User talk:Vanished user 547688/Archive/Archive 01

Cooperation board launched
A new (and overdue) Greek and Turkish cooperation and notification board has been launched here. Stop by, have a look and sound off! Cheers! Baristarim 07:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Same one slogankid
How are you :)? Aristovoul0s 06:11, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

slogankid things got better... :))) ...but your blatant and hateful re-writing of history is desicable. Its shameful, really and truely shameful. I also notice that none of our less nationalistic greek editors have seen fit to attempt to balance out that entry. This is why Wikipedia is a flawed concept and will only ever be of use for non controversial subjects. Adam777 16:30, 2 November 2006 (UTC) ...is just a blatant POV push by an editor whose bias and nationalism are clearly evident from his past edits....Adam777 14:57, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Im not a sockpuppet!!! not even a bot anymore!!! Those days are over... Nice !!! :))))

Im ok Slogankid thanks. Btw you have done nothing wrong. Basicly i had password problems :). What news from the west? Aristovoul0s 11:20, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Adam 777's imbecilic rants

 * Grow up dude, if I have a contrary opinion then I shall place it on Wikipedia as per the rules of the site. Your distorted and hateful view of Cypriot history is laughable anywhere outside of Greece. The world knows full well what happened to the Turkish Cypriots and no matter how you deny it it doesnt make GC actions any less barbaric. I can see that gets under your skin and frankly I dont care. Adam777 17:44, 12 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Actually I am free to write my opinions on talk pages, that is what they are for. You really need to learn how Wikipedia operates. Maybe a grown up could explain it to you. Merry Christmas Adam777 15:55, 13 December 2006 (UTC)


 * I'll say it again, people are free to write their opinions on talk pages. Thats how concensus is formed. You really don't have a clue how Wikipedia works do you. Seriously try reading up on the issues you are (once again) quite wrong. Have fun for Christmas.Adam777 14:10, 14 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Here are some UN docs for you to look up, I recall how you and your mate like to use the UN to back up your hate-fueled arguments. Im sure you can ignore these or call these lies as you wish, once you come up with lies to counter these then I have more for you, there is no fool like the one that refuses to see. Have a hateful day now. Adam777 14:32, 14 December 2006 (UTC)


 * On 8th December 1967 the UN Secretary-General reported to the Security Council (UN doc. S/8286): "When the disturbances broke out in December 1963 and continued during the first part a964 thousands of Turkish-Cypriots fled from their homes, taking with them only what they could drive or carry, and sought refuge in what they considered to be safer Turkish-Cypriot villages and areas."


 * In September 1964 the Secretary-General reported to the Security Council (UN doc. 5950): "In addition to the losses incurred in agriculture and in industry during the first part of the year, the Turkish Cypriot community had lost other sources of its income including the salaries of over 4,000 persons who were employed by the Cyprus Government."


 * During the period 1963 to 1974 the freedom of movement of Turkish Cypriots was severely restricted (UN docs. S/5764, S/5950, S/7350); they were denied postal services (UN docs. S/5950,S/7001); their access to building materials, electrical equipment, motor parts, fuel, chemicals and many other commodities was severely restricted (UN docs. S/5950, S/7350); and Turkish Cypriot refugess had to live in tents and caves.


 * On 10th September 1964 the UN Secretary-General reported: "The economic restrictions being imposed against the Turkish Cypriot communities, which in some instances has been so severe as to amount to veritable siege, indicated that the Government of Cyprus seeks to force a potential solution by economic pressure." (UN doc. S/5950).

Your personal attacks on me
You could just leave me the hell alone and keep your inane, idiotic, incorrect and imature views on my activities on wikipedia to yourself. You are the one who initially accused me of harrasment on my talk page for disagreeing with a nationalistic and highly biased editor on posts that had nothing to do with you. If you would have bothered to keep your unrelated opinions to yourself and not make the inital personal attack against me then we wouldnt be talking now. If you want to quote the rules then you had better adhere to them as well. Your hypocrisy is almost as staggering as your ignorance of history. Now go and read wikipedias rules on assuming good faith, harrasment and personal attacks will you sweetie :). Adam777 17:37, 14 December 2006 (UTC)


 * For what it's worth, counting personal attacks and wikilawyering over them is a waste of time, as no sanction is going to be applied; I advise against taking full advantage of that fact though as in the post above. Adam: you seem to think that Turkey can do no wrong. LOL -- you think that the Greeks are the problem on Cyprus? Turkey and its thug-puppets are the problem there. It's their admirable acts which have generated the most dead and refugees (sorry to shock you about it, but reportedly most Turkish revisionists pretend none of that happened, so you may not have heard of it). Slogankid, don't bother replying to the "hypocrisy" accusation by pointing out that the post above containing complaints about "personal attacks" contains more personal that all your posts put together ;-) //Dirak 18:00, 14 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Is it a national pastime to butt into disagreements that have nothing to do with you in the first place? Dirak, if we were to converse you would find my views are far different from what you have inferred. However the initial poster I was debating issues with (who has the good grace not to make adolescent accusations hither and thither) and his friend here are of the opinion that there were no human rights abuses perpertrated on Turkish Cypriots in any way, at any time. History (the actual real kind of history as opposed to whatever passes for a school sylubus in Greece) clearly shows the opposite and shows a nation torn aside by inept and untrustworthy politicians and external influence. Its not the actions of either party that inflame me its the nationalistic bias that attempts to re-write history to show only the Greek Cypriots as having suffered in Cyprus. The truth is far removed from that fiction. Adam777 18:48, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

No1 has said tc didnt suffer. More GC died and lost their homes. Fact. You are not protecting TC rather than turkey. Turkeys excuse to invade cyprus was the TC even though nt much happened. Turkey fucked up the lives of ALL cypriots. Adam777 clearly dsnt know what he is talking about by his posts. I dont think i have personally attacked you much--Slogankid 11:28, 15 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Not Much Happened?


 * On 28th December 1963 the Daily Express carried the following report from Cyprus: "We went tonight into the sealed-off Turkish Cypriot Quarter of Nicosia in which 200 to 300 people had been slaughtered in the last five days. We were the first Western reporters there and we have seen sights too frightful to be described in print. Horror so extreme that the people seemed stunned beyond tears."


 * On 31st December 1963 The Guardian reported: "It is nonsense to claim, as the Greek Cypriots do, that all casualities were caused by fighting between armed men of both sides. On Christmas Eve many Turkish Cypriot people were brutally attacked and murdered in their suburban homes, including the wife and children of the head of Turkish Cypriot army medical services - allegedly by a group of forty men, many in army boots and greatcoats." The Turkish Cypriots fought back as best they could, but there were no massacres of Greek Cypriot civilians.


 * In December 1963 the Greek Cypriots excluded the Turkish Cypriots by intimidation or physical force from all their positions in the Government of Cyprus. The Commons Select Committee found: "In February 1966 for instance Makarios declared that the 1960 Agreements had been abrogated and buried, and when in July 1965 the Turkish Cypriot members of the House of Representatives sought to resume their seats they were told that they could do so only if they accepted the legislative changes to the operation of the Constitution enacted in their absence."


 * Those are just three examples. How many children have to be killed and how many women raped (on both sides) before you no longer class it as 'Not Much'. Adam777

I mean nt much more happened to 1 side than the other. Ur obviously biased to only report 1 side--Slogankid 14:15, 15 December 2006 (UTC)


 * No mate I am no more biased than you and the rest of the nationalists that pretend history never happened. What I am is very anoyed when people try to re-write history in a nationaistic and appologist manner to cover over human rights abuses and paint an incorrect picture of reality. Thats what Aristovolus does with many of his edits and articles. His article on Cypriot Refugees went so far as to claim that the enclaves came about becuase TC's moved willingly into them in order to obtain takism........ thats just a load of bullshit. When both sides can put their hands up and say, look this happened and we strongly regret it then maybe Cyprus will have a chance. But for now I see one side working towards a compromise and one side flatly refusing to have anything to do with that.


 * Whilst the ROC continues to deny, as Aristovoulus does, that there were human rights abuses perpertrated and maintains a stance that there can be no compromise with the TRNC then Cyprus will stay divided. That tactic has done ONLY one thing since 1974, and thats help to get GC politicians elected. Hell I could run for office in Cyprus on a TC bashing platform promising 'no surrender, no compromise and no rights for Turks' and I'd get elected. It wouldnt help Cyrpus but it would get me a cushy Job. And before you mention Dektas....I agree he did exactly the same thing.


 * So as long as people attempt to re-write history I will continue to get vexed with them. And for the matter I also feel the same about Turkey and the Albanians, Serbia and Kosovo and Darfur. However this little exchange is about Cyprus. Personally I doubt the green line will ever dissapear, we can argue about legalities and semantics all day, it wont remove one single Turkish soldier from Cyprus. The only thing that will do that is a negotiated agreement that protects the TC minority from repeats of past discrimination and addresses the right of return for the GCs that lost their lands and property. Cyprus is NO CLOSER to that agreement than they were in JUly 1974, 32 years ago. I wonder how many GC politicians have been elected on a 'pro-solution' platform as opposed to a 'anti-turks' platform, those numbers might tell you something about who gets what from the current situation. Adam777 15:08, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Master Exploder deletion
Hi,

Master Exploder was deleted. However, it is now up for deletion review. Since you voted to keep it, I suggest that you comment at Deletion_review. I believe that the vote, while in favor for deletion, was too close to be closed at the time. Thanks. Milchama 03:08, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Smashman2004's programs
Hey, the book is actually a pdf I downloaded from Microsoft. If you want it i could e-mail it to you. Thx Smashman2004.

Ok I will send it to that address. Which program did you like the most. and could I have some constructive feedback on them. Thanks smashman2004! =D 22:45, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Here :D
On the main page, you have made a tiny typing mistake: "[here|User:Slogankid/userboxes]" should be "[User:Slogankid/userboxes|here]". Otherwise, whenever a person clicks on it to see our userboxes, s/he finds himself/herself in the article "Here", like I did :)) Okan 09:39, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 19:30, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

HOW OLD ARE YOU????
is august 1991 REALLY your b-day??? if so that means that you are only 15 years old.... i dont know....i think that you may be lying....i only know ONE smart kid......if you really are that old.....well ....i hope your parents know what you do on here!!!!!Bluedolphin 15 18:20, 15 March 2007 (UTC)Professor BlueBluedolphin 15 18:20, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

HEY!!!!
so sorry took me so long. my name is cherokee. i am a tenth grade homeschooler...does my user name not give me away????im fifteen too. which is the only reason i wrote you.....i found you on the water page... BOY that page has a lot of TALK on it huh???and yes, you have your age on your talk page LOL!!!!!!!!!!hope we can talk more!!!!talk to you later slogankid :DBluedolphin 15 13:42, 18 March 2007 (UTC)professorblueBluedolphin 15 13:42, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

sorry........i have read some of your articles.....i dont have long to type on here which is why i "have way too much sugar in my system" :D. my mom is strict about puter time. (don't ask). oh, 11th grade.. must be "cool" to be a junior,eh? since i'm homeschooled, i'm taking mostly 11th and 12th grade classes anyway, like college biology and "deep into the dark ages".(that class is pretty cool..i'm a history buff though...) The only reason i have time to write you now is because everybody is asleep...i like it when theyre asleep...(its 6:30)Can you please explain to me what GREEK ORTHODOX IS????around here the christians are a bunch of baptists..it'd be nice if ya did. talk 2 u L8tr Bluedolphin 15 10:38, 20 March 2007 (UTC)professor blueBluedolphin 15 10:38, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

how exactly are you in the 11th grade when you are only a few weeks older than me?? my B-day is september 14th and i am fifteen too....did you skip a grade???maybe it is that you are in a completely diff. state...explainBluedolphin 15 10:41, 21 March 2007 (UTC)professor BLue

DUH!!!!!!!!!you live in another COUNTRY!!!...just read your user page...gosh...i can be a little retarded sometimes..:D...er....don't think that that is a bad thing though...everybody has retarded moments. but anyway, what is it like in Cyprus?? never been there, may not ever be there, but would like to know about it...never even heard about it....okay..you can smack me now...i live in the U.S........it's nothing special here....so don't think that it is..people give this country SO much credit...when in reality it's pretty much crappy. i'm gonna look up Cyprus on wiki. C U L8R. 71.48.133.201 10:51, 21 March 2007 (UTC)Professor BLue

HMMMM.....
the main page for Cyprus really doesn't say much...i think that there is not enough info. but, then again i could be wrong....there isn't enough information on the united sstates page either....i think i'll do research on that...er....cyprus,i mean. sounds very interesting,and since i'm a "HISTOIRE" (Francais) fan i will have fun, maybe you can show me a few websites or otherwise..would be appreciated..71.48.133.201 10:58, 21 March 2007 (UTC)Professor Blue71.48.133.201 10:58, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

HELP ME!!!
how do you or i put those template boxes on your user page?? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bluedolphin 15 (talk • contribs) 11:07, 21 March 2007 (UTC).

Never mind....figured it out...but still answer my other questions..:D

thanks for editing that..sorta looked over it.;) well lets see..what is it like there? i looked up cyprus on yahoo google wiki and the encyclopedia americana but all it told me was that you all gained independence in 1960.  and a bunch of other stuff...i want to know things like...what does the ocean look like from there???i dunno i've never even seen the ocean and i live in virginia right on the coast of the us. hee hee i like it that you don't give the us much credit...makes me not feel bad about doing it myself :D we should maybe get on here at the same time...kinda boring just sitting here talking to nothing...anyway, i looked up Machinae Supremacy and it looks like the stuff I listen to.  WILL check it out!!!  i never even notice the "technology" around here.  tisn't much to look at..phone, comp., scanner, printer, stuff you have. i gotta go tlk 2 u L8r!

my msn is sacofpeanuts _2009 and email is sack-o @hotmail.com see ya chickakee :D

sac is my initials backward...chose it mainly cause my mom wouldn't think of it...my initials are c.a.s.....hope nothin is wrong...you havn't responded...prob. nothin... maybe you havn't gotten to your comp. yet:D see ya.

Your edit to Manchester United F.C.
Your recent edit to Manchester United F.C. (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 12:42, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Don't worry...
OK kid, I'll let your childish writings there. They'll be removed by someone else. CapPixel 22:11, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Poison pen letter
Hi. The letter you asked about was addressed to a friend of mine who showed it to me and consented to its publication. It is, after all, anonymous. Best wishes, &lt;KF&gt; 21:13, 21 May 2007 (UTC)