheril


 * The project is located here
 * The Geographical index of Toril is a good start to get a visual of had been done, as well as the Halruaa entry.

Main contributors are presently
 * David Latapie
 * Poulsen

If you know some other person who would be interested, feel free to forward the invitation!

Feel free to take a look. We hope to see you soon mapping the Realms with us! Reply to David Latapie 13:00, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

Meetup
Meetup/Seattle3 could sure use your comments on location: so far we have no clear consensus. -- Jmabel | Talk 00:05, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

Your pal's on Rfa!
NSLE is on Rfa, buddy!Vote him!Btw,congrats!Tan Ding Xiang 陈鼎翔 04:45, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

User categorisation
You were listed on the Wikipedians in high school page. As part of the User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit Category:Wikipedians in high school for instructions. --Cooksey 19:18, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

drug free wikipedians
hiya miborovsky, the category is in danger of getting deleted, so please vote here, thanks. BlueShirts 01:17, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Nanking Massacre
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. --Nachi 07:03, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * That's just so absurd I'm not even going to reply on your talkpage. Please, find out who is being unproductive. And besides, you should be using instead of , if you read what your friends were writing. -- Миборовский U 07:13, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I've read not only what they -- the people whom you call "my friends" -- were writing but also what you were writing. I know you think that poll is void, but do you think there is no better way than to ignore the result of the poll and repeat rv? --nachi 14:41, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I believe that question is best directed at the people to whom it should be directed at. -- Миборовский U 21:10, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Cultures of the World
Would you consider contributing? Or how about voting for it as collaboration of the week for this new but important article.--Culturesoftheworld 19:29, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

book
Is it missing a page? I have total 51 pages pdf that I downloaded. BlueShirts 22:45, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

re:Category:Wikipedians by D&D Alignment
I noticed you are categorized as a Wikipedian by alignment. If you are in to userboxes, there are now infoboxes available using a standard template. See the alignment category page for details. This is a copied announcement, please reply on My Talk Page or in the category talk if you have any questions. xaosflux Talk  / CVU  18:50, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

Mass Rapid Transit (Singapore)'s FAC
Hi Miborovsky,

You may be interested in looking at this. It's the first SGpedians' collobration on an article.

- Cheers, Mailer Diablo 13:29, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

outer mongolia
outer mongolia was lost thru the yalta conference. BlueShirts 23:57, 21 December 2005 (UTC)


 * yeah Mongolia is a pretty tacky issue. The ROC never renounced its claim over it, but the Soviet Union in the yalta conference wanted to maintain the status quo of the 1921 soviet-directed mongolian independence, thus officially making china acknowledge its independence. Also, for the manchurian issue, the roc had pretty firm control there. The soviets dismantled the industries and took them away instead of giving them to the chinese communists. Also, the soviets maintained that the only legitimate government is the roc and attempted to stop the ccp from another flare up, so I think it's okay to not add that communists had manchuria to keep things simpler. BlueShirts 17:26, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

RfC Huaiwei
Hi there, just a light hearted comment about the RfC above... I really did find Huaiwei's first reversal to pretty damn funny at first. :) :) :) novacatz 00:09, 23 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Hi there (again), well, I thought that since we all had a chuckle about it - we all thought it was no big deal and hence my comment of 'good faith'. novacatz 00:23, 23 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Ok then. No worries - thanks for the advice -- I am taking this whole RfC thing as a lesson in how to work with the wiki community so I value your comments and feedback.  Thanks for your help. novacatz 00:30, 23 December 2005 (UTC)


 * While I have your attention (thanks in advance), can you tell me - is it appropriate to edit a RfC submission (like mine) after people have commented on it? That would mean that some people's comments are out of date and possibly irrelevant?  I don't want to take out my example now (as you say I should) because that would mean people reading the page will get confused.  What should I do? novacatz 00:33, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

Singapore Gay articles
Hey there! It seems another mod or admin, User:Jguk has decided to arbitrate on Singapore gay equality movement and possibly Homosexuals in Singapore. Somehow though, the result is everything has been restored to Groyn88's old versions. Maybe you want to talk to User:Jguk on this issue, since you're more familiar with it?Akikonomu 03:10, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

The relevant stuff are in the Talk pages: the newly delinked page at Talk:Singapore gay equality movement, and the previous discussion (at the bottom of page) at Talk:Homosexuals in Singapore. --Akikonomu 03:32, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

Seasons Greetings
Hi, a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! --Terence Ong Talk 13:15, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

Don't Know what to do about this...
Hello, I noticed that you made a link-repair edit on the page for Robert Michael Pyle. It appears that the text of that article was lifted directly from the website under its "external links". I do not know the full Wikipedia policy on this, but I thought it might be a copyright violation. Since you are an admin, I figured you might be able to help me out with this. Thanks. -Albrozdude 01:14, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

COTW
Hi, if you haven't notice the Singapore COTW, you may like to take a look here. --Terence Ong Talk 10:57, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

RfC
A RFC has been filed for User:Monicasdude's questionable user conduct. Please join in at Requests for comment/Monicasdude 2.

- Cheers, Mailer Diablo 16:14, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

Image:Wikiweirdness.jpg has been listed for deletion
Welcome to the warparty--God_of War 06:36, 31 December 2005 (UTC)


 * ??? -- Миборовский U 06:55, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

User:Kelly Martin
Based on your comments at User talk:Kelly Martin, I believe that Requests_for_comment/Kelly_Martin may interest you. Thanks in advance for any support you can provide. &mdash;BorgHunter (talk) 22:36, 31 December 2005 (UTC)


 * user:cryptic who says on his userpage "all user boxes except babel are silly" keeps deleting the headers about the RfC from Userboxes and WikiProject Userboxes and bans anyone that puts them back or comments about his vandalism


 * He is abusing his admin instablocking people who disagree with him and deleting messages from talk pages:
 * 
 * 
 * 


 * history of related pages:
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 


 * you might want to bring that up in the RfC. i wont since he blocked my account (saveus) unfairly. --204.157.37.100 01:23, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Template:User aikago-5
I made these templates. It's a joke. They're all jokes, for Chrissakes. I would prefer userfication to deletion for all in the series if at all possible. Please :) Happy New Year. --Cjmarsicano 01:51, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Please see...
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Userboxes, where I've left a comment. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note? ) 04:29, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Responded there. Flcelloguy (A note? ) 04:45, 1 January 2006 (UTC)




 * El_C 04:37, 1 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Well, I tried. See you around, possibly. El_C 04:40, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Nice userbox, by the way. Funny. -- Миборовский U 04:43, 1 January 2006 (UTC)


 * For sheer aesthetic pleasure your user page should get a prize, and the Purge userbox is immediately top of the lot in my subsumed userbox page. May you enjoy a prosperous and yet uninteresting year of the DOG SatuSuro 05:08, 1 January 2006 (UTC)  Trying to get my new sig to work, once again!SatuSuro 05:23, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your compliments, though I do believe El C's perversion of my userbox is much funnier. -- Миборовский U 05:26, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Nah, too big and I like my white goat more than I like my cat, I'll let you know when I manage to upload it!05:59, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

sino-german cooperation
Hiya Mib, I pretty much finished up the bulk of information on Sino-German cooperation, you might be interested to add or fix some stuff over there. I think the article looks pretty comprehensive, do you think it's featured article quality? I think it's pretty cool. Thanks. Happy new year! BlueShirts 07:24, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Hello, thanks for the advice. I haven't read enough about the 60 division plan, but I think we can add that to the German-trained divisions instead of this article. The first book I read dealt mostly with contacts and industrial stuff, and I omitted a lot of detail I think is too confusing for the casual reader. I also think it's best to use Wade-Giles for some terms in this article, because that's what they're most likely to be known, especially during that time period. BlueShirts 08:00, 1 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Hello Mib, can you help me write a longer lead section? The featured article page says it should be like around 300 words, but I haven't found a way to do that without repeating stuff. Thanks. BlueShirts 20:44, 3 January 2006 (UTC)


 * I think we can add a political section (other than militarization and industrialization) and make the intro longer . I only alluded to the fascist influence in the legacy part. Honestly I don't know how it should be added in. Does it go with history of ROC, history of KMT, or what? BlueShirts 00:03, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Userboxes
Hey! Can I request you unprotect Userboxes? Its just it limits the wikiproject abit. I see that has also been protected? Can I ask for the full reasoning of this? Thanks! Ian13ID:540053 12:47, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

RFC
I have opened a RFC (see Requests for comment/Snowspinner 3) against Snowspinner, in part because of his out-of-process block against you. Feel free to endorse or comment. Firebug 17:20, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

"screw process" protect
Hey dude you should tell your userboxes lynch mob that you protected Nanking Massacre - an article you were involved in and that you also reverted to your version stead of asking an uninvolved admin to do it for you. Excelent decision btw- fuck those liars who deny it. This solicited trolling has been co-sponsored by the Cola wars:. HAND. 69.49.99.16 16:09, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

Hello... Mister Ye Hao Min?
Hi,Hao Min!It's in the magazine,all right...so you dun haf ta settle scores with Mr. Suraj...hahaha...(whoops sorry...blared it too loud!)--

Welcome to Esperanza!
Welcome,Mr. Ye!Let me know i you need anything!We're chaired by Celestianpower and the advisory commitee!You can also enquire with Bratsche:D--Tan DX

Scan
Coming right up!I'll mail it to your erpz.net account?

Three Kingdoms?
I see you're very interested in Chinese history.How about ANCIENT Chinese history?Liu Bei,Guan Gong...blah blah blah....all my favourites...anyway,sir,you're very welcome for the picture.But I guess you'll gonna settle scores with the beloved Mr.Suraj for wrong school record!hahaha!

My WIKIVACATION
WikiVacation's the word. -- Миборовский U 05:30, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Departure
What can I do, except to plead with you not to leave us? Your contributions here, both in articles and elsewhere, will be greatly missed by more people than you might suspect.

You mustn't let the occasional scenes of inmates running the asylum drive you away. The departure of any good editor is sad; but to have it happen by the whims of those who consider themselves above the community is a tragedy indeed.

In short: come back! We miss you! &mdash;Kirill Lok s hin 16:02, 5 January 2006 (UTC)


 * I second that. Ian13ID:540053 17:13, 5 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Agreed, we need you to help stave-off the Nazi-like folk, especially the ones in power.  [[Image:Flag_of_Iceland.svg|24px|Iceland]] Guðsþegn – UTCE – 17:45, 5 January 2006 (UTC) --- (formerly known as Chris - from the userbox purge pages)


 * Dear all, I do not intend to be gone forever if I can help it - if Wikipedia survives. I guess it needs divine intervention to now, 'cos face it, "the people" have lost. Utterly. There's nothing more we can do. It was the result of placing too much power in the hands of too few, whether intentional or not. -- Миборовский U 23:56, 5 January 2006 (UTC)


 * I am strongly opposed to placing userboxes in categories as pure WP:NOT and anti-WP:ENC measure, an objection I've yet to see an even remotely satisfactory response to. But all of that aside, what exactly do you propose to remedy your concerns? El_C 00:04, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Nothing. I've croaked more than once, and nobody gives a damn. So I rest my case. Wikipedia is falling down, my friends. Only divine intervention can save you, and maybe not even that. Whatever that is going to happen, Wikipedia will never recover from this. -- Миборовский U 00:15, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm not entirely following that, but hopefuly not, though I guess it remains to be seen. To be honest, I'm not noticing much of a difference on the article mainspace, though this could be misleading. I'm sorry it got to the point where you are speaking in such defeatist terms; I am hopeful you will end up changing your mind. El_C 00:21, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I am, fortunately, not defeated. Wikipedia might be. :) Don't you worry about me, worry about Wikipedia instead. It might not survive, and I *do* want it to survive, by the way. It's just that things aren't very hopeful. -- Миборовский U 00:39, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I didn't meant to imply that you were defeated. Hopefuly, you will be back after a nice break, no matter how bad things get. Whenever I revert ultra-right Japanese historical revisionism, I'll be thinking of you (in a good way!). :) El_C 01:17, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Ah, well. Thanks. Look after my pages for me please. :) -- Миборовский U 01:27, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I'll do one better and personally appoint Kitty to keep guard. El_C 07:32, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * At your command, Hmib! Where's the tuna?! Kitty 07:3§, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Good luck and all the best for your future. Very sad to here your departure from this wonderful place. An early Gong Xi Fa Cai. --Terence Ong Talk 08:43, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * El C/Kitty: Well, the tuna's at Nanking Massacre and related pages. The bad men will be using tunas as clubs. Liberate the tunas! Terence: Thanks, I'll live. -- Миборовский U 09:36, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Right. myself (or Jiang) can take over the protection responsibilities; I'm inclined to keep it locked for another week or two. While we have calm, the opposition is welcome to bring sources and any other concerns to talk, but the article will reflect the prevailing historiography. No more games. El_C 11:28, 7 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Well, that is one area I agree with you Stalinist/Maoist/ admin-dictators. -- Миборовский U 21:24, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

Good luck, and I hope you return. You have been very valuable in fighting those who are given power, but feel it is to dictate. Ian13ID:540053 21:43, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

Your departure
Hi there Miborovsky, I hope you reconsider your contributions "strike", as you could put it, but I would like for you to know that I agree with what you said (see:My opinion about the situation). Just to let you know, I too think that the situation was poorly mistreated. Also, if you leave, your going to be the 4th casualty to leave the wiki over this. I urge you to come back. — M o e   ε  02:44, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Please see above. :) I'll live. No damage done (to me personally) at all. Not worth getting a heart attack for. Cheers. -- Миборовский U 09:38, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

why are you leaving? I must have been under the rocks. Need more ROC loyalists here lol! Come back! BlueShirts 22:50, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Er, I'm not "your" kind of ROC loyalist... Hmmkay? ;p -- Миборовский U 23:34, 6 January 2006 (UTC)


 * okay, so when are you coming back? BlueShirts 09:05, 7 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Don't know. -- Миборовский U 21:24, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

Leaving
I'm sorry that the whole userbox affair has had to come to this, but good luck, and thanks for the ArbCom vote. NSL E (T+C) 01:19, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Seattle Wikimeetup
Does your depature/Wikivacation mean that you don't need a lift to Seattle next weekend? -- llywrch 18:56, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * No. Thanks for the offer though. :( -- Миборовский U 21:24, 7 January 2006 (UTC)


 * templates substituted by a bot as per Template substitution Pegasusbot 06:28, 26 March 2006 (UTC)